You are not logged in.
I play FH over at Pixel-Fighter.com. It's in Germany and most of the players are Europeans, so you have to get there early enough in the day while enough people are still playing, usually before 0000 GMT.
This is kind of getting away from the ban appeals topic, but we may need some clarification in the Server Rules about this. If one interprets them literally, they seem to forbid returning fire at snipers in the main. Is that really what was intended?
This fixed my problem with "please login as administrator and try again" after I installed the latest updates on Win7. Thank you for this fix, and a +1 for your reputation. I hope Microsoft hasn't just done to BF1942 what the Gamespy shutdown almost did.
Since there seems to be a consensus that team stacking is a bad thing, and it looks like it is already enforced on the USA server (I think I even saw someone kicked recently with a !kstack command), I propose the following rule be added to the Battlefield 1942 Server Rules:
Team stacking (switching teams so as to affect the team balance unfairly) is not allowed.
It's important to define our terms in rules, so I would not just say "Team stacking is not allowed."
For determining guidelines on how to enforce the rule, here are some potential circumstances I'm offering to be debated as to whether they are valid reasons to team switch:
My team sucks. I need to get on the good team.
The other team {sucks | has fewer players | has AFK players}. They need my help.
Let's see how many more people we can get on one team than there are on the other.
My friends are on the other team.
I prefer to play on the {Axis | Allied} team.
I keep getting TKed on this team. Get me out of here!
A bunch of people on this team are just goofing off. Get me out of here!
Hey, I've been playing {Axis | Allied} this whole game, and now I get auto-switched!?
I intentionally wrote 2 to be acceptable and 3 to be unacceptable reasons for switching sides, but what about the rest? Can anyone think of still other reasons?
Thank you. Not trying to be a pain, but for some reason I seem to draw TKers. It could just be that I tend to stay on the servers fairly late in the night when there are only a few other players and the disruptive ones get braver; or maybe it's my breath .
Server: SiMPLE USA
Can't remember his name now, but it was one of the default-sounding names like BFSoldier or Player or something like that, and I hope will be easy to find in the logs. On Phillippines game that ended a few minutes ago he came late into the game and was TKing intentionally until he got auto-kicked. Before his final TK he was sitting in one of the defguns on the eastern island shooting at the other (unoccupied) defgun on that island.
I saw him too, and had no problems with him either today. It was Stalingrad, though, so maybe it was just a lack of planes to tempt him .
I've often been disappointed by lack of response to these reports on the FRA servers, but somebody at least might want to keep an eye out for these two on the USA server.
Playing SiMPLE | BF1942 [FRA] on El Alamein going on now or previous game. Player named "damn I'm good" team wounding. For whatever reason he team wounded me right after my first spawn, as I was going to get a plane, even though there were two other identical planes right next to it also available.
The other disruptive player is Rob1nn, who first tried wing walking on my plane as I was taking off, causing me to get a TK through no fault of my own. Next he TKed me to get the B-17. I think he was disrupting play for other players as well.
If you are referring to Mr Magoo in this thread then could someone please explain the rule to him about attacking main?
Mr Magoo has been playing this game for years and is a great player and a really nice guy and is probably one of the oldest players out there, I think he would be 72 or 73 now.
I think this are 2 diffrent players Magoo and Mr.Magoo. I have seen Magoo today on Simple FRA - on bocage, allies side, he was on top of church near axis base - trying to zook tanks in axis base. That was so funny, that I didn't even kick him for doing that..
loool
I can verify that it was just "Magoo," and not "Mr Magoo." Thanks for the replies, everyone.
SimPLE | 1942 [FRA] server: game going on right now on Kharkov: Both Arrow201 and Magoo are repeatedly attacking uncap enemy base with planes.
On SiMPLE | BF1942[FRA] server:
Lavanda, Private Consultation, and ToP are having a big base rape session against the Allied base on Bocage right now. Lavanda and ToP are constantly bombing uncap, and Private Consultation is camped across river shelling uncap with Wespe. When I got there they were ganged up with someone else 4 vs 1 against some guy on the Allies side. I didn't stick around. No point.
ATF_SurrenderMonkey wrote:does this work with windows 10?
You need to run BF1942 with windows XP I believe, then u can join FH servers, atleast without doing that it kept crashing for me
I'm running FH 0.7 on a Windows 7 system and it works. It's been installed for quite some time now, which means it's not the All in One release, so I don't know if any problems have been introduced by it for Windows 7. For the record, in my Compatibility tab on the shortcut I have it set to run in Windows 98 / Windows Me mode, but I don't remember if I had to set that. All the other boxes on that tab are unchecked. Haven't installed Windows 10, so I'm not sure about it, but try the Compatibility settings if you have problems.
