Energy is the future.

bud · 2016-01-21 02:53:59

But it isnt dwindling right now, infact the market is flooded with oil. New technics allows for "old" fields to be opened again, before they could get out a quarter or so of the oil but now they get if not all then most of it. I dont remember exactly, but check the documentary "Planet Oil" its well worth watching.

also putin vs saudi
https://www.google.se/search?q=putin+oi … +war+saudi

Chibi · 2016-01-21 03:00:56

Both the US and Europe use significantly less oil now than before 2008, a sure sign of weakened economies. People drive less and have adapted habits to the new reality. Oil may be "flooding" the markets, but it's increasingly of a lower-quality, lower-EROEI variety, and therein lies the problem. If one accounts for EROEI, supply may not even be increasing at all, despite some millions of barrels per day of capacity having been put online.
While being a net exporter is a "world of hurt" right now, it's worse than being a net importer in the long-term, which is the fate of most of the Western world besides a few select countries.

Last edited by Chibi (2016-01-21 03:02:08)

Count ComBat · 2016-01-21 16:17:59

I always was hoping for the development of the cold fusion, havnt heard anything new in this field for ages meanwhile thou.. See, all ya puzzle freaks out there, just go n do something in this matter..

bud · 2016-01-21 21:54:04

Count ComBat wrote:

I always was hoping for the development of the cold fusion, havnt heard anything new in this field for ages

http://energycatalyzer3.com/e-cat/rossi … ean-energy

Chibi · 2016-01-22 01:58:57

Rossi's schemes and ploys have been debunked so thoroughly it's embarrassing to see people still linking to his "projects". He's nothing but a con-artist and fraudster. It would've been neat if it were to reach fruition in the future though.

http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi … g-methods/
http://shutdownrossi.com/

bud · 2016-01-22 04:52:30

Lol yeah maybe so, but its more interesting to read what NASA write about the subject. Rossi may be a tool, but there many others that is interested in this.

NASA wrote:

Tests conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center and elsewhere consistently show evidence of anomalous heat during gaseous loading and unloading of deuterium into and out of bulk palladium. At one time called cold fusion, now called low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), such effects are now published in peer-reviewed journals and are gaining attention and mainstream respectability.

(scroll down to bottom) http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/sensors/PhySen/research.htm

bud · 2016-01-22 04:59:31

Found a vid but i think its old, like 2009 ish, dont think it lead anywhere.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8vH5OOsMpA

HoOK · 2016-01-22 05:03:42

Yea i have fusion core in my armor suit in FALLOUT4
Bud i hacked your pc ur ip is 127.0.0.1

Last edited by HoOK (2016-01-22 05:05:14)

bud · 2016-01-22 06:07:59

well see if you can find my porn then, cant find the home made ones.

Pleiades53 · 2016-02-05 21:28:36

WICKED COOL!!!!!!!!!!!
Leave it to the German Engineering.

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/germany-make … 53294.html

Circular employed at the Department of Redundancy Department.

ATF_SurrenderMonkey · 2016-02-06 02:02:29

???
women crashes own funeral or thieving monkey bound and caged? wth1!!!!!

bud · 2016-02-06 04:26:56

this i guess http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-We … 02165.html

Pleiades53 · 2016-02-08 14:51:53

THANK you bud............THAT was the correct link!
:-)

ATF_SurrenderMonkey · 2016-02-19 01:18:25

To validate your energy concerns.....please buy me the attached and deliver to my tree!!!
http://www.lexus.com/concept/LFFC/

Pleiades53 · 2016-02-19 01:56:51

Your asking an awful lot my friend.
How will I lift it into the tree?????

bud · 2016-08-17 05:08:44

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8utkoK2DhA

Arkos · 2016-08-17 12:57:35

...

I guess before Cold fusion world will use HE3. 10'000 less radioactivity then normal reactors and nearly unlimited. Eceladus is a good candidat. 1 Bar pressure and gravity like mars. It means you can go out only with an Airc supply.

At the end, robots and harvesters will do the work. At this point you can also build new ships which doesn't need 90% of capacity for fuel.

...

Last edited by Arkos (2016-08-17 13:01:01)

Pleiades53 · 2016-08-17 14:35:42

T H A T .... was wicked bud!
:-)

bud · 2016-08-18 00:37:29

Yeah its cool, its not cost effective in the video (those radiovawes use to much power) but maybe sometime in the future someone gets another idea that could move things forward.

Pleiades53 · 2016-08-18 15:32:12

I see EVERY advance into new technology, as being possible to find less cost energy that is also cleaner and either renewable or limitless per se. There is indeed possibility here if the radio waves can be modulated to duplicate the frequency or doubled if the same harmonics will occur at higher freqs. One NEVER knows!
THANKS bud!

Arkos · 2016-08-19 13:56:47

...

In the tests for the Fusion the lasershots which beeing used to start the fusion take same power like a big town in a year. Before some time they recieved more power back, as they put in. But i doubt that it will work as expected. Fusion needs heavy gravity too, which we can't generate artificially. As alternative they use Lasers, shooting on the molecules. But the real problem ... until now there's no chain reaction.

...

Last edited by Arkos (2016-08-19 13:57:12)

Pleiades53 · 2016-08-20 19:17:33

Odd that even in the current EIA site, no mention of future potential sources or tech advances. Makes me wonder some days. 2014 and updates are slow here typically. Also some of the literature is incorrect yet posted. Heating oil futures and price outlooks. There must be another source of tech searching on the Govts levels of all Nations soon. Perhaps a consortium.
http://www.eia.gov/

bud · 2016-08-20 20:30:01

Hm there seem to be a unwillingness to some degree to use the science available, or how i should put it, for example the research in fusion tech have been hold back here (in sweden) for decades. Now fusion will never be some free energy source, but with the type they are using now they only use about 1% of the energy in the fuel. As i understand it, they could build reactors that could run on the waste and with much higher effeciency and thus render the waste product down.

