another "TAXI" clarification

joint · 2013-09-03 00:46:59

whether you allowed or not to drive up to the aircraft by jeep, if you dont hit/block anyone???
p.s.i know it was discussed many times, but i belive there still no consensus among admins about it
i'll agree with any, just want a certainty in this issue:D

Last edited by joint (2013-09-03 00:47:46)

seventy · 2013-09-03 00:49:26

I think you will get the same answers here as before

MuSeN · 2013-09-03 08:36:16

It is disruptive behaviour, and I will keep kicking for it, as I kicked you last night.

And that is a certainty

Last edited by MuSeN (2013-09-03 08:37:26)

joint · 2013-09-03 09:33:07

fine fellow!:D just do all the same pls, because as experience shows half of admins wouldnt kick for this

MuSeN · 2013-09-03 09:47:09

joint wrote:

fine fellow!:D just do all the same pls, because as experience shows half of admins wouldnt kick for this

Dont demand too much of the poor admins, half of them dont even know all the rules but are just trying to do their best. I agree on that the different interpretation of taxi is a problem, so I really hope we wont see admins kicking others for it but then doing it themselves. I personally try to follow the rules as well as possible, two nights ago on iwo I beached the PoW, naturally I gave myself a !kdis so someone less noobish could take it (I belive the next person managed to wiggle it loose )

Denny · 2013-09-03 11:30:06

i see some other admins taxiing, then i just warn them..cause i know they will cry on forum later

Zody · 2013-09-03 11:47:45

You guys should stick to what tuia said! Taxing is allowed.

ziba128 · 2013-09-03 12:59:50

Zody wrote:

You guys should stick to what tuia said!

Who is it? There are a lot of pro admins and they don't need any advice.

Ticket_to_Death · 2013-09-03 13:00:27

Zody wrote:

You guys should stick to what tuia said! Taxing is allowed.

+1

It is not up to us to make up the rules here I also taxiëd, just because it's allowed. I don't care about the rest.

dary · 2013-09-03 13:21:57

Denny wrote:

i see some other admins taxiing, then i just warn them..cause i know they will cry on forum later

1. Kicking other admins isn't allowed

2. Taxi is allowed

Of course they will complain, what do you think?!

moon' · 2013-09-03 13:25:20

dary wrote:

Denny wrote:
i see some other admins taxiing, then i just warn them..cause i know they will cry on forum later
1. Kicking other admins isn't allowed
2. Taxi is allowed
Of course they will complain, what do you think?!

I interfere and help good old Denny: Taxi is allowed yes ofc but its disruptive behavior and thats not allowed so its a case of ''????''
Denny ''doesnt''(?) kick other admins he only warns otherwise admins could break all rules without anyone doing something.

dary · 2013-09-03 14:09:51

This rules maked sense, but all admins should still act the same. Not like one kicks for taxi and the other not. I just kick if they park the jeep in front of the plane or something.

Ticket_to_Death · 2013-09-03 14:11:47

I don't understand why taxiing should be disruptive..?

nämeless · 2013-09-03 14:17:06

sunny-штаны wrote:

pro admins

What is the English for "задрот"?

dary · 2013-09-03 14:27:11

Ticket_to_Death wrote:

I don't understand why taxiing should be disruptive..?

Because you can crash a plane or park the jeep in a unfavourable place. Or if you drive with the jeep over the plane-spawn and the plane spawns at the same time, you will destroy the plane. Not every knows where the planes spawn, that is why it shouldn't be allowed. If you use the jeep, make sure you drive around the spawn and park the jeep behind the plane on a safe place. Taxi to airfield is as well a waste of a jeep, even though there are enough modded jeeps. It is just selfish gameplay, but if tuia says it is fine to use the taxi, i will just use it as well. Same chance for everyone.

Last edited by dary (2013-09-03 14:28:04)

Denny · 2013-09-03 14:31:03

ok u will see me on bocage taxing with tiger then

nämeless · 2013-09-03 14:35:57

GUN|BF.MuSeN wrote:

It is disruptive behaviour, and I will keep kicking for it

1: You will be fined for hogging the middle lane!
2: But inspector, this is a one-lane road. Look at the road ahead, look at the traffic sign!
1: I don't care! I think it's disruptive and you will be fined!

Last edited by nämeless (2013-09-03 14:36:45)

DrOnzzER · 2013-09-03 15:21:08

Well if i may.. I would suggest.. that taxing at start of game should not be allowed...because in start when i have to rush 4 flag..all jeep goes in wrong direction..nd that annoys a lot...

