#121 Re: Feedback » Reports that SiMPLE is down » 2015-11-02 01:28:23

FYI:

The server crashed after Coral Sea today. It doesn't appear to be recovering. About 16:00 EDT 11/1

#122 Re: Report Abuse » worst hackcusator ever » 2015-11-02 01:19:00

BOS - Thanks for the sincere offer. However, That tactic isn't something that interests me. I'm certain I could learn it, and the consistent medals would be a brag to some, but it doesn't seem much fun and tends to tangibly stifle/disrupt maps for others. I play Tookie and Pleaides a lot actually and thoroughly enjoy the back & forth even when they wipe me out. They bring a lot to the server in terms of great game play, and being just being consistently decent people to hang out (and chat) with. Good on them!

Dinks is spot-on about bailing in general. I've always felt like it's the opponents job to seal-the-deal and your job to stay alive to fight. If you bail and can cap a flag, defend a fellow player, etc to advance the team goals with that ticket, then you're doing things right IMO. Recognizing that, is probably also a matter of sportsmanship.

The other ad hominem comments on me were a bit much for such a brief post about tactics, but whatever works I guess. Anyhoo... Game on!

#123 Re: Report Abuse » worst hackcusator ever » 2015-10-30 04:29:09

There are also poor sports who constantly use altitude to avoid any reasonable attempts to be fought by 98% of players and/or when the game is severely out of balance don't take their plane fairy skills to the other team to attempt to make it an enjoyable play experience for others. Sometimes they rack up killstats while their own team can't even hold a flag and loses the game. They don't say much in chat, but their play style says plenty. Can't leave those folks out either. smile

#124 Re: Technical Help » SiMPLE USA Lag WorkGroup? » 2015-10-16 23:45:05

I'm stepping away from this unless I'm needed. The conversation is going and thanks to those that posted. Ultimately, I hope it's helpful to the server.

#125 Re: Technical Help » SiMPLE USA Lag WorkGroup? » 2015-10-16 19:39:02

Last night I didn't experience the lag problem and the spike that I noticed on those hops went away during my play time. I would agree the spikes I saw are likely not the cause, but they may be another symptom that can get us closer to a resolution. 

Considering the strong comments I received from multiple people that it wasn't the server, Russ' comments, and the fact that the problem is still happening, we still can't rule out anything. Can anyone in SiMPLE verify personally that the host company was contacted and has looked at the host environment? Can anyone wireshark to the server? Those answers would seem to take a lot of the mystery from this situation.

#126 Re: Technical Help » SiMPLE USA Lag WorkGroup? » 2015-10-16 03:40:10

I brought up the server initially and that idea was vigorously shot down by several different admin. Network latency can potentially affect game clock representation. While ICMP can be handled differently, with some devices discarding it alltogether, this is one of the tools we have. It's why I suggested it would be best to get other sources to get a better idea if it's an indicator of an issue. If someone has server access and can run wireshark that would be ideal (to eliminate several possibilities,) but after several conversations in TS and gamechat, no one seems to be able to do this. Some folks claim that the host company has looked at the server, can this be verified??

#127 Re: Technical Help » SiMPLE USA Lag WorkGroup? » 2015-10-16 01:48:47

Russ - There has never been a complaint about the average response time at the nodes. So I'm not sure what 30ms responses or your astonishingly fast 4ms round-trip have to do with anything, or why the tone of your comment is even necessary. I'm trying to be helpful (and show gratitude) to SiMPLE. While this is what I do professionally, it doesn't make me a genius at anything. But, it also doesn't require a PHD in physics to simply read what was already posted...

lonewolf-mcquade wrote:

Thanks trench. The anomalies I found were not present in the tracert I provided above. That was more just a mapping of how my data travels. When I ran an extended ping to each node, I had a reoccurring and discernible spike from the destination down to node 8 (working backwards.)From 7 to me, it was as "clean as a whistle" using the same standard.

lonewolf-mcquade wrote:

If, with further exploration, Comcast is pinpointed

lonewolf-mcquade wrote:

Remember, my comments are **preliminary.** It would be best to compare results with a few other users before proceeding with any course of action.