Breeder reactors could, in principle, extract almost all of the energy contained in uranium or thorium, decreasing fuel requirements by a factor of 100

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_r … lear_waste

Scientifists here has been trying to get permit (also for ages) to build a research reactor (thorium i think), they finally got a go, but then we got a new guvernment after the selection 2014 and they immediatelly shut it down first thing. Those guys didnt give up tho, but moved the whole project to Canada where they where welcomed with open arms.

Then we have China witch have understand how important energy is for a country, they are building nuclear powerplants and solarpanels and waterpower as fast as they can possibly do it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Gorges_Dam

More about Thorium if your interested

Thorium power has other attractions, too. Its production of nuclear waste would be orders of magnitude lower than conventional nuclear power

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ … ar-energy/

Arkos · 2016-08-21 14:53:20

...

In 10 years new reactors can be build. The Prototype is allready running. This "New Generation" of reactors can burn the waste from old reactors. The time comes, where countries and companies fight for NPP Waste.

...

Pleiades53 · 2016-08-21 17:56:26

I SOOooooOOoo hope you are right!!
:-)

Arkos wrote:

...
In 10 years new reactors can be build. The Prototype is allready running. This "New Generation" of reactors can burn the waste from old reactors. The time comes, where countries and companies fight for NPP Waste.
...

bud · 2016-08-21 21:58:38

Also one can synthesis gold

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis … etals#Gold

Only the mercury isotope 196Hg, which occurs with a frequency of 0.15% in natural mercury, can be converted to gold by slow neutron capture, and following electron capture, decay into gold's only stable isotope, 197Au.

Last edited by bud (2016-08-21 22:00:15)

Arkos · 2016-08-21 22:56:35

...

Gold not possible... Diamands ok, but Gold never...

...

You know... Gold (79 protons) or let's say all heavy elements with more then 26 protons got produced after the reaction stopped in a star just in that moment when the iron got builded and the fusion stopped. > Due the falling H to the center hitting the IronCore those elemets got builded. The temperaturs are several 100'000'000'000'000 degrees.

And those processes mostly are generated in twin stars. When the one changed into a neutronStar and takes H from the other... another second reaction starts.

It's also possible in very big big stars... more then 10times bigger then ouer sun.

...

Last edited by Arkos (2016-08-21 23:25:24)

bud · 2016-08-21 23:11:23

Arkos wrote:

Gold not possible... Diamands ok, but Gold never...

Check again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTiGrNLFH2g

Arkos · 2016-08-21 23:18:22

...

If, then it's only usefull if it's payable... like diamonds.

I anyway never understood, why diamonds are such expensive. Diamonds are not rare, but smaragds are.

I guess it's the same story with scots skirts. Everybody believes it's a tradition, but it's only know since 1904 or so. The market for Diamonds were pushed in the 50's. Before it was just a hard stone used for drilling, machine industry etc.

...

Last edited by Arkos (2016-08-21 23:19:55)

Arkos · 2016-08-21 23:27:12

...

If you would understand german then i would recommend this guy. Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch. (Alpha Centauri).

http://www.br.de/fernsehen/ard-alpha/se … os100.html

Each stream is 15 minutes... This guy is great.

...

Last edited by Arkos (2016-08-21 23:27:43)

SiMPLE | Forum

Announcement

#31 2016-01-21 02:53:59

Re: Energy is the future.

#32 2016-01-21 03:00:56

Re: Energy is the future.

#33 2016-01-21 16:17:59

Re: Energy is the future.

#34 2016-01-21 21:54:04

Re: Energy is the future.

#35 2016-01-22 01:58:57

Re: Energy is the future.

#36 2016-01-22 04:52:30

Re: Energy is the future.

#37 2016-01-22 04:59:31

Re: Energy is the future.

#38 2016-01-22 05:03:42

Re: Energy is the future.

#39 2016-01-22 06:07:59

Re: Energy is the future.

#40 2016-02-05 21:28:36

Re: Energy is the future.

#41 2016-02-06 02:02:29

Re: Energy is the future.

#42 2016-02-06 04:26:56

Re: Energy is the future.

#43 2016-02-08 14:51:53

Re: Energy is the future.

#44 2016-02-19 01:18:25

Re: Energy is the future.

#45 2016-02-19 01:56:51

Re: Energy is the future.

#46 2016-08-17 05:08:44

Re: Energy is the future.

#47 2016-08-17 12:57:35

Re: Energy is the future.

#48 2016-08-17 14:35:42

Re: Energy is the future.

#49 2016-08-18 00:37:29

Re: Energy is the future.

#50 2016-08-18 15:32:12

Re: Energy is the future.

#51 2016-08-19 13:56:47

Re: Energy is the future.

#52 2016-08-20 19:17:33

Re: Energy is the future.

#53 2016-08-20 20:30:01

Re: Energy is the future.

#54 2016-08-21 14:53:20

Re: Energy is the future.

#55 2016-08-21 17:56:26

Re: Energy is the future.

#56 2016-08-21 21:58:38

Re: Energy is the future.

#57 2016-08-21 22:56:35

Re: Energy is the future.

#58 2016-08-21 23:11:23

Re: Energy is the future.

#59 2016-08-21 23:18:22

Re: Energy is the future.

#60 2016-08-21 23:27:12

Re: Energy is the future.

Board footer