#61 Re: Off-Topic » The California Terrorist attack and How to Deal with Mohammedans » 2015-12-11 11:01:29

Winston Smith wrote:

I completely empathise with the emotions you guys are showing, Pit and Pleiades53, and likewise I have no time for people who blindly follow ideas that I find dangerous and false. 

Religion has served us well for thousands of years; providing rules, structure, meaning, etc, but it has evolved in the West.  We take the good and leave the nonsense: "Thou shall not kill"  Sure, no problem.  That completely makes sense in today's world.   "Thou shalt not wear a garment of differing sorts, as of woolen and linen together."  What?!  But polyester gives my woolen clothes strength!  Go back to the stone age!  Sharia law is scary because it's strict and draconian and many of the rules don't make sense in today's world.  Not only has it not evolve but it threatens to return us all to a darker time.         

However, rounding up Iraian citizens with temporary visas and deporting them during the Iran crisis is one thing, but rounding up American citizens based on their religious beliefs would be a constitutional clusterfuck that would would end up being bogged down in the courts.  I can't see it succeeding legally because there would be too many interest groups opposing it, the NRA for example, would argue that if the First Amendment is cast aside, then the Second Amendment; the right to bear arms, could be next.

My fear, for America, is that vigilantes will take matters into their own hands and when anti-Muslim vigilantes are operating in any Western country it's the Sikhs that suffer; it's always the Sikhs that suffer.  Sikhs are targeted because they wear turbans and look like we think Muslims are supposed to look like. 

So whatever you do, please think it through, protect your family, your country, and your neighbours.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVcHCrzIpTs

It is indeed unfortunate when Sikhs catch this misguided crossfire from haters, especially considering they are ACTUALLY a Religion-of-Peace(TM).  Ignorance is contagious and often has disastrously unintended consequences.   

That being said, the only vigilantism in the Western world worth noting today comes FROM Muslims.  You cannot simultaneously be the world's largest purveyor of hate and violence AND claim perpetual victimhood, it just doesn't work that way.

I don't know of anyone of relevance in my country who suggests "rounding up American citizens based on their religious beliefs."

#62 Re: Off-Topic » I Am NOT Black, You are NOT White. » 2015-12-11 10:48:01

The irony of the message being delivered as a "rap" is not lost.

#63 Re: Off-Topic » Nipples. » 2015-12-09 10:08:40

serebro2064 wrote:

Sry, what is this spam?

My money is on "coping mechanism".

#64 Re: Off-Topic » Europe crumbles under the devastating impact of Mass Immigration » 2015-12-08 05:10:06

Seriously - You give Jews far too much credit.  It's the Irish that run the world!

VtGAiTP.jpg

rcpzTjD.jpg

FSLHzwP.jpg

#65 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-08 04:46:43

tuia wrote:
Aqualung wrote:

Tula - does your white-supremacist, neo-Nazi bullshit make you feel powerful?  Because to me it just makes you come across as a hateful nutjob. 

You seem to have some misplaced notions as to the racial/religious attitudes of Americans, allow me to clear this up for you. 

There are haters in every country/group but, for the majority of red-blooded Americans, the rules of thumb are as follows:

1. Protect yourself and your family
2. Live and let live 
3. Don't be a fucking arsehole

Don't mistake our kindness for weakness though.  We are kind to everyone, but when someone is unkind to us, weakness is NOT what they will remember about us.

You fail to see the racial realities even in your own country. You should review some crime statistics in USA.

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/030315/1231119minority.jpg

I'm well aware of the crime statistics, here and abroad - what is your point?  Are you calling for extermination of minorities? You might want to check with some (now) elderly German folks on how that abominable inhumanity turned out for them.

#66 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-08 04:41:38

tuia wrote:
Aqualung wrote:

And once again, you've opened your mouth and removed all doubt as to who is the real fool.  Riddle me this... if Jews indeed "control the news", why is the overwhelming majority of the "news" cycles spent bashing Jews? 

Tula logic FTW.

What news do you watch? There is any criticism of jews in mainstream media, and is the most harshly punished of political correctness heresies. Your logic baffles me.