Extended pings on every Comcast node listed from the destination through hop 8 revealed huge inconsistent lag bursts (600+ms in some cases) Those spikes could potentially be a cause for performance issues as they appeared to be more frequent than I'm used to seeing on commercial paths of similar complexity. It would be interesting to get several people with different routes together to run the same extended pings and see the results. Additionally several admin have stated in TS and server chat that the server had all but been eliminated as the source of the problem by the host. I'd just like to see the problem solved for the benefit of the server, and I'm really not interested in a pocket-protector pissing match about it. If you have something better to suggest, please?

#128 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Battlefield 1942 Re-Textured looking for skinners. » 2015-10-13 00:13:26

bf1942 has ALWAYS needed a bloody zombies mod to play in co-op of course.

#129 Re: Technical Help » SiMPLE USA Lag WorkGroup? » 2015-10-13 00:09:30

Thanks trench. The anomalies I found were not present in the tracert I provided above. That was more just a mapping of how my data travels. When I ran an extended ping to each node, I had a reoccurring and discernable spike from the destination down to node 8 (working backwards.) From 7 to me, it was as "clean as a whistle" using the same standard. If we can at least pinpoint where the spikes are happening or what range, Comcast engineers should be somewhat obligated to investigate with their more thorough tools in their own NOC environment. It would be nice to get a couple folks on TS, and run the extended pings and see who gets what, and where.

-lwmq

#130 Technical Help » SiMPLE USA Lag WorkGroup? » 2015-10-11 23:17:14

lonewolf-mcquade
Replies: 19

Hello Team SiMPLE,


SiMPLE USA has been struggling with lag issues for about 2 weeks. I've noticed over the last 5 days, much lower player counts and several players leaving in frustration after commenting in chat. Obviously this is not ideal! I'd like to offer to help in any way that I can, as I do this type of work for a living. I monitor and maintain a huge national network with resources just like your server that must be accessed consistently and with quality across multiple national broadband carriers 24/7/365. I don't know where you-folks are on this problem, but I have some suggestions if anyone is interested. I'd like to get a work-group together in TS, or would volunteer to join anyone at SiMPLE who is working on this to help.


I've done some preliminary testing with ping and tracert that seems to indicate an issue from hop 8 down on my path.

  C:\WINDOWS>tracert 162.217.248.97

  Tracing route to 162.217.248.97 over a maximum of 30 hops

     1     1 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  [redacted]
     2     9 ms    11 ms     8 ms  [redacted]
     3     9 ms     8 ms     9 ms   [redacted]
     4    13 ms    32 ms    12 ms  ae-36-0-ar02.charlvilleco.va.richmond.comcast.net [68.86.125.145]
     5    32 ms    23 ms    16 ms  et-5-0-0-0-ar02.staplesmllrd.va.richmond.comcast.net [162.151.59.10]
     6    28 ms    27 ms    27 ms  he-1-1-0-1-10-cr02.56marietta.ga.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.91.149]
     7    49 ms    53 ms    51 ms  be-11314-cr01.dallas.tx.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.85.21]
     8    80 ms    82 ms    78 ms  be-11315-cr02.losangeles.ca.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.85.142]

     9    78 ms    86 ms    82 ms  he-0-1-0-1-pe01.losangeles.ca.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.85.98]
    10    82 ms    81 ms    93 ms  ae2.Comcast.lax.us.AS40676.net [23.238.223.49]
    11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
    12    78 ms    77 ms    78 ms  hosted-by.iniz.com [104.216.1.50]
    13    78 ms    77 ms    81 ms  2.164.161.107.iniz.com [107.161.164.2]
    14    79 ms   106 ms    77 ms  162.217.248.97

    Trace complete.

