#361 Report Abuse » Setnext » 2014-01-17 00:17:49

Satinca
Replies: 43

Hi,

Someone just set next Berlin without asking. We was on Bocage and the next map was Iwo Jima. Iwo Jima is good and we already played Berlin before...

Satinca

#362 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Word of warning, ---Noob serveR--- » 2014-01-02 19:32:49

Coco wrote:

Anyway we have very bad, racist and homophobic admins here too. Satinca is the worst.

Happy new year for you too !

#363 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Pixel-Fighter Event » 2013-12-29 21:05:48

With the patch it is ok for me. Thank you ziba128 !

Bidji, on essaye ce soir ?

#366 Re: Feedback » Road to Rome and Secret Weapons event day » 2013-12-23 12:08:20

The event was great. Thank you wink

Tuia, do you have statistics of server population when there is no event (just classics maps) a saturday ?

#368 Re: Report Abuse » Plz ban player » 2013-12-20 19:17:03

Laxateur had the flag. I was in a jeep just in front of our flag.
Casca was in an other jeep in the perpendicular road.
Casca suddently stop his car and drive reverse on the way of Laxateur. He had no reason to do this.
Laxateur though it was on purpose (Casca was axis before) or at least idiot (why do this in front of him ?). He was frustrated and he takes vengeance.

One more time it is not a big deal and he doesn't deserve this ban.

After this we still played 2 maps without problem and he was banned. You end our BF time today.

#369 Re: Feedback » Road to Rome and Secret Weapons event day » 2013-11-29 01:01:23

I have played the demo a long time but it was boring. Map rotation and conquest is much better.

#371 Re: Feedback » Road to Rome and Secret Weapons event day » 2013-11-28 21:03:27

The event is good to promote RtR + SW server. And for the players who use to play on RtR + SW it is an occasion to play with many players.

I agree TDM is not fun.

#372 Re: Server Ban Appeals » [Arvernes] Laxateur banned » 2013-11-26 23:04:49

What is normal fashion for you ?
Why plane crashing should be more unfair than plane bombing ?

#373 Re: Server Ban Appeals » [Arvernes] Laxateur banned » 2013-11-25 22:05:11

Flettnerman wrote:

Laxateur is a regular player and he must know the rules.

I agree with you. We have to determine if players who know the rules deserve the same punition as the other or not.

Flettnerman wrote:

I was right in this situation, and you, instead agree with me like admin with admin, start to crying and defending your clanmate. Next time, if it's repeat, I will perm ban you both, first one for sfv, second one for chat spamming.

I find your punition was not fair, but it is only my opinion. I have seen some players agree with you and others not, and why ? Because the punitions depend only of the admins willing.
Now I suggest to determine exactly which fault deserve which punition. Then there would not have such discussions anymore.

Flettnerman wrote:

I can remember one time, when I made 3 tk on accident, said sorry all times, and Laxateur kick me. I said nothing, because he was right in that situation.

Laxateur is not admin.

Flettnerman wrote:

Don't matter who's victim.

I agree with you too. And in my opinion the punition should be the same for players who know the rules as the others.

Flettnerman wrote:

I prefer ban for things on purpose (tk, sfv, moving artillery into battlefield, when second player enter and do it, evading bans ect.), not for accident. Just my opinion.

I agree with you.

But for me for example tk is very frustrating. I die often because of tkers. "Accidental" tk happens often when a teammate is not vigilant (bombing with planes, ships and tanks without checking for teammates in the minimap). For me it is not just "accident" but also irresponsibility and should be punished too (by warn then kick).

Flettnerman wrote:

If u don't know, how to use admin rights, don't learn that other admins, ok? I know what I do, and don't need for advices like this.

I don't want to teach anything to anybody. I just suggest to set the punitions. On our server the rules are clear but not the punitions (it is as admins want).

I suggest to determine the following punitions :
- tk (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- sfv (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- dis (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- lang (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- spam (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- name (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- base (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- twound (for the 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time, ...)
- ...

and we should distinguish this for :
- accident
- on purpose
- and maybe for players who know the rules and others if wanted.

I think it is not a big work and it would help us all to have fair play and less "report abuse" and "server ban appeals".

Tuia what do you think about this ? We could discuss this a few days if you want before set it. Then we could try and see if it is better or not so ?


(And for Georges and Lionel : why do you think we destroy the fun of the game ? I don't understand.)

#374 Re: Server Ban Appeals » [Arvernes] Laxateur banned » 2013-11-25 00:12:11

Remove auto team balance would be a good idea.
Thank you Tuia !

What about instructions for admins to determin which punition in each case ?

#375 Server Ban Appeals » [Arvernes] Laxateur banned » 2013-11-24 21:27:23

Satinca
Replies: 34

Hello !

I'm playing on RtR + SW right now (map Raid on Agheila).