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/030315/1209152 … lmedia.jpg

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/030315/2468866jewishcorps.jpg

Put down the Nazi propaganda pipe for a moment and try to understand reason and logic.  Here is a Palestinian Arab, no friend of Israel, telling it like it is.  He must be a "pawn" though, right Tula?  Grow up, your hateful conspiracy theories are no longer fashionable.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/respec … as-israel/

#67 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-08 04:32:26

tuia wrote:
Aqualung wrote:
tuia wrote:

What about rabbis sucking blood from babies' penis?

You are grasping at straws now Tula...

A quick google search will reveal:

1. There are very few Rabbis that perform this ritual.

2. The ritual was performed to MINIMIZE bleeding/pain/discomfort for the baby.

Baby gets herpes from bizarre Jewish penis sucking ritual

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/030315/6262292circumsision.png

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/030315/5694624 … cision.jpg

Lmao you want to quote me some irrelevant bullshit from a website called 'destroyzionism.com'?  At least TRY to show some integriyy.  Even if your racist propaganda were true, it doesn't change my point one bit.

#68 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-08 04:28:22

tuia wrote:
koolkat84 wrote:

what tip do you have for the rest of the world to avoid making same mistakes as Sweden's?

Hey Aqualung,

Why do you create another forum account? Want to get your points across?

Hey Tula,

koolkat is my roomate.  I'm trying to get her into BF.

#69 Re: Off-Topic » The California Terrorist attack and How to Deal with Mohammedans » 2015-12-06 05:04:51

What did the American Founding Fathers have to say about Islam?  Below are a few excerpts - it would seem not much has changed in 250 years...

Here is what John Quincy Adams wrote about the Islamic prophet Mohammed:

"In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE."

John Quincy Adams also described the Qur'an in one of his essays as follows:

"The precept of the Koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force."

In a March 23, 1790, letter to the editor of the Federal Gazette, Benjamin Franklin wrote:

"Nor can the Plundering of Infidels be in that sacred Book [the Quran] forbidden, since it is well known from it, that God has given the World, and all that it contains, to his faithful Mussulmen, who are to enjoy it of Right as fast as they conquer it."

In 1786, Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain. They asked this ‘diplomat’ by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved her citizens and why the Muslims held such hostility toward this new nation, with which neither Tripoli nor any of the other Barbary Coast nations had any previous contact. The answer was quite revealing. Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja (the ambassador) replied that Islam:

“Was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

#70 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-05 03:11:25

serebro2064 wrote:

I still can't figure out how there are still "tolerant" idiots who call own people racists and vote for open borders and want to let in a lot of uneducated, unfit (religiously) and completely unknown people. It will destabilise the system and screw everything up...how can't they understand..

Easy to explain, harder to fight (by our own choice).  Politikal Korrectness is an extremely infectious and highly deadly form of societal cancer.  There you have the problem, explained in one sentence.

In the current manifestation, we (the West) don't want to admit that the very root of the problem - 3rd world Muslim male savagery which we have willingly imported into our otherwise (relatively) peaceful countries.  Understandable, it's a difficult concept for us to grasp given our enlightened 21st century worldview. 

Therefore, in a sad attempt to trip over ourselves being PC, we desperately reach for ANY other scapegoats - Racism, diversity, Global warming, Global cooling, tolerance, multi-culti-ism, Jews, Gypsies, Blacks, Hispanics, Tall people, Short people, Skinny ppl, Fat ppl - really anything that will save our sorry selves from dealing with the ACTUAL problem, the importing of MORE 3rd world Muslim male savagery. 

We have CNN reporters out in CA interviewing the widow of one of the victims of the latest atrocious Islamic violence and murder.  This CNN reporter asks the grieving widow, "Do you think your murdered-in-cold-blood Christian husband may have said something to provoke this Muslim into attacking them?" 

REALLY?!?!  Are you fucking insane? You want to blame the victims?? 