Hop 8 is registered to Comcast and Tech Admin POC info is registered on their Network Whois result. If, with further exploration, Comcast is pinpointed, they absolutely should care about this problem. In that scenario, the issue likely isn't only affecting your server, but any customers that route through that node. That means any priority traffic like video conferencing and QOS (quality of service) voice traffic could be screwed up also.... for ALL customers. These types of issues often self-resolve. But if you want it corrected ASAP, it can require a little hand-holding. It's best to try to have your server host company contact Comcast (for example.) If they will not, there is nothing wrong with doing it yourself, and conferencing the two parties together once you have conjured up support/interest.

     OrgTechHandle: IC161-ARIN
    OrgTechName:   Comcast Cable Communications Inc
    OrgTechPhone:  +1-856-317-7200

Remember, my comments are **preliminary.** It would be best to compare results with a few other users before proceeding with any course of action. Please let me know if I can be of assistance to Team SiMPLE. That's the least I could offer in return for the hours of fun I've had on the server.

#132 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-06 17:46:26

Ah yes, I must've missed that somewhere in there while reading through the sniffling, mental-case parts. Lol.

#134 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-06 03:02:46

Dakota wrote:

LOL  Ramstein was singing that song about LW when he posted, and since he was in this video I thought it was funny.

No one has a clue wtf you're talking about Dakota, not even you. But you have trash comments on the video dating back to 2011. Jesus dude, that's a good 4 years ago. Obsess much?

Reno,
I've already stated when and why I respond. If calling out more petulant BS from these clowns causes your panties to collect-up, I can loan you some tissue paper from my stash.

#135 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-04 22:46:54

The post says MUCH more about you Dakota than it does me. 

I've never really addressed that old video before because it was a tool for harassment from a feud in 2011. Watch it. It was all filmed on one map. One map, one session. The player recording came to me EVERY time I spawned, using a friend on the other team to locate me. So, I suicided every time he did it. Watch the last moments of the video, ask yourself 'how does this player locate a guy in a portal on a ship?' He would do this to be a pest, stop me from capping, or knife me if I was sniping, etc. This very video is in fact just one of the things that player was banned for on that server.

It's a harassment video, and very fitting that Dakota would be the one re-posting it, because he's clearly a classy guy that wants to help resolve Ramstein's connection problem.

#136 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-04 02:17:34

Fascinatingly not relevant as usual. Have YOU figured out why RAMSTEIN is banned yet??? You also left out the beginning where another random player called out the person in question in open chat. Strangely, you don't seem so interested in crusading about the other players or conversations including a guy that was expressing his desire to fornicate in game chat, or were you planning to post about that on the "holiday cheer thread?"

I bet Ramstein would love to get an answer by now.

#137 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-04 00:24:25

Your presentation of incomplete, out of context, or incorrect information comes as no surprise...

(BB)DinkW wrote:

A player has come here and asked if he has been banned because of you - Fact

Funny, I thought he's asking if he was banned since he can't connect to the server and he's getting a ban message that says he's banned... My conversations with him days ago is moot. Flick responded immediately and didn't cite anything involving me as the issue. But that didn't slow you down one bit.

You had previously told him that you were posting the video in forums - Fact

Yep, but after later discussing with the admin that were actually present during the issue (unlike yourself) I did not. we've covered this.

You explained to all the other players online at the time how clever you were in catching the hacker - Fact

FALSE - Did I explain that I was clever? How would you know, you weren't there. To the best of my knowledge I made no such statement.

You did not let the admin that you were speaking to on TS do their jobs and resolve the problems - Fact

FALSE  - I did what the admin in TS asked me to do at that time. Again were you in TS for this chat that you seem to know so much about? NO.

You have produced no evidence of hacks or any other foul play although you accused a player of same - Fact

FALSE  - And this is, for the third time, where I refer you to your own colleagues. But knowing the facts doesn't help your cause does it?

I have told the player who originally made the post that it was indeed not the result of you video that has resulted in his ban - Fact

FALSE - I don't see in this thread where you've told the user ANYTHING useful as it pertains to his ban. You instead attempted to continue to make this about me. You are not helping him, you're helping you.

I said that it was just you shouting off again which it appears to be - Fact

FALSE - I was there, unfortunately, when this unfolded. I was mentioned in the thread by name. What about you? Oh, you saw an opportunity to continue your vendetta.

