SiMPLE | Forum

If i adjust my fire when no spot was aktive, then i did it with the minimap or by kill reports(less effektive).
I wasn´t in a TS but that would be another legal possibility to adjust Fire without a spot.
When a spot is about to run out i mostly inject on a good target point and keep fireing the point until someone spots again. I don´t even know which clouds can be used as Help for which target areas and you can prove nothing but that you haven´t played enougt with artillery to assess these questions as Admin.
The other reason why you kicked me was that i killed you with artillery, deal with it and don´t abuse your Admin rights.
You also claimed that it is pixeling if i just keep fireing at the point after a spot is over, what a shit is that?
A few days ago at Omaha me and a guy named something like 5kingsYonex sunk allied destroyer with deffguns at the north edge of the map where it was groundet, out of sight from the beach. IMAGINE, we did not use anything illegal.

If 6 ppl wanted to skip and none said no, that is one thing but how many wanted to set Berlin next and how many not?
Often ppl look which map follows before they decide so they expect that map to be next.

"Minefield!" "negativ" "negativ"
BOOM
-3 0 0
BOOM
-6 0 0
...

When i see that the next maps are maps like Midway, Wake, Phillys, often someone wants to skip single maps and an admin does if he finds a few other ppl who want to skip too. Sometimes the admin makes a move to a completely other part of the rotation. I personally like these maps and it´s a bit frustrating if you waited for a map or a couple of maps and then when the time comes they skip it all. If the rotation is not suitable, it should be changed in principle but not so often during runtime.

I don´t see any proofs here and so i would be very carefully with what i say but i propose in general to use punkbuster and a faster activated autoteambalance. Sniperkills can be made at various distances in far shorter times, so short that you may see one day the information of 3 sniper kills from the same guy at once(because the third happens before the first Information disappears from the screen and however noone else made a kill between).
Players who never used snipers exzessively may be not able to imagine how the movement get automised.

AW52 can be killed by aa or Flakpanzer IV, it´s just difficult if there is a good pilot in AW52.

That map looks good, exspecially for Snipers. Just one thing, the British did fight in Norway, not the USA.

It happened that when i was using carrier in fight we had no island flag, and? Didn´t we have any other spawnpoints? Can you know? Guess who took the seaflag with which ship. Was the allied carrier a bad spawnpoint that time? Do you know as Axie? Many planes started from it during it was underway and in action. If it sunk, a very short time later it respawns and airsupport could go on with next to no interruption. Axis carrier had more interruption, more casualties and took no flag. You wrote that no planes could take off, you meant axis carrier but you wrote it as if it was allied one. The tactic is disruptive for the enemy, you wrote it yourself.
seriously, if you would be honest, you wouldn´t use axis casualties as arguments against allied tactics.

Hello,
as long as this question is not clear, i stopped using that tactic.
Normally it is very bad to bring that ship close to the enemy cause it respawns late and its Planes are important, like in reallity. USA were able to fight the japanese cause they did not loose their 3 carriers at Pearl Harbor.
The original spawntime was much longer but now it´s less then a half minute, so the airsupport and respawnpoint are not in Danger.
Leaving the carrier at the spawn gives the enemy the chance to kill the spawning and starting Pilots and continiously sink the ship with naval guns. i did that too, very effective. If that happens it sinks far more often then in movement, hiding the carrier somewhere is a solution but doing that is relativly boring and if it sinks the survivers will drown cause the new carrier spawns elsewhere. Ramming is one of the oldest tactics in naval warfare to sink enemy ships, it is allready used in BF1942 by the captains of destroyers and battleships to turn the enemy hull to get the guns out of action. This works too with a carrier and the big hull can overrun the hull of a destroyer, under water the destroyer takes more damage and sinks. During the last days i sunk at least two destroyers and two submarines with Enterprise, the subs get destroyed immediately. If it is done right, the carrier survives ramming a destroyer too despite its gunfire. The submarines respawn very fast too so it does not make sense to hunt them with carrier but when it comes to the situation that you see one in front of you, ramming it is the best thing you can do instead of getting sunk by endless torpedos. Ramming battleship or enemy carrier is not that effective but sometimes that ships can be rammed out of the map to cause some losses, battleship can be severely damaged to increase the chances of own battleship. Duing the ramming its guns can only be used to one side, so the carrier + own destroyer can sink enemy battleship. To bring the carrier into battle also allows to shot down a good number of enemy Planes. Its aa is better then the aa of the battleships, exspecially of the Yamato. Additionally the carrier can take flags, one round i got most points on allied team only using enterprise.

So i propose: Allow this tactic because it is not disruptive or increase spawntime of the carrier significant to make that tactic disruptive. I guess the spawntime is that low because many ppl. are bored in that map if they don´t get a plane or other vehicle.