SiMPLE | Forum

That's perfect example of admin rights abuse when other admins seems to justify it. There is nothing wrong with the desire to be first. Kicking people just before the end of the round just to piss off the guy is offence worse than excessive abusive language or distruptive gameplay.

First of all you can be sure that rule concerns mostly maps with air units and few exceptions like Aberdeen and Bulge.

Germans have no business being anywhere near canadian main according to the objectives. Putting tank anywhere near canadian main and everyone starts complaining about basecamping. Any attempt to attack saxon inside canadian main and you get storm of fire from everyone infantry/tanks that's also inside main base. You should magicly attack just saxon but not infantry/tanks that's also shooting at you? It takes 4+ hits to take it with panzerschreck if you are extremely lucky, and during that time you are still out in the open vulnerable to attack from the base. Throwing granades requires you to be even closer (if possible at all due to anti-basecamp area damaging you). I can give example of a guy called samuraj long time ago who was exploiting that scheme to make make 100+ killes per map. If anyone wants to use the saxon it's not much of an effort to move it infront of the bridge or anywhere out of the antibaseattack area and do it from there(so it can be legally targeted by another artillery, engineer, anti-tank from behind or granades). Not using waspe is personal interpretation that you just made to get around the problems that this issue is surrounded with. As you can see that's not in the rules you can't punish people for that. Tobruk is even worse, tho I haven't seen anybody to exploit it yet. Waspe positioned at the right place in german's main is not accessable by any means.

Second, make this a rule and it will save you 80 % of all the issues with basecamping on those maps. I'm pretty sure this practice is not allowed on servers like ax, I thoutght this is common sense, but seems like there are people with different oppinion here.

Your self obsession has grown to madness e.S. Knur is only having fun. He's one of the most positive and harmless people around here.

Anyone here had the impression this is admin rights abuse report ?

Everybody should leave their emotions away. Abas you record your gameplay most of the time. If you keep video of this match just post it here and prove the guy wrong. Moon your evidence sucks ass, blaming people like that just damages the credibility of this report procedure. If abas proves you wrong you deserve the perm ban yourself.

  Why would it even matter if it's buddylist or not. I've seen hacks back in the days, people that use them are usually dumb consumers. That buddylisting notion just proves you've been using hacks long enough to develop, or been taught by someone about such concept of "advanced" maphacking. Maphacks should mean perm ban no matter what, except your video doesn't show anything.

Sanctioning that guy was the right thing to do. Attacking friendly vehicles is against the server code. One person with default name gets to decide for everybody esle which situation is hopless and when to end the map. If you even manage to destroy the ship you'll force everybody in your team to sit in front their monitors ("on a sunday in primetime") and wait 3 minutes without even participating, waiting for everybody to die or the ship to respawn. There is nothing wrong with omaha that should be fixed with rules or regulation. The way it's designed is intentional and it aims to recreate the battle historicly accurate. If there is something to fix, it's the apc spawn but it benefits both teams in different stages of the game.Even that way the situation about beach flag is much better than camping on mount suribachi where most of the time you get spawn killed and some people get to score 200+ kills just by spamming ship artillery the entire game (that's what ... 25 % of all japanese tickets and the guy doesn't get to die even once, cuz there is no adequate protection against POW on the map)

If you are not banned this is wrong section. Use the report section if you think it was abuse of administrator rights, but I would guess the reason for your 15 minute ban was teamkilling or playing disruptively. It's aslo possible nameless banned you by accident, but he's not the kind of person that will admit mistake or apologize to anyone, if that's what you expect.

Parties involved:
-uxpers - ordinary player (no known previous charges) banned without warning for committing one teamkill or accidental plane crash (depending the way you interpret the situation).
-e.S - server administrator possibly playing with non-admin account "shots" at the time, victim of one teamkill/accidental plane crash, accused of abusing admin rights.

Reason for this report is offline ban. One side claims it's 1 day , the other 3 or more days ... if the ban has  expired remains unknown.

The topic of the report is not the ban but abuse of administrator rights!

Who has to review this abuse report:
- you and everybody else BUT the parties involved!

A guy named "joint" with cannabis leaf for avatar complaining about a guy called after blind dice gambler smoking weed 5 times a day as being a bad thing and burden of the society ...

As for the ban itself, it seems to me that admin in question is having personal issue with another player, and the  way he resolves it is through brute show of power and nothing else. Using admin tools as you use a bazooka or machine gun  while playing the game is normal thing in here, and people seem to admire such admins as the ratings of e.S post show ...

Another BS function is this suicide penalty that is  the main problem in this guy's case really. I reallize you put that to discourage players from bailing out of planes, but in practice it doesn't prevent anything, it causes ordinary players getting kicked and eventualy banned. Getting trapped in a glitch like on the roof of the bunkers in iwo jima, or the ship where you just spawned got sunk are all example situations where suicide button is essential and you punish people for using it. Sometimes you drive jeep or 2 seat plane with another player aboard, you crash into another friendly vahicle by accident  = direct -9 penalty and kick/ban.

The glitch I was complaining about is going inside the hangar through the wall. Every admin here stated that camping at hangar window is not a glitch, now you ban someone for that. I mean I support you, but first you can help me make it clear camping there should be punishable (as it is at aX btw), right now it's not defined in the rules section and you can't blame people for doing it because of others admins interpretations of this practice. If nameless (and the rest of admins that are in support of the camping) claims publicly it's allowed, he actually creates a rule that does't exist. But if you ban people for it, it is your fault ... all offences that are punishable with ban should be stated in the rules section and this one is clearly not.

Anyways this topic is about a month old. It has nothing to do with camping in hangar. Glitching inside is hard to screenshot, you have to be idle recording the guy that already did it and hope he will do it again. That takes huge ammount of time and preparation that I am not willing to spare, the people that were able to check it and do something about the glitching at the time Ireprted it refused to do so.

You should be ashamed not paying araGORRn. He deserves every penny for working his ass off to exterminate all those fantasy characters on the server. He never takes things personally, but no one should be allowed to ever touch his PRECIOUS AA, ip ban is the least punishment for such horrible crime against humanity...

I'd also would like to apologize for calling you idiot, or anything offensive that I may have said.