The reality is that we are in a bad state now.  We are sad.  We are pathetic.  We have no pride in our own cultures and traditions.  We self-censor ourselves, the media do likewise, all in an attempt to please the enemy and it doesn't work.  They laugh at how weak we are and how easy we are making the takeover for them.  We must change this PC crap and stop creating false-scapegoats.  This shit has gotten way too many people killed/hurt, way too many children abused, way too many women raped - ENOUGH. 

If we continue to ignore the cancer that is PC, we all end up like Sweden before too long - first Europe, then the Americas.

I wish the facts were otherwise but that's the thing about facts, they are often stubborn and inconvenient.

#72 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-04 21:18:32

bud wrote:

I have a strong urge to paint a big swedish flag on my car, but i wont do it, either i could get beaten up or my car could get wrecked. (might do it anyway, well see)

bud - my eyes just cannot believe that which they see/read.  You are describing a 2015 version of GDR Stasi, only with anti-nationalism as it's goal.  I fear that the 1st Amendment of my own country is under threat like never before.  This is precisely why we have the 2nd Amendment - to protect the 1st.

#73 Re: Off-Topic » The California Terrorist attack and How to Deal with Mohammedans » 2015-12-04 13:33:57

Zody wrote:

Still no official confirmation. Conspiracies aren't helping.

I know that Mohammedanism isn't a race. My point still stands, Churchill was a racist. He thought that he is a member of a superior race hence are his remarks on Muslims not surprising.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic

#75 Re: Off-Topic » The California Terrorist attack and How to Deal with Mohammedans » 2015-12-04 11:59:10

Zody wrote:

Quoting Winston Churchill in race questions is also not smart. He was a racist and pretty much supported Hitler's race theories.

Mohammedanism is not a race.

Zody wrote:

And guys as far as I know the attack is yet to be confirmed a terrorist attack.

Please tell me you're being facetious. Our Leftists are tripping over themselves to call this attack on the homeland anything but what it actually is.  They are desperately trying to spread the lie that this was a misplaced case of "workplace violence". 

Right... So the story goes like this...

Syed Farook was mad someone ordered sausage pizza at the Christmas party and he just happened to have a few AK 47s, tactical body armor, grenades, a full IED bomb-making factory in his basement, 12 IED's pre-planted at the office, and two friends ready to make things right by murdering 15 innocent co-workers.

If you are naive enough to believe this narrative then I have a climate changing magic 8-ball to sell you. You wouldn't be alone though, our own King Barry believes the same.  Check it out.

OBAMA : MOTIVE NOT CLEAR
FBI : IT'S TERRORISM

Shockingly, it has now become clear that the Muslim terrorists were... Muslim terrorists. Or, one of those "Nothing To Do With Islam(TM)" Muslim terrorists. You know, the kind that quote the Qur'an, kill people in response to Fatwas and do other non-Muslim things like attend mosques regularly, shout "Allahu Akbar" while murdering innocents, etc.

According to Obama , it could be anything. Workplace violence, Global Warming, Microaggressions, White Privilege... Obama's even considering this wacky notion that it might be... wait for it... Terrorism!

Either way, the real lesson here is that we must take away guns from law-abiding Americans and give them to Syrian Jihadists instead.

And oh yeah, we have... WEATHER... And it fluctuates... Oh no we're all doomed!!

#76 Re: Off-Topic » The California Terrorist attack and How to Deal with Mohammedans » 2015-12-04 11:00:39

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

~ The Right Honourable Sir Winston Churchill

#77 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-04 08:05:22

ATF_SurrenderMonkey wrote:

So, when pigs fly has a special meaning?  Put a pig on each airline flight?

Pork Chop Airlines?

#78 Re: Technical Help » Playing on Linux » 2015-12-03 11:34:26

winecfg can also help with setting display parameters.

#79 Re: Off-Topic » Wireless Headphones » 2015-12-03 06:59:35

ATF_SurrenderMonkey wrote:

Son wants em for xmas.  Not for gaming, for doing lengthy music video editing, projection work (outside) blah blah.
he mentioned Audio-Technica. I know nothing....sad but true.

whadup...oh....Hi HoOK

Those Sonys are quite good, though they tend to over-emphasize the lower frequencies (good for listening, bad for editing).  I would steer your son away from wireless - wireless is rarely ideal for anything beyond screwing around.  There is always going to be some element of latency to wireless, it's the nature of the technology.  When you are splicing and dicing audio tracks, the last thing you want is more latency.

