SiMPLE | Forum

The trailer is wrongly done, no doubt, but its  real purpose is to show in each sequence those features and modes which will appear in the game. Example the jumping through windows. Like in the Battlefield 1 with break opening through the door while sprinting, in Bf V you'll be able to jump out the window in a similar way without need to destroy it first. The trailer also suggests there will be a new motion mechanics,  building defences and fortifications, transportabled AA/At guns, new squad and reviving/spawning system, redesigned ragdolls and physics and for some players mainly - the optional customization. Players should have the choice about in-game characters, vehicles, weapons and their customization. Among others you will be able to choose such as gender, race, body painting or camouflage and defensive parts for your equipment/weapons/tanks/planes/vehicles. So model of wonder woman with prosthetic arm should not be so binding for the game.

I recommend this trailer analysis by jackfrags https://youtu.be/3fzUDX5CZaU   besides other things he´s one of the guys, who was able to see game presentation behind the doors and mention that trailer does not represent actual gameplay so awkwardly.

There should be a multiplayer beta already in June, so we will definitely see more.

That´s all this story about, isnt it.

This Sergioten case´s unfortunate, Gorr solved it quickly decently. Atleast he will learn that before using a grenade at one person in own base at an overcrowded airstrip where they may just be other teammates, he will think about it at least for a moment. But on the other hand, even this "admin´s aggression" is what a server needs sometimes. While you chit-chat here about - abusive admins, player´s rights, "psycologic" impacts and thus non-full servers -, in-game practice is still  being affected by inappropriate spamming, trolls with variety of purposes, tks, tws and disruptive elements. During weekend simple fra server can reach up to 70+ players even now and among those who join just to play, there are always ones, who somehow and wilfully spoil it. From time to time It´s really mess and  I am as player personally grateful that someone from the admin is always on and they are trying keep it in order even with this strict measure. Mistakes are made from them, I was involved in such x times, It can be always explained reasonably as well though like this. But do not try to make this as precedent of some kind of dictatorship of admin team and pretend to be crusader of player rights.

You want to know who may be those poor players with rights of rehabilitations? Last weekend for example, I was tked in purpose by nervous guy (however who does not play for the first time) in the landing craft on Iwo Jima map, only  because for few seconds I was waiting for coming on players from  the start of the match and he didnt get it. He then took control of the craft and went into action solo. Unnecessarily and without any apology. Fine, I can take it. What about those experts, who cant stand, when they dont get planes, tanks or whatever? Standard furious damaging own vehicles follows by firearms or grenades in the base or airfields (parallel to Sergiotens). What about stealing repairing tanks//vehicles without a word? What about common baseattack thing even with rules messages clearly showing in several languages. What about not using brain for this game....

Each of us once was or is the novice in this game, there are different age categories playing and so on, but it doesnt mean to have a thought to behave like a fool and make some kind of trouble or stupid actions for everyone only because my ego, score or I cant get this game and its gameplay properly. Dont get me wrong, none of us is infallible, there are and will be still tks more or less by accidents or bad gameplay desicions. By me as noob, by admins, by veterans, by everyone. Depends on the situation and circumstances, but if it happens, quick apology follows, victim take it into account, its done. All with respect. But overall, if you really mean to play this game on this server, its all about one thing, follow the rules, try be polite to other players, whatever they are old or new and try to play with the best of intentions as you can, dont mess around excessively. And if you are not willing to do this, you just can spent your crying time on the forum about injustice.

He seems to be just a another confused zoologist and idiot. As for ingame, under normal circumstances he should be banned for 3 days by Sunshine  since yesterday  for this rhetoric, but he is cheerfully playing on the server right now, so it looks like repeated ban-evading at least. Surely admins keep an eye on him.

And that's it, for its time...

Anyway, although some sources, particularly in archives in Germany are ambiguous on this, both reports (although affected) from SS-Brigadeführer Karl von Treuenfeld, who was in command of charging SS troops there, and from leader of the Gestapo office in Prague Hans Ulrich Geschke (not sure about Panwitz report though), dont indicate something about drop caches or sub-machines guns, much less stens, in possession of parachutists during the battle in the church. There was most certainly one Sten gun, the one which was used during assassination attempt and which jammed and was thrown away on the spot of assassination. But nothing similar for the church firefight. Do not forget, the church was provisional hideout for them and the same day they were planned to be transfered outside the Prague, it was not meant to be their Alamo with tons of loadout.

But as always, none of us were in the church back then, so hard to tell how they really resisted and with what. Maybe they used enemy weapons and grenades too, if they have such chance, who knows. Fact is, three man on the choir managed hold on against better equipped enemy and outnumbered for 2 hours at least (which reports say). Remaining four resisted for a further period in the crypt with small calibers. That´s surely respect worthy.

Casca was unable to hit someone with his insanely spraying submachine gun again?

That´s where this dispute starts. Yep, I was behind rear guns of that ship from the all way from our base. I didnt expect that that noob in main position is going to beached it near opponent´s base. I was securing rear and suddenly we stopped near yours base cos beaching and he started shoot planes on the spawn. I warned him myself  not do it. But when it happened I didnt attack any planes at spawn or base in general at all. Why would I do that when I follow the rules pretty much. Instead, after that guy was kicked off, I tried to the ship get away from there as soon as possible. If this ban in your eyes is based on that I've just been on that same beached ship right in that moment right near the opponents base, then what can I do after all. Just been on the wrong place at the wrong time and you reacted to the situation. I do not have a problem with it.

