You are not logged in.
Tuia,
I think you are on to something here. The Romans used decimation to punish the ranks for cowardice and incompetence. You might want to consider weeding out the incompetent admins by this method.
Take all the admins line them up by there date of jointing SIMPLE. Start with the newest is order to the oldest. Put them in groups of 10 to be voted on by the plebeians.
The one that has the most votes have there admin rights removed. This is a simple fair way to reduce the admin population by 10 percent and it would be democratic at the same time.
What say you?
Don't ban them remove their admin rights.
In most of cases, more active is an admin on the server, more haters he has so there is nothing unexpected.
In most of cases, more active is an admin on the server, more haters he has so there is nothing unexpected.
Paul,
Don't be ridiculous, look at the forums, It is replete with admin abuse situations. Many admins troll the player in support of their fellow abusing admins. If you don't see the admin abuse problem then maybe you are part of it?
I would like to add that the choices of Admins I made from the poll aren't the only Admins who have taken action against me. Some of the others on the list have as well, but none of those ones have targeted me for personal reasons. There is no point going into details. It simply leads to rebuttal ad nauseum. But if any of the Admins in my shit list wants to wager their Admin rights in a 1vs1 against me that's fine. They lose, they surrender their Admin rights. I lose, they get to ban me for however long they like. Think of it guys, you could get rid of me forever. You know you want to.
Paul Baumer wrote:In most of cases, more active is an admin on the server, more haters he has so there is nothing unexpected.
Paul,
Don't be ridiculous, look at the forums, It is replete with admin abuse situations. Many admins troll the player in support of their fellow abusing admins. If you don't see the admin abuse problem then maybe you are part of it?
Sound like ......... a shut up Dak!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQuIWjnyaPU
I would like to add that the choices of Admins I made from the poll aren't the only Admins who have taken action against me. Some of the others on the list have as well, but none of those ones have targeted me for personal reasons. There is no point going into details. It simply leads to rebuttal ad nauseum. But if any of the Admins in my shit list wants to wager their Admin rights in a 1vs1 against me that's fine. They lose, they surrender their Admin rights. I lose, they get to ban me for however long they like. Think of it guys, you could get rid of me forever. You know you want to.
.. 2easy!!! ive won several times. and im with m10 against you in the tiger. its 2 easy.
Please cancel my vote, I changed my mind.
Proof Coon. You've got no proof. Set up a 1vs1 with live stream recording. You win you get to ban me for as long as you like. Lose? Those precious Admin rights you abuse are, gone. . .
And I'm not even trying to swap places with you, Coon. I am trying to level the field.
Please cancel my vote, I changed my mind.
you talk like an american
Some of those that WORK FORCES are the same that BURN CROSSES
Sonic wrote:Please cancel my vote, I changed my mind.
you talk like an american
Hehe, well if possible offcourse.
Since I dont see anybody respecting the requirement to say who and WHY they want to vote against then this is just a hater contest and voters should be public.
Also many admins are fake nicking a lot so its not fair for 3-4 of us that use our normal names almost always and are way more active on server than the rest
Karslon@ why do you think I care-vote for you??
Mamba@ what happened last night answers your question? (we will keep playing , you will keep trying to join us and we will keep ignoring you)
Last edited by gio (2018-01-27 13:54:26)
This is what the current forum rules say:
Breaking the rules may result in your post being removed or edited. Repeatedly breaking the rules may result in a temporary or permanent ban.
I got limmited to 1 post and 1 pm per day for unknown reasons and no warning, and there is no rule that justify such measure. Introduce such rule and present arguments and ban me or fix my account!