For wired headphones, your best bet is to stick with "neutral" frequency response, referred to as FRFR (full range, flat response).  There are few headphones that will give you true FRFR at any realistic price point but here are the two most popular ones - both are excellent.

1. Beyerdynamic DT-880 ($200-250) - these are super neutral and give the most "flat" frequencies.  They are also "open-back" headphones, if you don't know what that means, look it up.  Some love it, others hate it.  These are my go-to for audio recording and editing, they give the closest feeling of FRFR without actually using FRFR monitors.  They are also very comfortable to wear for hours on end. 

2. Sony MDR-V6 (~ $80-100)- These have long been the stalwart for low(er) cost audiophiles.  They reproduce sound extremely well, are better than good at basic noise cancelling and are pretty comfortable for long-term wear.   

I own 4 pairs of the MDR-V6's and 2 pairs of the DT-880s.  I wouldn't hesitate to recommend either of them, both are excellent.

#80 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-02 04:02:30

tuia wrote:
PitViper wrote:

Bud I too am sorry you have to endure such bullshit in your country...we have our own tang of the dookie here too....but like Aqua said...at least we have the freedom.

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/030315/3309298 … speech.jpg

And once again, you've opened your mouth and removed all doubt as to who is the real fool.  Riddle me this... if Jews indeed "control the news", why is the overwhelming majority of the "news" cycles spent bashing Jews? 

Tula logic FTW.

#81 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-02 03:50:34

tuia wrote:
Count ComBat wrote:

about a lil girl which had to bear this genital cutting (made mainly in Africa afaik) with a rosty razor blade, man unbearable..

What about rabbis sucking blood from babies' penis?

You are grasping at straws now Tula...

A quick google search will reveal:

1. There are very few Rabbis that perform this ritual.

2. The ritual was performed to MINIMIZE bleeding/pain/discomfort for the baby.

You're not seriously trying to draw a parallel between this and the barbaric Islamic crime of purposefully mutilating a young girl's genitalia in order to deny her ANY sexual pleasure, are you?

Some words on FGM (courtesy of Wikipedia):

The procedures differ according to the ethnic group. They include removal of the clitoral hood and clitoral glans, removal of the inner labia, and in the most severe form (known as infibulation) removal of the inner and outer labia and closure of the vulva. In this last procedure, a small hole is left for the passage of urine and menstrual fluid; the vagina is opened for intercourse and opened further for childbirth. Health effects depend on the procedure, but can include recurrent infections, chronic pain, cysts, an inability to get pregnant, complications during childbirth, and fatal bleeding.[10] There are no known health benefits.[11]

#82 Re: Off-Topic » Sweden » 2015-12-02 03:42:56

Tula - does your white-supremacist, neo-Nazi bullshit make you feel powerful?  Because to me it just makes you come across as a hateful nutjob. 

You seem to have some misplaced notions as to the racial/religious attitudes of Americans, allow me to clear this up for you. 

There are haters in every country/group but, for the majority of red-blooded Americans, the rules of thumb are as follows:

1. Protect yourself and your family
2. Live and let live 
3. Don't be a fucking arsehole

Don't mistake our kindness for weakness though.  We are kind to everyone, but when someone is unkind to us, weakness is NOT what they will remember about us.

#83 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-02 00:43:32

Syndrum² wrote:
Aqualung wrote:
HoOK wrote:

You says that isis is presenting islam,  so?

I am saying that ISIS is 100% Islamic.

ISIS is 0% Islam.

You said it so I guess it must be so, thanks for clearing up the confusion!

Nothing-to-do-with-Islam-cartoon-620x4071.jpg

#84 Re: Off-Topic » Titles for SiMPLE Forum » 2015-12-02 00:41:35

Not much of a story, you have a childish forum admin.

#85 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-01 19:42:08

HoOK wrote:

You says that isis is presenting islam,  so?

