Sweden

moon' · 2017-04-23 00:13:54

Sunshine wrote:

Diversion theory... as in the interbreeding and movement of the species? Not easy to find info online. You have any more?
I Have a genetics class in the fall and will learn all anout this stuff. It's very interesting!

I doubt that you will actually learn anything interesting in the US about genetics
USA seems to like censoring these things
Look at Richard Lynn or Arthur Jensen, they are/were proffesors who's word is labeled as 'Scientific racism'

seventy wrote:

You will never be able to compete with these genetics experts in this forum

I don't think most people on the forum call themselves genetic experts, but just use logical and clear thinking on the matter(s)
I think everyone can see the differences in genetics, but almost noone dares to acknowledge them /or/ tries to convice themselves that there is no distinction between the subjects because it is 'wrong' to think that or to speculate about it in most countries (Incl. your Germany)

Last edited by moon' (2017-04-23 00:17:29)

Sunshine · 2017-04-23 00:41:13

moon' wrote:

Sunshine wrote:
Diversion theory... as in the interbreeding and movement of the species? Not easy to find info online. You have any more?
I Have a genetics class in the fall and will learn all anout this stuff. It's very interesting!
I doubt that you will actually learn anything interesting in the US about genetics
USA seems to like censoring these things
Look at Richard Lynn or Arthur Jensen, they are/were proffesors who's word is labeled as 'Scientific racism'

Maybe when you go to a very liberal school. Arhtur Jensen was at Berkeley... nuff said lol. I've had plenty of professors who have said things some "sensitive" people wouldn't like lol that wasn't even science related. I'm getting a degree in biomedical engineering. Big difference than liberal art babies or pre-psych students who always are the ones whining.

Zody · 2017-04-23 01:03:02

Sunshine wrote:

moon' wrote:
Sunshine wrote:
Diversion theory... as in the interbreeding and movement of the species? Not easy to find info online. You have any more?
I Have a genetics class in the fall and will learn all anout this stuff. It's very interesting!
I doubt that you will actually learn anything interesting in the US about genetics
USA seems to like censoring these things
Look at Richard Lynn or Arthur Jensen, they are/were proffesors who's word is labeled as 'Scientific racism'
Maybe when you go to a very liberal school. Arhtur Jensen was at Berkeley... nuff said lol. I've had plenty of professors who have said things some "sensitive" people wouldn't like lol that wasn't even science related. I'm getting a degree in biomedical engineering. Big difference than liberal art babies or pre-psych students who always are the ones whining.

Not good enough for real engineering? ... nuff said lol.

bud · 2017-04-23 17:16:07

Sunshine wrote:

Diversion theory... as in the interbreeding and movement of the species? Not easy to find info online. You have any more?
I Have a genetics class in the fall and will learn all anout this stuff. It's very interesting!

Its a theory called "The 'Out of Africa' Hypothesis" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262934/

Or wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_Af … ern_humans
---
Some thought for thoughts.

Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa by about 200,000 years ago.

Due to accumulating genetic and fossil evidence suggesting Neanderthals evolved in Europe separately from modern humans in Africa for over 600,000 years

Last edited by bud (2017-04-23 17:17:47)

moon' · 2017-04-23 18:01:23

bud wrote:

Its a theory called "The 'Out of Africa' Hypothesis" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262934/
Or wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_Af … ern_humans
---
Some thought for thoughts.
Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa by about 200,000 years ago.
Due to accumulating genetic and fossil evidence suggesting Neanderthals evolved in Europe separately from modern humans in Africa for over 600,000 years

The Petralona skull already debunked the out of Africa theory years ago
An 800.000 year old skull that looks like a modern European

Maasika · 2017-04-23 19:15:38

Evolution at work:
-which one`s you think were more succesfull: those who tried to outrun a lion or rhino or those who tried to outwrestle them?

HoOK · 2017-04-23 23:34:50

so this topic went about caveman ?

bud · 2017-04-24 00:03:14

moon' wrote:

The Petralona skull already debunked the out of Africa theory years ago
An 800.000 year old skull that looks like a modern European

Interesting, first time i heard of this.

Sunshine · 2017-04-24 10:35:46

Zody wrote:

Not good enough for real engineering? ... nuff said lol.

Blah to you.

janet reno (TX) · 2017-04-25 06:41:07

Until determining the age of the Petralona skull at ~700,000 years, all human fossils before around 400,000 years were considered as belonging to one species of Homo erectus , for example, ‘Beijing man’ (500,000 years), Java man (900,000 years), or other African exemplars (around 1.1 million years).

Recapitulating the facts and the surrounding framework concerning the Petralona skull, initially it was considered by P. Kokkoros and A. Kanellis, Professors of Thessaloniki University, that it represented an unstratified female Neanderthal of ~50,000-70,000 years ago. The same age was given in 1964 by two German researchers, O. Sickenberg in Paleontology and E. Breitinger in Anthropology, the latter declaring that Petralona man is “the first African out of Africa”.

