You are not logged in.
Today jews killed 3 guys and 14 injuries in qalndia camp near Ram allah
And before week they killed 1 and 3 injuries in jenin camp (1 km far from me)
Last edited by HoOK (2013-08-26 22:42:55)
Today jews killed 3 guys and 14 injuries in qalndia camp near Ram allah
And before week they killed 1 and 3 injuries in jenin camp (1 km far from me)
any special reason why they were after them?
HoOK wrote:Today jews killed 3 guys and 14 injuries in qalndia camp near Ram allah
And before week they killed 1 and 3 injuries in jenin camp (1 km far from me)any special reason why they were after them?
Jews tried to take a person to jail
And those guys were throwing stones...
Stone vs Gun
Btw; Fu
Last edited by HoOK (2013-08-26 22:54:13)
Jews tried to take a person to jail
And those guys were throwing stones...
Stone vs Gun
Btw; Fu
you should tidy up your streets, too many rocks there
it might save some lives in the long run ;-)
HoOK wrote:Jews tried to take a person to jail
And those guys were throwing stones...
Stone vs Gun
Btw; Fuyou should tidy up your streets, too many rocks there
it might save some lives in the long run ;-)
Lol sure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yibBAbZCjyU
This is today
http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali … eli-forces
Last edited by HoOK (2014-06-13 16:42:03)
Rocks VS weapons
Who will win?
Rocks VS weapons
Who will win?
No one
"Victory is simply the creation of a better political reality. That's victory.
Victory doesn't dictate that we have to conquer Gaza or Ramallah or Nablus or Hebron.
I think my son, who served for three years in the paratroopers, participated in the conquest of Nablus at least two or three times.
Did it bring us victory? I don't think so.
Did it create a better political reality?
The tragedy of Israel's public security debate is that we don't realize that we face a frustrating situation : we win every battle, but we lose the war."
An absolutely brilliant documentary that I recommend to you. The Shin Bet is the Israelish equivalent of the NSA :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1kCZmkglYs
Here the whole film :
http://www.movie4k.to/The-Gatekeepers-w … 19010.html
In what part of West Bank do you live Hook ?
Last edited by Coco (2014-05-21 15:52:58)
Jenin city. 10 mins to borders or less
Last edited by HoOK (2014-05-21 15:25:06)
Shin bet? They control the world !
I have this book about their dirty job....
seems normal to me now.. i mean they murder each other everywhere in Ukraine, Syria, Egypt, (israel/palestine) and so on...
it is unfortunate that people solve their problems with violence
I mean there are other ways.. why murder each other this affects me deeply...
We live in a sick world where you can not express your opinion or say the truth or else something happens to you.
Last edited by HoOK (2014-05-24 16:11:24)
Typical behavior from jews, saying images are fake or it was the Palestinians who shot their own boys, because their soldiers were using rubber coated bullets. You have to be aware who they are, the masters of deceits and lies.
I also heard those Nazi Jews are poisoning our wells and eating our babies.
Wow Tuia. Sieg Heil. Read some more conspiracy theories.
You don't get my point.
What do you think about this? Did they actually kill the boys
I don't know if this is fake, I don't know if the 2 guys were innocent or not. If it is true, and it looks like it, it is a crime and there is no honor in killing the innocent.
or is anti-semite to even consider the israeli soldiers can be guilty of killing palestinian boys?
Nope. It isn't.
But the terminology and chlichees you were using are. The opinion you were displaying is. Dull, medieval-style antisemitism.
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anti-semite
Jews and Judeophiles often attempt to pathologise criticism of and resistance to Jewish supremacism as "anti-semitism". Rather than analysing the most objectionable aspects of Jewish group activity and pin-pointing aspects which arouse the ire of the host population: this is the standard Jewish response to the Jewish Question. The gentile victim fighting back by attempting to criticise a crime or defend himself from the attack against his interests (religious, racial, political, economic, family, national, cultural, personal, etc) is portrayed as an irrational monster, indoctrinated into a systematic body of propaganda to hate the innocent Jews. Any suggestion of Jewish involvement in a crime is portrayed as a "conspiracy theory" or an "anti-semitic canard" invented in the "fraudulent" Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Tuia, that sounds a lot like what goes on here dealing with race right now. Anything you say that can even be remotely linked to race... you're a racist. Ask why blacks do certain crimes... even if it's true.... racist. Don't like our president's politics? Racist. Pro-Reagan? Racist. Republican and/or anti-union? Racist. Apparently we all suffer from "white privilege."