Admin staff purge cannot be resolved with votes in the forum. take this for example:
tuia,
xp fanatic,
simon,
deeko,
Arwen,
Hydra{SRB},
Viitapiru,
Paul Baumer,
Flettnerman,
Red Scorpion,
Zody,
ABAS,
ziba128,
(BB)DinkW,
sh4rpsh00ter,
bloody[CHN],
The SiLeNt SniPeR,
Coco,
persia,
hanyweh,
Satinca,
Sparrow,
Arkos,
Sonic,
Anna Nym,
Russ,
KarlsoN,
LL22,
petr8,
M1ke,
KIN,
T-BONE,
Vojislav,
PipeR,
joint,
jime1,
Maasika,
Knaso,
Black Mamba,
moon',
LuccaWulf,
Whoopz,
Outlaw,
Ks Myaz,
Zatoichi,
lonewolf-mcquade,
Omen,
Trench,
[ECGN]BladeRunner,
Sepp,
janet reno (TX),
dary,
valento,
Dakota,
Sommarel,
bud,
Moss,
Kobra,
co0nic,
Alvarez-Latino,
e.S
That's a list of people who visited the forums today, more than half of them are admins on one of the servers, good percentage of them are people who got just banned or have been banned more than once in tha past, so their vote is more or less personal agenda against the people who banned them(some of them have multiple accounts), less than 10 % are random people who are here for other reasons(1 % or half of those 20 new registrations that bud mentions are people that got banned on ax but can't post ban appeal because the block for new registrations on their site). The majority of people that play on simple fra (the largest vanilla server) don't know and don't really care who the admins are. Most of them don't visit the forums. They play in the prime time depending on their location (asia - europe - us) and switch between simple and ax, depending on which one has more poeple , and which one has free slots.
What you are doing with this poll is to check what admins think about each other(where the largest "cartels"/clanners will win against independent admins), and which admins are more persistent in banning certain individuals.
What you should do instead is - introduce better rules, and include all the new interpretations for which people have been banned last 12 months (rule for teamkilling , better rule for pixelling/using artillery from main base (anti camp protected) on maps without planes, new rule for the names (ban default names player/bfsoldier, which names are found offensive/impersonating - does Нудга[KNUR] if you have cyrillic patch or: for the majority of people who don't have that patch deserve the ban i got or not?, Should Hitler/Stalin name be ok but Ante Gotovina get's you 1 week ban?) Is sniping on enemy scouts inside uncapturable base allowed ?), is picking team at start of the game - stacking and does it deserve kick ? You resolve and fix the rules list according to all the bans from the last year that are not inline with the current list, make sure all admins accept them and there won't be other interpretations. It should be clear to everyone who read the rules in which cases admins will apply warnings , kicks , temp bans or permannent bans.
This is what the current forum rules say:
forum rules wrote:Breaking the rules may result in your post being removed or edited. Repeatedly breaking the rules may result in a temporary or permanent ban.
I got limmited to 1 post and 1 pm per day for unknown reasons and no warning, and there is no rule that justify such measure. Introduce such rule and present arguments and ban me or fix my account!
Admin staff purge cannot be resolved with votes in the forum. take this for example:
Online today wrote:tuia,
xp fanatic,
simon,
deeko,
Arwen,
Hydra{SRB},
Viitapiru,
Paul Baumer,
Flettnerman,
Red Scorpion,
Zody,
ABAS,
ziba128,
(BB)DinkW,
sh4rpsh00ter,
bloody[CHN],
The SiLeNt SniPeR,
Coco,
persia,
hanyweh,
Satinca,
Sparrow,
Arkos,
Sonic,
Anna Nym,
Russ,
KarlsoN,
LL22,
petr8,
M1ke,
KIN,
T-BONE,
Vojislav,
PipeR,
joint,
jime1,
Maasika,
Knaso,
Black Mamba,
moon',
LuccaWulf,
Whoopz,
Outlaw,
Ks Myaz,
Zatoichi,
lonewolf-mcquade,
Omen,
Trench,
[ECGN]BladeRunner,
Sepp,
janet reno (TX),
dary,
valento,
Dakota,
Sommarel,
bud,
Moss,
Kobra,
co0nic,
Alvarez-Latino,
e.SThat's a list of people who visited the forums today, more than half of them are admins on one of the servers, good percentage of them are people who got just banned or have been banned more than once in tha past, so their vote is more or less personal agenda against the people who banned them(some of them have multiple accounts), less than 10 % are random people who are here for other reasons(1 % or half of those 20 new registrations that bud mentions are people that got banned on ax but can't post ban appeal because the block for new registrations on their site). The majority of people that play on simple fra (the largest vanilla server) don't know and don't really care who the admins are. Most of them don't visit the forums. They play in the prime time depending on their location (asia - europe - us) and switch between simple and ax, depending on which one has more poeple , and which one has free slots.