Look, its not really a big deal, my first somehow lasting ban for years playing this game, I just wanted to clarify what exactly happened.

I played too and didnt see any problem with him while waiting on carrier, so that´s the question what exactly happened there. Before I left the game there was a player named "Adolf Hitler" though, who was reported to be tk for planes, maybe it all started with this guy.

Anyway, you should pay more attention to yourself too, my friend. In your case, when was sending rockets to my position even though, you can check minimap for teammates, wasnt quite worthy of appreciation.

It was only kick off the server after all, so not a big deal, but still surprised me that this could happen. Sure, there are players, who use vehicles and planes just for nothing and waste them and play disruptively, but judging who and how benefits more or less to the game or which score he has and if not, he will be kicked even there is no apparent violation of rules, is slightly doubtful thing in my opinion.

Especially in the case of Privet here. As I know this guy uses brain for the game and he is very capable on the battlefield. And once he gets to the plane he is attempted to be helpful, cooperative with the rest of the team on the ground and in the fight with enemy air. I dont believe that he played there only for nothing.

During the game you can quite recognize between those, who hit own accidently whether they are new or experienced and those, who hit someone on purpose or just because they dont use brain properly or any reason they have. If someone example from your team drop bomb on your head via plane, because situation on the ground was unclear for him, ok, sh*t happens even still to the best, but when teammate just walks towards you and stares on you for a while and then just opens fire to kill you, there's no excuse for it. Everybody of us was once new in the game, but perhaps because of it I believe we tryied play carefully, gradually gaining experience with the gameplay with as few errors as possible and respect other players and ingame rules. According even the part of video, situation on that af was crazy and I dont blame e.S. for intervene as such. Again, repetitive baseattacking even with warnings, jitterbugs who just start with damaging vehicles or planes with firearms or flaks, when they cant get them or cos thery are bored in that moment, wall of useless texts not related to the ingame etc. You can notice that lot of nicknames there are quite  known on the server for some time, so they can know the rules and  how to play. e. S is maybe strict sometimes, but he is doing his job, which doenst effect those, who want to play normally.

Have to say I myself was warned several times by some admins as well  to "not bugging" after some firefights. Despite that I was not aware of any intentional misconduct and thought that I was just killed in usual close combat with rifle and pistol in hands and just firing and using cover behind sandbags, barrel or part of bunker against rushing opponent with his smg and its bursts to my position. What I read so far if this matter is viewed by someones of you as stated above, these responses are clear for me now. It still surprises me that consider this covering behind obstacles by using crouch/prone keys (it depends on the size of the obstacle in the game) and possibly shooting over obstacles as unworthy thing intended for forbidding became the subject of dispute. I understand that an engine used for Bf1942 with its netcodes has its moments and causes things, which some players intentionally favoring it for theirs benefits and which causes inconveniences to others, but I was convinced that case of using somehow cover against the enemy fire or firing on the enemy from there is for this type of wargame something absolutely natural after all. From my ingame perspective as ordinary player it has no disadvantaging or using glitch purpose, I just crouch or prone behind obstacle with rifle or any other gun to avoid hit or bolt action or to reload and continue shoot and take down nearby or distant enemy as best as I can, thats it.

I think you are too fixed with some places. With this only and same monotonous tactic (focusing only primary on the church and hold that flag at any cost even with one man, keeping an eye on that or this flag as the "only means" to get victory (e.g. stress for city on Aberdeen)) each game must be boring after some time. It seems to lack dynamics and entertainment of spontaneous battlefield and what can happen on the map somewhere else even with advance or retreat situations each game. Sure, namely church-flag on the Market Garden map is last designed location for Germans to capture and naturally after that they deploy their lines which are based on the church flag in order to repel enemy counterattack from the norh via access road and/or defend positions against enemy paratroopers from their dropzone. With that flag in German´s possession (even with one man) there can be situation to restrain part of enemy units, while for example teammates have a better chance to breakthrough over the bridges and clear the city or something similar. Nothing against it. But is it really "one and only" key to win? Map is big, there is a lot of time and particularly the church position is one of four flags. And in order to win, combats, actions and heroism always take place over the whole area. Let a bit leeway to the battleground´s course.

Someone looks to the enemy eyes in the furious hand to hand combat, another just drinks coffee and sends heavy shells on your head. War isnt just a fair affair, but everybody do their jobs. Anyway even a operator of artillery barrage on the battleships must be useful and according to that Abas´performance with almost hundred hits, only one tk and with clean "death state", it seems he also contributed to the final team´s victory. Regardless of where he was and what and how he only skill did the entire game, effective artillery fire fixes opponents on the spot, causes their considerable losses and thereby supports and helps own teammates on their actions and moves for their objectives.

But have to say, gg to the Japs as well, according to the time and tickets on the screenshot, they were holding really fast to the very end and even with Abas´deadly salvos, Marines almost bled white in their effort to capture island.

Has it to do with today´s problematic function and cheaters on the server or it´s just coincidence? Afternoon server in one moment became laggy for everyone and within a moment even some clowns with hacks and cheats appeared in the game. After their ban by one of admins server became laggy again and soon it was emptied completely.