You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
Pages: 1
#1 2020-03-01 17:50:43
- KILLER88
- Player
- Reputation: +543
- Registered: 2018-12-01
- Posts: 1,288
Stalingrad, conquest - tanks
Hello, its been a long time but Im finally up to it.
In my opinion tanks are really something extra at Stalingrad conq. We discussed it like 4 months ago, some admins agreed with me and told me to write on forum.
Why should we have tanks tanks there? Its an infantry map. No reason to have it. Tanks were removed even from Berlin map (inf), so. Thats my point.
What do you guys think?
Last edited by KILLER88 (2020-03-01 17:50:54)
Offline
1 
0
#2 2020-03-01 20:04:03
- Arkos
- Sedmin
- Reputation: +2779
- Registered: 2014-06-06
- Posts: 7,044
-
Re: Stalingrad, conquest - tanks
...
Yes, I agree.
Without planes it would be better. It would be for both sides a nice challenge.
Or let them their planes, but then Axis should have also a Carrier.
...
Last edited by Arkos (2020-03-01 20:07:24)
Offline
0 0
#3 2020-03-01 20:28:18
- AlboBallist
- Player
- Reputation: +374
- Registered: 2019-08-12
- Posts: 687
-
Re: Stalingrad, conquest - tanks
I have two similar fixes:
1. There should be one or two American destroyers in Wake Island, also Japanese fleet should be rearranged.
2. Replace the dive bomber with a torpedo bomber (Aichi val) on Iwo Jima.
Offline
0 0
#5 2020-03-01 21:24:41
- KILLER88
- Player
- Reputation: +543
- Registered: 2018-12-01
- Posts: 1,288
-
Re: Stalingrad, conquest - tanks
Personally, i like the tanks in stalingrad. I need things to zook.
Zooking soldiers doesnt make you happy? 
)
Offline
0 0
#6 2020-03-01 21:53:02
Offline
0 0
#7 2020-03-02 01:47:44
- KILLER88
- Player
- Reputation: +543
- Registered: 2018-12-01
- Posts: 1,288
-
Re: Stalingrad, conquest - tanks
KANER88 wrote:What do you guys think?
Sry for morphing your Stalingrad topic into a "let's fix 'em all" endeavor..
Guilty
Good on you :-) I dont go on forum too often. Most of the time Im lost where should I post something lol
Offline
0 0
Pages: 1