What you are doing with this poll is to check what admins think about each other(where the largest "cartels"/clanners will win against independent admins), and which admins are more persistent in banning certain individuals.
What you should do instead is - introduce better rules, and include all the new interpretations for which people have been banned last 12 months (rule for teamkilling , better rule for pixelling/using artillery from main base (anti camp protected) on maps without planes, new rule for the names (ban default names player/bfsoldier, which names are found offensive/impersonating - does Нудга[KNUR] if you have cyrillic patch or: https://i.imgur.com/prGHky3.png for the majority of people who don't have that patch deserve the ban i got or not?, Should Hitler/Stalin name be ok but Ante Gotovina get's you 1 week ban?) Is sniping on enemy scouts inside uncapturable base allowed ?), is picking team at start of the game - stacking and does it deserve kick ? You resolve and fix the rules list according to all the bans from the last year that are not inline with the current list, make sure all admins accept them and there won't be other interpretations. It should be clear to everyone who read the rules in which cases admins will apply warnings , kicks , temp bans or permannent bans.
-Offensive or blank player names are not allowed.
Ante Gotovina is banned because he came to server and said HELLO MY NAME IS ANTE GOTOVINA FRIEND OF SERBIAN PEOPLE!
I would do it again.
-Since it's a WW2 game, names related to events of that era are acceptible. (Hitler, Stalin, SS etc.)
-Active snipers can get sniped.
thats from server rules
Last edited by Hydra{SRB} (2018-01-27 15:09:23)
Why: Because of retarded Putin lover.
...
names are found offensive/impersonating - does Нудга[KNUR]
...
Cmon, bury the stewardess already.
Sepp wrote:I would like to add that the choices of Admins I made from the poll aren't the only Admins who have taken action against me. Some of the others on the list have as well, but none of those ones have targeted me for personal reasons. There is no point going into details. It simply leads to rebuttal ad nauseum. But if any of the Admins in my shit list wants to wager their Admin rights in a 1vs1 against me that's fine. They lose, they surrender their Admin rights. I lose, they get to ban me for however long they like. Think of it guys, you could get rid of me forever. You know you want to.
.. 2easy!!! ive won several times. and im with m10 against you in the tiger. its 2 easy.
The only thing easy for you Coon, is avoiding 1vs1 against me with the same poor excuse every time. I can always comb through the posts over the YEARS now and demonstrate this to everyone on the forum but that would clog it up. Why don't we settle this issue the proper way. Once, and for all. A 1vs1 Aberdeen between me and you. It must be recorded by an independent observer and the result put on the forum for everyone to see. The stakes are, I lose - you get to ban me for however long you like. Permanent ban if you wish. You lose? Those Admin rights you are abusing you surrender and become a mere mortal like the rest of us.
lol, no problem. tonight. 20o'clock. cet. gun server. aberdeen or tank arena, u decide.
so, will you remove Jazzys rights?
every 3rd dislikes Jazzy lol
lol, no problem. tonight. 20o'clock. cet. gun server. aberdeen or tank arena, u decide.
Aberdeen. There must be rules agreed. Three 20 minute rounds first to 10 kills takes the round. No mines, no ex-packs. Just the wrench, you die with your tank. Are those agreeable?
It should be live stream recorded by an independent observer, can we have someone out there from the forum offer to do this, guys?
I voted for viita
Ban viita pleaase.
Let the hate flow through you.
You've gone too deep into darkside, they must end this!
People who is too innocent here on simple community must be dealt with. They are the true bad guys.