I am saying that ISIS is 100% Islamic, just like the other 57 Islamic terror groups.  Their horrendous actions are very well supported in the commandments/teachings of the Qur'an, the Sunnah and, perhaps most importantly, in the examples of their prophet Muhammad.  Ignoring or ,worse yet, whitewashing the Islamic basis for their atrocities doesn't help anyone, especially the so-called "moderate" Muslims.

An important note.  NOBODY (who is sane) is saying that "all Muslims are terrorist".  What we are saying is "Nearly all terrorists are Muslim, and acting in the name of Allah".  There is a distinction here, even if it is missed on some folks.

#86 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-01 19:12:49

HoOK wrote:

I understand  from this that im terrorist  too?

Why's that?

#87 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-01 11:26:10

Agree with nearly all of that.  To point 3 however, have you seen the latest IS propaganda video?   I think you will agree it is a bit different than North Korea. I also happen to think it is the most important video yet. 

It is helpful to understand some basic and universal Islamic concepts like Khilafa, Jihad, Kuffar, Shirk, Hijrah, Mushrikeen, Tawaheed as well as some historical political frameworks such as Sykes-Picot and previous Caliphates. 

Anyway, this video tells me several things:

1. It IS absolutely about Islam.
2. It doesn't matter if you don't think #1 is true, THEY do and that is ALL that matters.
3. All of a sudden, things like "refugees", end time prophecies, etc start making more and more sense.
4. We either:
  a. win this fight, win quickly, win decisively and win with overwhelming certainty.
  b. commit willful suicide.
  c. there is no "c"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmlbMsS5yRM

#88 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-01 07:07:45

Winston Smith wrote:
Aqualung wrote:
seventy wrote:

"Without the Iraq war, Islamic State wouldn't exist today, former US special forces chief Mike Flynn openly admits."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor … 65131.html

sad

So... let's assume for a minute there was no Iraq war (I was not in favor of it btw) - we will give the benefit of the doubt and say that without the war, we wouldn't have Islamic State today (they would just be fighting us under their parent company, Al Quaida).  So then, by this logic, we would ONLY have 56 different worldwide-Islamic-terror groups instead of 57?  That sounds SO much better...

Source: Worldwide Islamic Terror Groups List

The truth is, the reason we have a worldwide Islamic Jihad problem has little to do with "American foreign policy", "The Iraq War", or any other phony list of grievances that Leftists gobble up like catnip.  The reality is that they just want to fucking kill us all because that's what Allah told them to do.  And here we are, wallowing in denial, desperately searching for ANY scapegoat that will save us from confronting this uncomfortable reality.

I believe that Western involvement in the Middle East has allowed the rise of IS/Daesh.  The Invasion of Iraq was a massively destabilising event that was not managed well during the occupation phases.  Disbanding the largely Sunni Iraqi army and not ensuring that all Iraqi weapons and explosives were accounted for lead to a situation that made the subsequent civil war possible.  The civil war allowed secular divisions to widen and become even more entrenched. 

IS/Daesh is largely Sunni.  Sunni is the ethnic group that was in power during Saddam's reign and made up the bulk of Saddam's military.  IS/Daesh is more or less an ethnic group.

Al Queda was different.  They were former mujahideen who came from abroad and fought in Afghanistan.  Al Queda had a global, rather than an ethnic, plan.  Whereas IS/Daesh want to create a nation state in the general area that the Sunni people have historically lived, Al Queda do not have the same nationalistic goals.

I believe that without the invasion of Iraq, and the subsequent Iraqi civil war, most of the fighters who are now members of IS/Daesh would instead be under Saddam's firm control, whether in the military or simply as Iraqi citizens.  In that situatoin IS/Daesh would indeed be just another Islamic terror group among many.

Good analysis, I agree with much of what you said.  Several points of contention:

1. IS has it's roots in JTJ, founded in 1999, pledging allegiance to Al-Qaeda in 2004 as AQI (Al-Qaeda in Iraq).  Granted that AQI namesake did not become active until after the US-led invasion.