MuSeN · 2013-09-03 15:27:25

I will kick anyone I see doing taxi, including admins. You all know that with taxi enabled we will end up with tons of crashes into planes and useful vehicles going to waste. Yeah some of you know where the planes spawn, but noobs will follow your example. It is better for the server not to follow Tuia's instructions in this case.

dary · 2013-09-03 15:42:31

Lecter wrote:

Warning: Next admin who kicks any other admin will have its admins rights immediatley revoked.

Ticket_to_Death · 2013-09-03 15:54:07

GUN|BF.MuSeN wrote:

I will kick anyone I see doing taxi, including admins. You all know that with taxi enabled we will end up with tons of crashes into planes and useful vehicles going to waste. Yeah some of you know where the planes spawn, but noobs will follow your example. It is better for the server not to follow Tuia's instructions in this case.

Why so serious?

say · 2013-09-03 16:01:05

Everyone just start using it again all admins 24/7 & w8 for reaction... maybe later they realize its disrupting .It could be funny to see everyone blocking planes at airfields with all vehicles.

dary · 2013-09-03 16:15:30

say wrote:

Everyone just start using it again all admins 24/7 & w8 for reaction... maybe later they realize its disrupting .It could be funny to see everyone blocking planes at airfields with all vehicles.

It is only allowed to drive to the airfield if you don't fucking block, crash or whatever anything!!! It is common sense.

dary · 2013-09-03 16:16:42

And why is taxi to airfield allowed again?

Because Sydrum kicked for taxi on Battle of Britain. hahaha

Last edited by dary (2013-09-03 16:17:49)

say · 2013-09-03 16:28:03

Kobra · 2013-09-03 17:13:25

I'm with Musen in this case but taxiing on BoB does not count

MuSeN · 2013-09-03 18:01:40

dary wrote:

Lecter wrote:
Warning: Next admin who kicks any other admin will have its admins rights immediatley revoked.

Seems like there is a golden opportunity for someone to get rid of my admin rights but dont you worry, I have tk to continue with and as an IT-consultant avoiding bans is the least of my problems Victory shall be mine! Muahahahaha!

dary · 2013-09-03 18:06:38

Kobra wrote:

I'm with Musen in this case but taxiing on BoB does not count

Everybody agrees that taxi has to be forbidden... but that's not the point. We already talked about this but tuia said that from now on taxi is allowed.

And tuia is the one, who pays for the server, not you, not Musen or me. It has something to do with respect to follow the rules even if we don't agree with it. It is just senseless if some people kick for taxi and others not.

Maybe we should push this topic into the admin section.

dary · 2013-09-03 18:09:20

GUN|BF.MuSeN wrote:

dary wrote:
Lecter wrote:
Warning: Next admin who kicks any other admin will have its admins rights immediatley revoked.
Seems like there is a golden opportunity for someone to get rid of my admin rights but dont you worry, I have tk to continue with and as an IT-consultant avoiding bans is the least of my problems Victory shall be mine! Muahahahaha!

After that around 100 admins got kicked by admins.

seventy · 2013-09-03 18:11:25

I agree, this is a tuiamocracy (no sarcasm intended), and yes please move this thread to the admin section.

SiMPLE | Forum

Announcement

#1 2013-09-03 00:46:59

another "TAXI" clarification

#2 2013-09-03 00:49:26

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#3 2013-09-03 08:36:16

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#4 2013-09-03 09:33:07

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#5 2013-09-03 09:47:09

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#6 2013-09-03 11:30:06

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#7 2013-09-03 11:47:45

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#8 2013-09-03 12:59:50

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#9 2013-09-03 13:00:27

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#10 2013-09-03 13:21:57

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#11 2013-09-03 13:25:20

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#12 2013-09-03 14:09:51

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#13 2013-09-03 14:11:47

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#14 2013-09-03 14:17:06

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#15 2013-09-03 14:27:11

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#16 2013-09-03 14:31:03

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#17 2013-09-03 14:35:57

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#18 2013-09-03 15:21:08

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#19 2013-09-03 15:27:25

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#20 2013-09-03 15:42:31

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#21 2013-09-03 15:54:07

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#22 2013-09-03 16:01:05

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#23 2013-09-03 16:15:30

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#24 2013-09-03 16:16:42

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#25 2013-09-03 16:28:03

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#26 2013-09-03 17:13:25

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#27 2013-09-03 18:01:40

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#28 2013-09-03 18:06:38

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#29 2013-09-03 18:09:20

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

#30 2013-09-03 18:11:25

Re: another "TAXI" clarification

Board footer