I ran into him yesterday at Kbely Airfield on Moongamers of all places. I sniped him long-range before I even realized who it was (he was on the enemy team this time). I didn't notice whether he was TKing there (# 1 in my rules for recognizing him above), but I think friendly fire is off there anyway. He was on as "cptkerk" (# 2), and did reply with an abbreviated curse (# 3) when I said hi after shooting him.
Wow. USA server has 36/36. That's nice to see!
It sure is (unless you're # 37 ).
Don't team-stack.
Sounds like a good rule. Could it please be added to the official list of server rules at http://team-simple.org/rules?
I did post that when I was angry, and I do apologize to PiPER for the tone. It distracted from what I was trying to say, which was that I would have appreciated a warning before being kicked. She did post "now you're team stacking?" to in-game chat, which is how I know what I was kicked for, but kicked me without giving me time to respond.
On the other hand, what kind of discretion do admins have as far as enforcing things that are not in the server rules? As I already said, although I was not trying to team-stack, it seems not even to be against the server rules anyway. Could we have a rules clarification on this?
I just felt like the kick was adding insult to injury after everything that was going on, including being TKed bringing in the flag during a CTF game. I would have appreciated being talked to instead of kicked right away, especially when what I was accused of (team-stacking) is not even mentioned in the Server Rules.
Nice kick without a warning, PiPER. I wasn't trying to team stack on Stalingrad; in fact, up to that time I had been on the same side the entire game. But if I'm on a team with a bunch of idiots who either are TKing or team-wounding me and other players, then I want to switch sides. At least then I can defend myself without getting kicked for TKing (I did not attack any teammates during the entire game, not even in retaliation). And before then you were complaining about teams being stacked the other way (again, I had been on the same team the entire game up to then), so I didn't think that switching over would be a problem. I didn't look at sides at that point; I just didn't want to keep getting team-wounded or TKed anymore.
I don't think you tried to find out what was going on before kicking me. Maybe my "SCREW this TKing and team-wounding" comment immediately before I finally switched sides wasn't enough for you to figure out what was going on, so I hope this explains things. One might think that priorities for keeping a server playable would be 1) keep idiots from shooting their teammates intentionally, then 2) keep sides even; but maybe it's not.
Ever notice how in server ban appeals nobody ever seems to know why they got banned? It reminds me of the Fusilli Jerry episode of Seinfeld:
Kramer: Have you ever *met* a proctologist? Well, they usually have a very
good sense of humor. You meet a proctologist at a party, don't walk away.
*Plant* yourself there, because you will hear the funniest stories you've
ever heard. See, no one wants to admit to them that they *stuck* something
up there. Never! It's always an accident. Every proctologist story ends in
the same way: "It was a million to one shot, Doc. Million to one."
I agree with Pleiades on this.
There is a captkerk5 on Simple USA right now, so I think he is evading the ban again. Trying to get TOOKIE's attention.
(added with edit)
Back from game. Tookie banned him again. Thanks, Tookie.
Here is how to spot this guy:
1) TKs and/or negative score
2) name contains some combination of an abbreviation for "Captain," followed by "kerk" (duh)
3) foul language, especially when confronted
These are turning out to be pretty good rules for spotting him. I saw he just got banned over at aX under the name "cptkerk" (2). The guy who reported him (not me ) complained about TKs (1) and other behavior, and posted screen shots of him cursing at people (3).
I have a cunning plan. It would be helpful to add a link to the SiMPLE | Forum headers to get back to the SiMPLE home page (http://team-simple.org). There have been many times I've been in the forum and would like to middle-click on a link to open the main page in a new tab (often to check the Server Rules), but I've never seen one for it. Instead, I'll middle click on a random forum link, switch to the new tab, and edit the URL. One click would be easier . I know I can make a bookmark for it, but that's still the added step of opening a new tab first. It just seems right that there should be a link back to the home page.
I was thinking of the header at the top, where we have "| Index | User list | Rules | ...," being changed to "| SiMPLE Home | Index | User list | Rules | ..."
Thanks.
This is what's up!
Look at the red line, you came with the B17 and bombed everybody around me. So...my kick is fair, I think.
