#1 2015-09-04 03:30:51

janet reno (TX)
Player
United States
Reputation: +228
Registered: 2014-05-13
Posts: 680
Windows Vista Internet Explorer 9.0

Who is more dangerous?

R3wU9wg.jpg

             “Aggressively leftist ESPN characteristically threw him off the air, although only temporarily.
Schilling disappointingly apologized for the tweet. However, he later clarified that he was apologizing for the forum he used, not for the contents of the tweet, which he continues to stand by, whether our Islamophile ruling class likes it or not.

But should he stand by it? David Cole finds some problems with the numbers.
According to PolitiFact moonbat Jon Greenberg, 9% of Germans were members of the Nazi party. But how do you define the percentage of Muslims who take their conspicuously violent ideology seriously enough to be “extremists”?
One way might be to do a poll asking whether “suicide bombing/other violence against civilians is justified to defend Islam from its enemies,” as Pew did last year. Percentages answering yes:
Palestinian Territories: 59%

Egypt: 59%
Lebanon: 54%
Jordan: 44%
Bangladesh: 61%
Israeli Muslims: 46%
Tanzania: 45%
Malaysia: 33%

As for Muslims who have infiltrated the West, a 2006–2007 Pew study asked 18- to 29-year-olds, who commit most of the violence, whether they support suicide bombings. Positive results:

U.S.: 26%
Great Britain: 35%
France: 42%
Germany: 22%
Spain: 29%

Given the popularity of ISIS among Muslims in the West, the percentages being somewhat lower is more likely the result of taqiyya than of moderation.

Nazis are distinguished from other oligarchic collectivists like communists and Democrats by the Holocaust. But only a small percentage of those who brought the National Socialist German Workers’ Party to power actually wanted to inflict violence on Jews. In contrast, all Muslims by definition strive to follow the example of Mohammed, whom they consider the perfect human being. It is no secret among them that Mohammed openly called for killing Jews, and personally oversaw the execution of Jews in numbers large enough to easily qualify as genocide (e.g., the Qurayza).”


My question is what is the difference between NAZI and JEHADI?

Last edited by janet reno (TX) (2015-09-04 03:33:24)

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#2 2015-09-04 17:32:06

bud
maestro
Reputation: +1837
Location: shangri la
Registered: 2012-07-07
Posts: 3,946
Website
Windows 7 Firefox 40.0

Re: Who is more dangerous?

about 3% !?

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#3 2015-09-04 19:04:44

seventy
Playor
North Korea
Reputation: +809
Location: Pyongyang
Registered: 2014-03-06
Posts: 1,842
Ubuntu Chromium 44.0

Re: Who is more dangerous?

Except that the main victims of "Jehadis" are Muslims themselves.

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#4 2015-09-04 19:42:46

HoOK
Kebab killer
Palestine
Reputation: +186
Location: Palestine- פלשתינה-فلسطين
Registered: 2012-06-30
Posts: 3,174
Windows 7 Chrome 45.0

Re: Who is more dangerous?

seventy wrote:

Except that the main victims of "Jehadis" are Muslims themselves.

exactly

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

Board footer