I thank you for you involvement with this thread we will not require anything further from you - Fact

No thanks. As if I'm not going to reply to your constant misrepresentation. Don't bet on it.

Whatever Ramstein's problem is, which *IS* the issue, it either doesn't involve me or doesn't any longer per the request of your own colleagues. If you don't know the answer, which you clearly don't, back off and let him get his answer. Leave your agenda for me out of it and I will be gratefully done here.

#138 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-03 21:49:01

I have no obligation to you, just as you feel no obligation to learn the facts appropriately. In mentioning that you weren't present or involved, and have nothing to add (aside from your vendetta,) my involvement here is no longer required.

#139 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-03 19:49:47

My being an ass or not has nothing to do with this guy's technical problem or ban. I'm sorry you are both unwilling and incapable of realizing that.

Out of respect for what I was asked to do, I will refer you to your colleagues, once again.

#140 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Good video Because LoneWolf - McQuad I am good player you no! » 2015-10-03 18:39:00

(BB)DinkW wrote:

It was simply Lonewolf shouting off again.

Speaking of shouting off.

The half-page log of my agitation at a hour of non-stop smackplay has no real bearing on this guy's problem, of course that won't stop Dink. I'm surprised he didn't include my convo two days ago about the digestive struggles of whales. It is a good reminder that I should just log off for a bit when gameplay is a mess.

During the specific incident Ramstein is talking about, I was actually communicating with two of Dink's colleagues/admins in TS. Perhaps he should consult them before interjecting into something of which he's essentially clueless about. Yet again. My involvement in this issue is over.

#141 Re: Report Abuse » Need assistance with perceived abuse » 2015-10-02 01:17:36

PipeR wrote:

i dont believe past behaviour on other servers should be bought into simple server dakota im also not sure why other people need to comment on this when dink, pit and lone have sorted it out smile

Thank you. I really have no beef with you Dakota, and I think you should re-read that thread you mentioned. Everyone had valid points except the folks that chimed in unnecessarily. It appears I hadn't committed an offense worthy of the response and it was a misunderstanding that was sorted out. (Flick was just on serenading us with 80's pop lyrics the other day and my dogs all perked up and ran into the room.) So when you talk about dividing people (whoever "us" is), stop twisting facts to defend your friend - where it's not necessary or even helpful. Please?!

PitViper wrote:

Many people play in varying degrees of seriousness here.  You are not required to be a complete asset to your team at all times.

OK, that was also my understanding coming into this. Thanks. I think this issue is basically resolved. I sure as hell hope so.

#142 Re: Report Abuse » Need assistance with perceived abuse » 2015-09-28 04:27:19

Viper,

I wasn't implying a required succession, just that I be treated like anyone else here - Any other regular, that's fine. What on earth is the point in making further threats when I'm here trying to reasonably discuss this?!

It's been more than "just a kick," that's why I posted. So if this is how you want it done, OK. Now I'm clear that Dink can scrutinize and hold me to a separate standard (or just change his reasoning on the fly.) I can expect to be subjected to more whimsical kicks, bans and/or in chat badgering for pretty much anything (if I'm playing a slow game as sniper, just not being "productive enough," for example) Thanks for taking the time to respond. I understand. I'll move on now.

#143 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Donations? » 2015-09-28 01:24:07

If that condition should change, the owner of SiMPLE need only to let me know. I have felt very welcomed here and have been able to enjoy a great experience on the server. I would be willing to contribute if and when it is needed.

#144 Re: Report Abuse » Need assistance with perceived abuse » 2015-09-27 19:17:44

That's good to know Flick. Generally I try to log off. I had a crazy person drive through my yard yesterday while I was playing, lol. It's a thing on our road unfortunately. I think we need a NASCAR retention wall. It seems ALL of us that were AFK should have been booted yesterday.

#145 BF1942 Discussion » Donations? » 2015-09-27 19:13:36

lonewolf-mcquade
Replies: 5

Flick mentioned in another thread that there are bandwidth constraints on the US server. That got me thinking, is there a way to donate to SiMPLE? I've been enjoying the server for a while and probably should contribute when I can. I looked around the forums, maybe I've missed it?