If that is so, then a good strategy to use to fire across the river with impunity is just to have a teammate or two stand next to your tank during your barrage.
One more thing, i was playing on this server yesterday and i can confirm that the skill level is really below average. Don't take it as offence, lot of bf-league players would be able to get 40-40-0 or even more there.
There was a Reddit article about BF1942 that came out less than a week ago, with a resulting large influx of new players; see http://team-simple.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=3147. So yes, if you were on this server yesterday you most likely did see a bunch of below average players, AKA noobs. I think most people's issues with what goes on at the FRA servers predates this, however. I seriously doubt you could go a game here with zero deaths, though. However good you think you are you can't escape the noob TKers . We (community, not just admins, which I'm not) are trying to work with these new people at least to turn them into responsible players.
For anyone who doesn't feel comfortable patching/modifying their BF1942.EXE file, there is another way to fix this problem. You can edit your HOSTS file so that when BF1942 tries to connect to the old server browser at master.gamespy.com it will be directed instead to the new site. To do this just edit the file c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts, and add the following line to the end of the file:
109.71.69.254 master.gamespy.com
You would do this on each Windows computer you use to play BF1942. If you happen to run your own DNS server (if you don't know what that is then you almost certainly don't), you can add an entry for the above, and only have to do it once if your computers already use your DNS server.
That should be all the information you need to get it going, but for those unfamiliar with DNS and/or interested in the technical details, every computer on the Internet has at least one address, which is a series of four numbers 1-254 separated by dots, e.g. 109.71.69.254. Normally we address these machines by their text names, i.e. master.gamespy.com, so there exist DNS servers (most Internet service providers have at least one available) that translate that name into the proper number.
So normally what would happen when we wanted to find an on-line game was that BF1942 had to connect to the server browser, master.gamespy.com, so it needed to query the DNS server the computer uses and get the numeric address to use to connect to that server. Well, that server no longer exists, so DNS doesn't return an address for it, so BF1942 can't get a list of servers. This makes the game appear to freeze.
To fix this someone has set up a replacement server browser at the address 109.71.69.254. I assume they just weren't allowed to use the name master.gamespy.com, so the remaining problem for each BF1942 player is to get BF1942, which is looking for master.gamespy.com, to look instead for 109.71.69.254. That is what the GameSpy patch does, although I'm not sure how they went about it. The alternate method I'm describing doesn't modify BF1942. Instead it adds an entry to the system HOSTS file. The HOSTS file comes from the Unix and Linux file /etc/hosts, which has the same purpose as DNS, to translate text names for computers into numeric network addresses. The way this works on both Linux and Windows systems is that when a network address needs to be translated, the operating system first looks for the entry in the hosts file; if it doesn't find it there it queries DNS (which is actually the preferred way to resolve the name). Since DNS no longer has an entry for master.gamespy.com, though, putting one into our hosts file works around this problem.
Catpain_Blackadder wrote:Well, there goes our Brony.
Thanks man. I appreciate it. I'm super curious as to why I'm banned my self, if it does get lifted, I'll probably show up now and then, but as a very active Brony in the community I have other things to do so I can't borg in front of the PC like I would.
Hey, have you seen that documentary called "Bronies?" Watched it with my wife because she was already watching it, but it was pretty interesting.
Now I remember why I don't play American servers
It's been my experience that troublemakers are usually dealt with on the USA server. However, both times I've made a complaint about rule-breakers on the FRA servers I didn't even get a reply. So if you want to get away with a bunch of merde I'd say the FRA servers are the way to go.
There is a captkerk5 on Simple USA right now, so I think he is evading the ban again. Trying to get TOOKIE's attention.
(added with edit)
Back from game. Tookie banned him again. Thanks, Tookie.
Here is how to spot this guy:
1) TKs and/or negative score
2) name contains some combination of an abbreviation for "Captain," followed by "kerk" (duh)
3) foul language, especially when confronted
A question for the rules people: how far do the bases extend on Market Garden? Is anywhere north of the river considered the Axis main base? For that matter how far does the Allied base extend? Does it also include the roads that pass it on both the east and west sides? Does it end at the top of the hills above the church?
You got kicked for attacking main base.
From the first Server Rule: "... Nevertheless, it's permitted to air strike at a fireing AA gun or a shooting artillery that's inside the base."
You didn't really address his claim that you were firing a tank gun from the main base. Are you saying that a tank doesn't fall under the category of shooting artillery, or just that you deny shooting from it? Or did you kick him for a different incident of attacking the main base?