When Dr Aris Poulianos had the opportunity to study the skull, he immediately highlighted the European traits of the male Petralona man. In 1968, and again from 1975 to 1983, he excavated the Petralona cave, proving that the human skull belonged to a well evident stratigraphic sequence (corresponding to the 11th layer), of 700,000 years old, presenting its own Paleolithic culture, not to mention the oldest traces of fire ever kindled by a human being. The above mentioned professor, O. Sickenberg, with the help of his pupil G. Shutt, indirectly agreed with Dr Aris Poulianos concerning the date of 700,000 years before passing away by the end of 1970.

The initial international reaction was that no humans could exist at that age out of Africa in Europe. Therefore, Dr Aris Poulianos’ theory was seen as exaggerated. However, during the next decades due also to Petralona excavating data, other European Palaeo-anthropological sites were proven to be of an analogous age (700,000 years), such as Mauer (Germany), Isernia (Italy) or Boxgrove (England). The scientific “wind” started slowly to “blow” in favour of Poulianos. Discoveries such as in Atapuerca (Spain), Ceprano (Italy) or Dmanissi (Caucasus) reconfirmed the initial idea that in Europe the existence of humans could be of 2 million years

Zody · 2017-04-25 23:47:38

janet reno (TX) wrote:

Until determining the age of the Petralona skull at ~700,000 years, all human fossils before around 400,000 years were considered as belonging to one species of Homo erectus , for example, ‘Beijing man’ (500,000 years), Java man (900,000 years), or other African exemplars (around 1.1 million years).
Recapitulating the facts and the surrounding framework concerning the Petralona skull, initially it was considered by P. Kokkoros and A. Kanellis, Professors of Thessaloniki University, that it represented an unstratified female Neanderthal of ~50,000-70,000 years ago. The same age was given in 1964 by two German researchers, O. Sickenberg in Paleontology and E. Breitinger in Anthropology, the latter declaring that Petralona man is “the first African out of Africa”.
When Dr Aris Poulianos had the opportunity to study the skull, he immediately highlighted the European traits of the male Petralona man. In 1968, and again from 1975 to 1983, he excavated the Petralona cave, proving that the human skull belonged to a well evident stratigraphic sequence (corresponding to the 11th layer), of 700,000 years old, presenting its own Paleolithic culture, not to mention the oldest traces of fire ever kindled by a human being. The above mentioned professor, O. Sickenberg, with the help of his pupil G. Shutt, indirectly agreed with Dr Aris Poulianos concerning the date of 700,000 years before passing away by the end of 1970.
The initial international reaction was that no humans could exist at that age out of Africa in Europe. Therefore, Dr Aris Poulianos’ theory was seen as exaggerated. However, during the next decades due also to Petralona excavating data, other European Palaeo-anthropological sites were proven to be of an analogous age (700,000 years), such as Mauer (Germany), Isernia (Italy) or Boxgrove (England). The scientific “wind” started slowly to “blow” in favour of Poulianos. Discoveries such as in Atapuerca (Spain), Ceprano (Italy) or Dmanissi (Caucasus) reconfirmed the initial idea that in Europe the existence of humans could be of 2 million years

At least name your source. Great copy paste Cowboy.

janet reno (TX) · 2017-04-26 02:04:49

Look it up yourself. All I am doing is supporting Moon's argument.

joint · 2017-04-26 14:12:31

once i found fossils in the wood, but it turned out it was the squash of squirrels

bud · 2017-04-26 22:02:38

Some new info

A 130,000-Year-Old Mastodon Threatens to Upend Human History

https://www.wired.com/2017/04/130000-ye … n-history/

bud · 2017-05-17 15:14:52

More crazyness from Swesurdistan
-
https://youtu.be/4Sbl7SkHZTs

bud · 2017-05-25 22:37:29

https://youtu.be/K5diJPL9HTg

madara uchiha · 2017-05-27 06:51:00

I just noticed that rapefugees was part 2 of this topic , so where should we debate? I prefer this thread.

razor · 2017-06-03 03:02:35

https://youtu.be/E3cFiWtcT4k

bud · 2017-06-17 01:04:07

Angry Foreigner facebook account locked "for unknown reason"
_
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sass4jgyEUY
-
Compressed version
_
https://youtu.be/3vTL28TqnK4

Zatoichi · 2017-08-25 04:00:12

moon' wrote:

bud wrote:
Its a theory called "The 'Out of Africa' Hypothesis" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262934/
Or wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_Af … ern_humans
---
Some thought for thoughts.
Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa by about 200,000 years ago.
Due to accumulating genetic and fossil evidence suggesting Neanderthals evolved in Europe separately from modern humans in Africa for over 600,000 years
The Petralona skull already debunked the out of Africa theory years ago
An 800.000 year old skull that looks like a modern European

Complete horseshit, don't make things up please

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

Last edited by Zatoichi (2017-08-25 04:01:00)

Zatoichi · 2017-08-25 04:03:12

janet reno (TX) wrote:

