SiMPLE | Forum

Ramjet

Member

Reputation: +4

Registered: 2012-09-29

Posts: 146

Website

Re: El Alamein Conquest

But I think that Inf./Tank is more important.

play in a team which doesn't have the best pilots and i guarantee you will have a different opinion

Zody

москит

Reputation: +440

Location: Honolulu

Registered: 2012-03-04

Posts: 1,959

Re: El Alamein Conquest

But I think that Inf./Tank is more important.

play in a team which doesn't have the best pilots and i guarantee you will have a different opinion

I do and i´ve his opinion.

Bender

Member

Reputation: 0

Registered: 2012-10-14

Posts: 75

Re: El Alamein Conquest

if you remove 5 planes from el ala there will be more people who wait for the plane. very bad idea...

never change a running system

Kobra

Member

Reputation: +179

Registered: 2012-12-01

Posts: 868

Re: El Alamein Conquest

Agree with Bender

dary

Player

Reputation: +695

Registered: 2012-05-16

Posts: 3,775

Website

Re: El Alamein Conquest

haha wtf are some of you saying here obviously pilots play the most important role on El Alamein!

With basecamping even a bigger role.

dary

Player

Reputation: +695

Registered: 2012-05-16

Posts: 3,775

Website

Re: El Alamein Conquest

if you remove 5 planes from el ala there will be more people who wait for the plane. very bad idea...

never change a running system

Yes that was the problem. That why we didn't remove too many planes. I think there 12 a while ago and this was really too much.

Ticket_to_Death

Member

Reputation: 0

Location: Belgium

Registered: 2012-12-26

Posts: 388

Re: El Alamein Conquest

if you remove 5 planes from el ala there will be more people who wait for the plane. very bad idea...

never change a running system

And a lot more teamkillers for having a plane!

HoOK

Kebab killer

Reputation: +186

Location: Palestine- פלשתינה-فلسطين

Registered: 2012-06-30

Posts: 3,174

Re: El Alamein Conquest

if you remove 5 planes from el ala there will be more people who wait for the plane. very bad idea...

never change a running system

And a lot more teamkillers for having a plane!

whatever.. i will be there and have fun to.kick them

MightyZo0K

Member

Reputation: +42

Registered: 2012-07-09

Posts: 1,026

Re: El Alamein Conquest

But I think that Inf./Tank is more important.

play in a team which doesn't have the best pilots and i guarantee you will have a different opinion

Man did you forget it already? We played in the same team years ago and we won also wars without having better pilots.

Last edited by MightyZo0K (2013-02-04 18:12:54)

JoJo'

Member

Reputation: +3

Registered: 2012-11-11

Posts: 154

Re: El Alamein Conquest

OFFTOPIC
(skip if you are not interested )

lets make a small tactical lesson

for me, its a true inf map. Why?

The distance between the flags is very long, so it's essential to keep the ticketbleed alive for your enemy.
That means you have to hold and to defend at least 2 of 3 flags! Tanks are more or less useless, since they are very easy to bomb.
So it's all up to the infs to defend your flags.

Of course, it is always better to have air dominance, but once you got ~3 infs at each of your flags, it's very hard to beat you there.
Well treated, planes are the most deadly weapon in Bf42, but they can NOT take flags.
And thats the reason that makes El Ala an infantry map. Good infs win the fights & save the flags, and in this case the tickets.

Last edited by JoJo' (2013-02-04 22:19:36)

Ramjet

Member

Reputation: +4

Registered: 2012-09-29

Posts: 146

Website

Re: El Alamein Conquest

so how do you explain us winning you on Stalingrad this season but getting raped on El Alamein

for me (and most clan players i'm sure) the hierarchy is clear for all plane maps:
1.pilots 2.infantry 3.tankers

Timmos

Player

Reputation: +44

Location: The Netherlands

Registered: 2012-07-11

Posts: 3,067

Re: El Alamein Conquest

pas42 got 10x better infs than TnS, also teamplay is involved