#146 Re: Report Abuse » Need assistance with perceived abuse » 2015-09-27 19:06:27

(BB)DinkW wrote:

I am not even going to get into this with you Lonewolf I have given my response and you will get no more - jog on.


Of course not Dink, because you've run out of misrepresentations and distractions in your nonresponse-response and you have NO way to explain your abusive actions in the server yesterday. The log says it all. (concise enough Coco & bid? tongue )

I hope all admin (including Dink) warn, kick and ban me as they would anyone else. Volunteer Admin is a thankless job that I certainly appreciate on simple42. I want the server to do well and don't intend to have issues. But admin are at their best when they keep things smooth and fun, not seeking to use power to punish people arbitrarily as Dink has been doing to me. If there is more clear-cut abuse like this, I will be back with video to ask why he is being allowed admin rights on this great server.

It's a good day for a jog.

#147 Re: Report Abuse » Need assistance with perceived abuse » 2015-09-27 17:53:48

To summarize:

- It appears that Dink selectively enforced AFK rules, kicking me and leaving others online that had been AFK (in one case for an entire map.) I generally accept AFK kicks (they make perfect sense, and I try not to AFK excessively.) I found it curious that he only chose to kick me and not other AFK players, an action for which he has provided no reasonable explanation.

- Dink kicked me for a fleeting moment of playfulness while reloading that took mere seconds of time to elapse. In game chat Dink stated that I "wasn't playing" as the reason for the kick when I clearly was playing. I had just killed a person about a minute beforehand, and two others moments before that at the flag. The simple logs will show this account to be accurate. Then when I call out Dink's behavior in the Forums for the bogus kick, THE STORY CHANGES and it was that I was "playing disruptively." He clearly feels as if players should be under the level of scrutiny where firing a few rounds off or something innocuous should be cause for a kick. EXCEPT, it's not ALL players, it's just me. The guy he lurks and shadows in game when he's on server. It's a dubious excuse at best.

- The other commentary about googling myself (which I never do but apparently Dink does?!) and other extraneous junk about happenings on other servers is irrelevant and immaterial to my concern about Dink selectively enforcing rules as a means to target me. They are also irrelevant in explaining why Dink is ghosting me in game without any legitimate cause, and using extremely questionable judgment in kicking me from the game for things that NO OTHER PLAYER on your server would be kicked for.

I don't expect to get any accountability from Dink, as he continues to avoid any reasonable explanation of his actions during these specific events yesterday. Dink is more interested in making attacks against me, like disingenuously alleging that I didn't chat to anyone in TS ever (in the last thread, which turned out to be completely false as several admin & users here know.) Alleging that we "both know the truth." in this thread is another disingenuous allegation to spark the idea that I've somehow made this up. Dink says he "can't be bothered to get into this" with me. That's convenient when there's no reasonable explanation for what he did. Interestingly enough, Dink seems to have plenty of time when he's ghosting me in game waiting for an excuse to kick me, and has to resort to kicking me for briefly shooting a wall. roll

#148 Report Abuse » Need assistance with perceived abuse » 2015-09-27 00:10:19

lonewolf-mcquade
Replies: 35

Hello Team-Simple Admin,

I'm seeking your help again, please. This starts today on Bocage - I was booted for AFK as I would expect. (Unfortunately, a guy on my road loss control of his car and had driven across my front yard and the neighbors, so naturally I had to step away to deal with that for a few minutes.) However, I noticed that several other folks had been AFK in game also, and were not kicked. I also noticed when I returned that Dink was still on server, and no other admin said they'd kicked me when I politely asked. Despite my curiosity over this, I continued to play the map.