Until determining the age of the Petralona skull at ~700,000 years, all human fossils before around 400,000 years were considered as belonging to one species of Homo erectus , for example, ‘Beijing man’ (500,000 years), Java man (900,000 years), or other African exemplars (around 1.1 million years).
Recapitulating the facts and the surrounding framework concerning the Petralona skull, initially it was considered by P. Kokkoros and A. Kanellis, Professors of Thessaloniki University, that it represented an unstratified female Neanderthal of ~50,000-70,000 years ago. The same age was given in 1964 by two German researchers, O. Sickenberg in Paleontology and E. Breitinger in Anthropology, the latter declaring that Petralona man is “the first African out of Africa”.
When Dr Aris Poulianos had the opportunity to study the skull, he immediately highlighted the European traits of the male Petralona man. In 1968, and again from 1975 to 1983, he excavated the Petralona cave, proving that the human skull belonged to a well evident stratigraphic sequence (corresponding to the 11th layer), of 700,000 years old, presenting its own Paleolithic culture, not to mention the oldest traces of fire ever kindled by a human being. The above mentioned professor, O. Sickenberg, with the help of his pupil G. Shutt, indirectly agreed with Dr Aris Poulianos concerning the date of 700,000 years before passing away by the end of 1970.
The initial international reaction was that no humans could exist at that age out of Africa in Europe. Therefore, Dr Aris Poulianos’ theory was seen as exaggerated. However, during the next decades due also to Petralona excavating data, other European Palaeo-anthropological sites were proven to be of an analogous age (700,000 years), such as Mauer (Germany), Isernia (Italy) or Boxgrove (England). The scientific “wind” started slowly to “blow” in favour of Poulianos. Discoveries such as in Atapuerca (Spain), Ceprano (Italy) or Dmanissi (Caucasus) reconfirmed the initial idea that in Europe the existence of humans could be of 2 million years

Jesus H anything to not be connected to Africa, blackness and stay all white as possible as can be eh?
fuqin pathetic, you talk about "triggered" people, but truly this old routine from KKK era America and Nazi Germany whitecentric eugenics, has to be the original act of that which you point out so much in others

Last edited by Zatoichi (2017-08-25 04:03:31)

bud · 2017-08-25 20:22:21

Alvarez-Latino · 2017-09-07 02:13:32

wow this topic is full of humanity love!

bud · 2017-09-07 10:38:07

Its still escalating. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09 … countries/

nämeless · 2017-09-26 16:46:22

Swedish bench.

bud · 2017-09-26 23:01:03

Atleast its still in one piece.

Zatoichi · 2017-09-27 03:54:19

Yeah Sun, be sure to listen to the Chechnyans expert opinion on the state of western genetic sciences

bud · 2017-12-14 10:05:58

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo7tKgmAjO0
-
-
http://www.theweek.co.uk/90114/sweden-p … tacks-soar

Last edited by bud (2017-12-14 10:08:54)

joint · 2017-12-14 16:57:11

why wouldn't just give pistols to these people so they could joggering in most refugee filled areas?

seventy · 2017-12-15 00:23:18

joint wrote:

why wouldn't just give pistols to these people so they could joggering in most refugee filled areas?

Because they would shoot themselves in the foot.

SiMPLE | Forum

Announcement

#211 2017-04-23 00:13:54

Re: Sweden

#212 2017-04-23 00:41:13

Re: Sweden

#213 2017-04-23 01:03:02

Re: Sweden

#214 2017-04-23 17:16:07

Re: Sweden

#215 2017-04-23 18:01:23

Re: Sweden

#216 2017-04-23 19:15:38

Re: Sweden

#217 2017-04-23 23:34:50

Re: Sweden

#218 2017-04-24 00:03:14

Re: Sweden

#219 2017-04-24 10:35:46

Re: Sweden

#220 2017-04-25 06:41:07

Re: Sweden

#221 2017-04-25 23:47:38

Re: Sweden

#222 2017-04-26 02:04:49

Re: Sweden

#223 2017-04-26 14:12:31

Re: Sweden

#224 2017-04-26 22:02:38

Re: Sweden

#225 2017-05-17 15:14:52

Re: Sweden

#226 2017-05-25 22:37:29

Re: Sweden

#227 2017-05-27 06:51:00

Re: Sweden

#228 2017-06-03 03:02:35

Re: Sweden

#229 2017-06-17 01:04:07

Re: Sweden

#230 2017-08-25 04:00:12

Re: Sweden

#231 2017-08-25 04:03:12

Re: Sweden

#232 2017-08-25 20:22:21

Re: Sweden

#233 2017-09-07 02:13:32

Re: Sweden

#234 2017-09-07 10:38:07

Re: Sweden

#235 2017-09-26 16:46:22

Re: Sweden

#236 2017-09-26 23:01:03

Re: Sweden

#237 2017-09-27 03:54:19

Re: Sweden

#238 2017-12-14 10:05:58

Re: Sweden

#239 2017-12-14 16:57:11

Re: Sweden

#240 2017-12-15 00:23:18

Re: Sweden

Board footer