2. Sadaam's and his loyalists were Ba'athists, an Arab nationalist party.  One of the founders of Ba'athism, a Christian named Michel Alfaq was a strong supporter of secular government.  He stated that a Ba'athist state would replace religion with a state "based on a foundation, Arab nationalism, and a moral; freedom."  He also said that the Ba'ath Party "is with religious faith, but is not a religious party, nor should it be one."

3. The goals of IS and Al-Qaeda are largely the same, worldwide Islamic domination.  Yes, they have slightly different strategic aims along the way but the end goal remains the same.  IS detailed its goals in its Dabiq magazine, saying it will continue to seize land and take over the entire Earth until its "Blessed flag...covers all eastern and western extents of the Earth, filling the world with the truth and justice of Islam and putting an end to the falsehood and tyranny of jahiliyyah [state of ignorance], even if American and its coalition despise such."

4. Sunni/Shiite are denominations of Islam, I don't know that I would refer to them as "ethnic" divisions.  The schism is largely religious and there are rather significant ethnic divisions within each denomination.

Again, 100% agree with the notion that the invasion of Iraq was a hugely destabilizing event.  It was also EXACTLY what Al-Qaeda wished for in their infamous "Al Qaeda's Strategy to the year 2020" (If you haven't read it yet, I suggest you do - quite chilling how many of their goals have already been achieved). 

I also strongly disagree with interventions in Libya, Syria, Egypt, Yemen, etc.  I prefer the largely secular Assads, Ghaddafis, Mubaraks, Al-Sisis, Husseins, etc over the "not-so-radical" Islamists ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.  As you aptly noted, they (secular dictators) have a firm grip on their nutcase fanatics and do/did a rather excellent job of keeping them under wraps.

The lesson for us is that democratic society is simply not meant for everyone.  3rd world (primarily Muslim) barbarians have much evolving to do before they can be expected to do anything useful with it or the freedoms inherent in a (relatively) democratic society.

#89 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-01 05:09:18

seventy wrote:
Aqualung wrote:

The reality is that they just want to fucking kill us all

How many are "they" ?

WAY too many:

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages … -polls.htm

Have you heard that Islam is a peaceful religion because most Muslims live peacefully and only a "tiny minority of extremists" practice violence?  That's like saying that White supremacy must be perfectly fine since only a tiny minority of racists hurt anyone.  Neither does it explain why religious violence is largely endemic to Islam, despite the tremendous persecution of religious minorities in Muslim countries.

In truth, even a tiny minority of "1%" of Muslims worldwide translates to 15 million believers - which is hardly an insignificant number.  However, the "minority" of Muslims who approve of terrorists, their goals, or their means of achieving them is much greater than this.  In fact, it isn't even a true minority in some cases, depending on how goals and targets are defined.

The following polls convey what Muslims say are their attitudes toward terrorism, al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, the 9/11 attacks, violence in defense of Islam, Sharia, honor killings, and matters concerning assimilation in Western society.  The results are all the more astonishing because most of the polls were conducted by organizations with an obvious interest in "discovering" agreeable statistics that downplay any cause for concern.

(These have been compiled over the years, so not all links remain active.  We will continue adding  to this).

#90 Re: Off-Topic » I am a jihadist and I am tired of not being given credit. » 2015-12-01 03:25:47

seventy wrote:

"Without the Iraq war, Islamic State wouldn't exist today, former US special forces chief Mike Flynn openly admits."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor … 65131.html

sad

So... let's assume for a minute there was no Iraq war (I was not in favor of it btw) - we will give the benefit of the doubt and say that without the war, we wouldn't have Islamic State today (they would just be fighting us under their parent company, Al Quaida).  So then, by this logic, we would ONLY have 56 different worldwide-Islamic-terror groups instead of 57?  That sounds SO much better...

Source: Worldwide Islamic Terror Groups List

The truth is, the reason we have a worldwide Islamic Jihad problem has little to do with "American foreign policy", "The Iraq War", or any other phony list of grievances that Leftists gobble up like catnip.  The reality is that they just want to fucking kill us all because that's what Allah told them to do.  And here we are, wallowing in denial, desperately searching for ANY scapegoat that will save us from confronting this uncomfortable reality.

Board footer