Then the lovely black panthers like to actually be racist but are hailed as heroes by the liberals. There was one guy on tv yelling "We need to kill the pink skinned man and rise up! Kill the white babies!"
Ask why blacks do certain crimes...
It's because they are black.
I don't understand your quarrel over semantics. You just hate Jews, plain and simple.
Now the list in this forum is almost complete, we have Jews, Blacks, Muslims, Gypsies, Russians and I'm sure we can find a few more too. lol I guess everybody needs to hate somebody sometimes.
Sunshine wrote:Ask why blacks do certain crimes...
It's because they are black.
tuia wrote:I don't understand your quarrel over semantics. You just hate Jews, plain and simple.
Now the list in this forum is almost complete, we have Jews, Blacks, Muslims, Gypsies, Russians and I'm sure we can find a few more too. lol I guess everybody needs to hate somebody sometimes.
Oh and I wasn't hating on blacks btw. I was just saying that when asking why do certain crimes happen more in certain places than others, it's automatically viewed as racist by some. Asking why whites to certain crimes more than blacks is fine though i guess. Or when a white person commits a crime against a black person some demand hate crime charges even if it had nothing to do with race. But when a black person attacks a white person specifically because they are white..It's almost never charged as a hate crime.
I hate everyone equally.
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anti-semite
Jews and Judeophiles often attempt to pathologise criticism of and resistance to Jewish supremacism as "anti-semitism". Rather than analysing the most objectionable aspects of Jewish group activity and pin-pointing aspects which arouse the ire of the host population: this is the standard Jewish response to the Jewish Question. The gentile victim fighting back by attempting to criticise a crime or defend himself from the attack against his interests (religious, racial, political, economic, family, national, cultural, personal, etc) is portrayed as an irrational monster, indoctrinated into a systematic body of propaganda to hate the innocent Jews. Any suggestion of Jewish involvement in a crime is portrayed as a "conspiracy theory" or an "anti-semitic canard" invented in the "fraudulent" Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapedia
Metapedia is a multilingual "pro-European" electronic encyclopedia which states that it focuses on culture, art, science, philosophy and politics. It contains white nationalist, white supremacist, Neo-Nazi, and far-right points of view.
Oh and I wasn't hating on blacks btw. I was just saying that when asking why do certain crimes happen more in certain places than others, it's automatically viewed as racist by some. Asking why whites to certain crimes more than blacks is fine though i guess. Or when a white person commits a crime against a black person some demand hate crime charges even if it had nothing to do with race. But when a black person attacks a white person specifically because they are white..It's almost never charged as a hate crime.
We also have negros here. Not as many as in the United States, but I see them everyday and I would say they are not the problem for the society. For example, when I watch local criminal news on TV, I will be very surprised if I will see a black man involved in some crime, because the most part of them cares more about education, job, apartments etc. The real criminal problem here are "gopniki" (singular: "gopnik"), who are low educated Russians without job, so they usually earn their living in cities robbing citizens to get some wallets and mobile phones. In England, they are known as "chavs". Another criminal category are "churki" (singular: "churka"). The polite and tolerant way to call them is "Caucasians". In English, "Caucasian" means "white", but in Russia it does mean an illegal migrant who came somewhere from the region close to the Caucasian mountains, Middle East or Asia. They are Muslim people who look like Afghanistani or Pakistani and behave like Mexicans, usually involved in robberies, drugs trafficking and other bad things. Negros are not dangerous here.
Last edited by nämeless (2014-05-29 20:16:55)