#31 Re: Technical Help » bf ports/protocol » 2014-12-03 18:14:23

DICE DA MAN wrote:

Sharing will not affect the increase ping, because I assume that the total connections greater than 10 Mbps, which means playing BF1942, the connection of 5Mbit is sufficient or will happen as I said earlier that if the other computers on a surfing or downloading something from Internet on your computer will happen short of freezing, jumping ping, until it stabilizes connections

thanks for the help DICE!

#32 Re: Technical Help » bf ports/protocol » 2014-12-03 12:31:47

DICE DA MAN wrote:

to be well understood, first of all, how many computers are connected to the router? What works on other computers, surf the Internet or downloading something from the Internet, or play a game online? If you surf the internet, you can try the constraints download / upload on the router or program called netlimiter but in either case it will continue to freeze the moment BF1942 soon as someone opens the page, or start downloading until the limitations that are set to the router / Netlimiter stabilize download . Another thing that I am on your computer many times noticed, I'm not happened due to virus increase lag or ping but because I noticed malware, so I use Malwarebytes. The third thing that happens is (occasionally at each, which is normal) that the problem of the lag / ping about your provider or the provider which is hosted on the server. And the fourth thing is, what you imagined the adjustment ports on the router can try but I still think that you will not have almost no improvement.

two computers connected. Splitting min/max bandwitch between them would increase ping, isn't it?

#33 Re: Technical Help » bf ports/protocol » 2014-12-02 18:06:18

DICE DA MAN wrote:

I think you will not be enough to help reduce the lag / ping ... Anyway, I think you should pay attention to the port on which the server is hosted, because 14567 is the default port
in Linux it is easier to see from which port you are connected to eg 14567 port on which the server is hosted, but your outgoing port is always randomly

so you think that giving higher priority to that port + setting min/max bandwitch for each pc connected to the router won't solve the problem?

#34 Re: Technical Help » bf ports/protocol » 2014-12-02 16:12:29

no Dice, I'm not going to open a server.

I'm setting my router's QoS in order to give priority to packets transmitted by some ports, to avoid lags/freezes when I play online and someone else is using my internet connection

#35 Re: Technical Help » bf ports/protocol » 2014-12-02 15:22:27

DICE DA MAN wrote:

14567, 14690 UDP by default

thank you!

#36 Technical Help » bf ports/protocol » 2014-12-02 12:09:21

Sociopatico
Replies: 10

Hello Peps,

just one question: what is the port used by BF42 when playing online?

Thanks

#37 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Server Rules - Querries » 2014-12-01 12:59:52

I would add something:

- TAXI RULE:

Taxi warning message tells that is forbidden to drive jeeps to planes. But I think that this text misses the sense of the rule: you must not take advantage by driving any vehicle in the direction of the planes. I've seen people taxing with APC on Bocage (allies) and even with tanks on Market Garden (axis).

Of course there are some contradictions: in CTF, for example, I don't see any violation in driving a jeep to a plane in order to bring the flag out from enemy base.

On Wake (conquest) I would also not consider taxi driving a jeep on the airfield to steal a plane when the flag is under the control of enemy.


- UNCAP FLAGS:

On Berlin axis use to spawnkill russians. Is it baseraping? If so, Axis has a great handicap and should have an uncap flag, too.


- AA GUNS

On Battleaxe (and in some RTR/SW maps like Peenemunde, too) planes often destroy AA guns on frag start, even when they are empty, so not active. I would only allow to shoot back, so in my opinion destroying free AA guns in uncap base should be considered  basebombing.

#38 Re: Report Abuse » Which Player is called Minnie? » 2014-11-28 19:12:42

Prince Gabriel (Hun) wrote:

Minnie, kicked without warning my freind .NkC |Chloro (HUN), {Kursk Today, 17:20} ! i dont know,why there may not normal to play in this server!....though Lot of Good admin! i love them,because they are fair and justice! .exmpl. Admin his duty Fairplay!

I know Chloro and I believe he is normally a fair player. But I also think that Chloro himself should open a topic reporting an abuse if he thinks that Minnie did something wrong.

#39 Re: Off-Topic » Funny Videos and Pics... » 2014-11-28 16:53:41

joint wrote:

in order to comply the political correctness, USA passed the law, now blacks have rights to make first move in chess game

wrong topic, nigga!