Laxateur was autoteambalanced. So he goes on red team and go for the plane. Flettnerman has the plane first. Laxateur has shot on the plane for rage (teambalance and lost plane).
Flettnerman ban him 7 days.

I agree Laxateur was wrong and deserve a punition. But it was the first time in the game he does that. In normal way admin warn, then kick if it continue and then ban (and not 7 days !). The punition was strong because Flettnerman was the victim. I have seen players shot friendly vehicles many times without receiving any warn ! It is unfair.

I think admins should have a course of actions because punitions are really different between admins and sometimes unfair. (For example respect the order : warn - kick - ban, or kick - ban when it was on purpose i don't know).

However autoteambalance is really bad : is it possible to change it in order to switch players who have already switched in the game (and not those who have played in the same team since the beginning ?).

And please unban Laxateur for this unfair punition. A kick was sufficient.

Thanks !

#376 Re: Feedback » Merging RTR & SW server with 60 slot server » 2013-11-17 18:41:27

You can try for example one changing map of RtR and SW in the list one day of the week ?

#377 Re: Off-Topic » Zwarte Piet » 2013-11-17 18:37:38

I know "withe people" who don't find a job but I don't conclude "white people can't find a work". Try to be a little more specific when you are talking : can you please find statistics before saying such idiotic things ?

#378 Re: Report Abuse » Kick abuse » 2013-11-11 12:18:01

nämeless wrote:
mccrank wrote:

I saw one Arvernes guy use the jeep to get the Mustang too. Why would he lie? It doesn't make sense.

Well, it was another Arvernes guy or what? I still don't understand who really should be kicked for taxi.

It is the problem : you kicked me without knowing or checking anything.

I did not taxi to plane or to any other vehicle. Maybe one of my two other teammates did that, but I don't know.

#379 Report Abuse » Kick abuse » 2013-11-11 00:43:57

Satinca
Replies: 57

Hello,

I was playing on Bocage right now. I was in a M10 in the field. One player says "kick 22 taxi" (I was the 22th and I did not taxi to my M10) and I was direct kicked.
So :
- one player lied
- one admin kick without warning and without checking if it is true or not

So admins, please be vigilant : warn before kick, and do not listen to liers, check yourself.

#380 Re: Server Ban Appeals » unban me » 2013-10-20 11:10:41

Hi,

I was not here and I didn't see anything. But if the admin has not warn him, then kick him before ban him, it is a problem and the ban is not deserved.

#381 Re: Feedback » How stemming the tide of the RTR+SW desertions ? » 2013-10-06 16:57:28

Hi !

Thank you for voting system. Is it possible to decrease the number of needed votes to change ?

For example right now on Gothic Line, we had 11 votes (13 needed to change to Essen). For this 11 players, Gothic Line is boring and some disconnect.

131006045934599871.png

#382 Re: BF1942 Events » Galactic Conquest mod events|*ideas*|*dates* » 2013-10-03 17:31:01

Hi,

If it's possible, you should annonce the events direct on the servers. Most players don't read the forum.

#383 Re: Report Abuse » RtR + SW : maps with main bases attacks » 2013-06-04 23:02:20

Is it possible to have admins rights just on RtR+SW server and just for the maps of the list ?
I see often this problems and the game is very less fun in this cases. I can try to do my best when I play if you want.

#384 Re: Report Abuse » RtR + SW : maps with main bases attacks » 2013-06-04 21:50:36

konstantin75 is baseraping on Santo Croce :

130604095337255708.png

#385 Report Abuse » RtR + SW : maps with main bases attacks » 2013-05-25 08:29:34

Satinca
Replies: 11

Hello,

After the anti basecamping system, the following maps still pose problems :

SW :
Kbely (Axis : planes)
Peenemünde (Axis and Allied : planes, tanks, snipers)
Mimoyecques (Axis : planes)
Essen (Axis : missile)
Gothic Line (Axis : tanks, snipers)
Raid on Agheila (Axis and Allied : planes)

RtR :
Santa Croce (Axis and Allied : planes)
Cassino (Axis, tanks, snipers)
Salerno (Axis and Allied : planes, tanks, snipers)

Axis can always baserape on this maps. Allied sometimes (but never alone ^^)

So, admins are wanted on all this maps on RtR+SW server ! Thank you.

Satinca

#386 Re: Report Abuse » Baseraping : BIRDDOG » 2013-05-24 17:07:06

Alpine [AUT] is baseraping on Gothic Line with a panzer :

130524050922248594.png

#388 Re: Report Abuse » Baseraping : BIRDDOG » 2013-05-20 16:20:41

Hi,

Axis planes baserape in Peenemünde : Franz, Creeping Death and Hustinettenbaer. The following image is Franz :
130520042119338921.png

The anti basecamping is a really good thing, but it's true that planes can baserape without any problem.

#390 Re: Report Abuse » Baseraping : BIRDDOG » 2013-05-02 20:36:02

Good news. Allied team is now baseraping one more time on Peenemunde.

Board footer