Later in that session of Bocage, I had been actively playing and dying a lot! I ended up on the small stone bridge southwest of the middle flag, fighting a tank and a guy named "bill." I killed bill and ran from the tank (I thought it was a fairly clever series of decisions.) I was  nearly out of ammo, and I ran to the barn & house on the river to use the ammo box. While there I noticed Dink was AFK in the team list. I wondered if he was shadowing me again, randomly...... You see this has happened before in server where Dink has shadowed me and asked me randomly "wtf are you doing" and etc in moments where I'm not violating any written rule and no one has indicated that I needed to stop doing something in particular. We actually got into a chat about it before last week where I asked him to stop stalking me as I wasn't violating any rule and was playing.... So here I am in the barn reloading and probably being monitored again for no apparent reason. As a test, I wrote the letters "F U" on the barn wall with bullets. I was immediately kicked by Dink. This meant that Dink was indeed stalking me again, and was just waiting for cause to kick me. When I returned, Dink said I was "playing disruptively," yet I was playing and not violating ANY posted rule.  I was never even advised by Dink about anything prior to the kick and there was no reason. Server logs WILL indicate that I killed "bill" about a minute before the kick, and I think two other guys right before that at the flag. I volunteered that I'd take the issue to forums as not to disrupt the server, and Dink then threatened "Next time I will ban your sorry ass." Then Dink logged off and went to PF. I suppose that threat could mean nearly anything, since I wasn't doing anything that was an apparent problem. :\ Simple server logs during Bocage at about 17:00 EDT will support my post.

Dink and I have a sorted history from an old server and it flared up before during the TeamSpeak post earlier in forums this month. Dink had no stake in what happened in that thread and wasn't present for any of the actual TS incident, yet decided to chime in and target me rather harshly (below.) In the end, it was determined that I had NOT violated any rule in TS. The comments weren't relevant to the issue we were trying to sort out before, but shows a repeated history of Dink seeking conflict with me. Meanwhile, I go out of my way not to chat with or interfere with Dink at all, because I know there's an issue there.

http://team-simple.org/forum/viewtopic. … 504#p70504

http://team-simple.org/forum/viewtopic. … 565#p70565

http://team-simple.org/forum/viewtopic. … 575#p70575

http://team-simple.org/forum/viewtopic. … 598#p70598

I would simply like to be able to play normally without Dink targeting me for kicks when he is on server. It seems abusive and unbecoming of someone with admin abilities. If I break a rule, please remind me or kick me like anyone else. I'm certainly not requesting special treatment! To my knowledge, most of my server kicks are from Dink. I don't appear to have problems with other admin, some of whom were present during this game. If I am to be banned, I would hope it's because I've screwed up and broken a posted rule and was a jerk or something (which i would never intend to do, but I'm human!) and not because Dink doesn't like me and stalked me for 45 minutes analyzing my every move for the slightest insignificant cause to pounce.

Thanks for your assistance with this...

#149 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Tookie Once Again! » 2015-09-12 21:09:02

Dakota wrote:

and LW have you no shame ???

I'm not sure what you're getting at here? My comment was serious and heartfelt. I took some time to write it meaningfully, because it struck a cord with me as I'm sure it did with a lot of people. I think folks should able to fight and disagree about this silly game on the stupid internet without going that quite that far. I think what gets lost often is that there are real live humans on the ends of each of these keyboards. Maybe It's sappy/geeky of me to interject that but I'm OK with it.

#150 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Tookie Once Again! » 2015-09-12 01:54:40

I want to add that I think the comments about Reno's wife are just about the lowest most stunningly petulant inexcusable thing I've EVER seen in online gaming. I spoke with Ice last night about it and brought it up, because it frankly made me sick. I related it to personal loss that I've experienced recently, and thought about how dehumanizing the words were. He either refuses to see and/or is incapable of seeing that he should apologize for that comment meaningfully. So I will do it for him, myself, and everyone else here who understands what it's like to suffer a deep personal loss like you have. I'm sorry Reno that you were subjected to that comment, there simply is no place for it in any scenario - especially not for a silly game on the stupid internet.  And I'm just a guest here, but there's just no way I could let that disgusting remark pass, in good conscience, without saying so. I hope this festering cancer of a thread is locked like Dink suggests. It's certainly not a ringing endorsement of online gaming culture and it just needs to cease. This will be my last uninvited two cents.

Board footer