#41 Re: Feedback » Bots on RtR + SW ? » 2014-11-27 13:09:58

Flettnerman wrote:
Sociopatico wrote:

Flett I don't understand this reaction. Yesterday evening I logged in on RTR and I saw only 7 active users playing Raid on Agheila. Before bots addon rtr server was almost empty. What's the problem in turning bots off when server population reaches a decent number?

Ask tuia about this, not me. I really don't know what a problem to off bots for ALL maps instead of hand-offing in each round.

no Fletty, I think there's a misunderstanding.

I mean that I don't see anything wrong in keeping bots on the server, because "human" population is often too low for a decent play.

In late evening (I mean central europe time) RTR server is almost empty, so bots are needed

Having the possibility to deactivate bots is a great feature, I think you are missing this in some way.

#42 Re: Feedback » Bots on RtR + SW ? » 2014-11-26 11:09:44

Flettnerman wrote:
tuia wrote:

Without bots server would be empty, it was evident some months ago. And you can disable bots with a simple command.

I just getting tired to do this every new round. Ok, let you fun with bots. Maybe you should put some on vanilla server, no?

Flett I don't understand this reaction. Yesterday evening I logged in on RTR and I saw only 7 active users playing Raid on Agheila. Before bots addon rtr server was almost empty. What's the problem in turning bots off when server population reaches a decent number?

#43 Re: Feedback » Suggestion about.. » 2014-11-20 19:49:26

Pb wasn't really effective even when it was updated, but I think it should be mandatory on the server.


Best anti-cheat software I ever experienced, in the past, was "DMW Client" on Mohaa (http://www.dmwworld.com/viewdownloads).  Unfortunately it has never been adapted to Battlefield

#45 Re: Feedback » Bots on RtR + SW ? » 2014-11-18 16:40:06

tuia wrote:

You can't enable bots again, but when another map starts, bots are back. Once you use that command, till end of round there are no bots spawning.

Ok, thanks for the info.

#46 Re: Feedback » Bots on RtR + SW ? » 2014-11-18 12:16:50

tuia wrote:

Thanks! !nobots admin command added.

Tuiapep, how to enable bots again after !nobots?

#48 Re: Report Abuse » Shit Admin » 2014-11-12 13:21:59

You nerds really need a camomile and a little bit of social life.

#49 Re: Off-Topic » football team of my town... » 2014-11-11 15:55:49

George wrote:

Fuxk football. Its a game for retards smile

hey, F1 fan!

#50 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Banned for false accusation » 2014-11-10 19:16:10

Rex wrote:

Yes you are right. I didn't do that glitch on purpose. It was by accident. I was in there for not more than a few seconds. And for the teammate I killed form in there was indeed on purpose. I mourn his death though i admit i enjoyed it a little bit. But i think the banning punishment was very harsh and without taking my testimony.

And I think that is very harsh saying things like "banned for false accusation", considering that you know to be in the wrong.

#51 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Banned for false accusation » 2014-11-10 18:28:53

banned by Mike for glitching, if i'm not wrong.

#52 Re: Report Abuse » Too many idiots! :S » 2014-11-06 18:31:36

And I wish George to be sexually abused

#53 Re: Server Ban Appeals » I was banned last night » 2014-11-04 17:51:28

I'm not sure of that, but if I'm not wrong, you were banned because Serebro though you tked him hitting his plane with flak in Coral Sea. The fact that you say that you were his tailgunner makes me think that there is a misunderstanding: maybe an enemy was hitting Serebro's plane, but the last hit was yours, with plane's mg on the tail.

#55 BF1942 Discussion » question about Forgotten hope 2 » 2014-11-03 18:18:36

Sociopatico
Replies: 3

hello guys,

just a question: do you know if there are active (=populated) BF2 servers dedicated to Forgotten Hope 2?

Thanks

#59 Re: Report Abuse » Bunch of punks » 2014-10-30 18:14:39

wittmann should be permbanned

#60 Re: Report Abuse » Hi Dear Players and Veterans! ;) » 2014-10-29 18:12:42

Hemnes wrote:
nämeless wrote:

you better leave more compliments instead of accusations. smile

nameless, my babe, u have so adorable  eyes that i feel like im in heaven
socio, ur smile is beautiful and ur 5-inch teeth are shining like diamonds, like a diamonds in the sky
george, ur tits are  huge & soft (mmm, liked it)
lecter, u are hot at all
prince, ur haircut is perfect, i wish i would have the same
;-)

I love you too, my dear flower

Board footer