You are not logged in.
Thanks BB. Pop the champagne and dance the weekend away!
https://youtu.be/RkEXGgdqMz8
Oh my, I feel your pain guys! On top of this important discovery I have to drop a bomb! Not to put you down but this isn´t the only problem we face. But let us try to solve one at a time,ok?
Here goes:
Following Earth's last ice age, which peaked 20,000 years ago, the Antarctic warmed between two and three times the average temperature increase worldwide, according to a new study by a team of American geophysicists.
The disparity -- Antarctica warmed about 11 degrees Celsius, nearly 20 degrees Fahrenheit, between about 20,000 and 10,000 years ago, while the average temperature worldwide rose only about 4 degrees Celsius, or 7 degrees Fahrenheit -- highlights the fact that the poles, both the Arctic in the north and the Antarctic in the south, amplify the effects of a changing climate, whether it gets warmer or cooler.
The calculations are in line with estimates from most climate models, proving that these models do a good job of estimating past climatic conditions and, very likely, future conditions in an era of climate change and global warming.
"The result is not a surprise, but if you look at the global climate models that have been used to analyze what the planet looked like 20,000 years ago -- the same models used to predict global warming in the future -- they are doing, on average, a very good job reproducing how cold it was in Antarctica," said first author Kurt Cuffey, a glaciologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and professor of geography and of earth and planetary sciences. "That is noteworthy and a confirmation that we know how the system works."
These models currently predict that as a result of today's global climate change, Antarctica will warm twice as much as the rest of the planet, though it won't reach its peak for a couple of hundred years. While the most likely climate change scenario, given business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions, is a global average increase of 3 degrees Celsius (5 degrees Fahrenheit) by 2100, the Antarctic is predicted to warm eventually by around 6 degrees Celsius (10 degrees Fahrenheit).
The new results, which are the first good calculation of Antarctica's ice age temperature and the amount of warming since, do rule out a couple of climate models that do not include enough feedback to accurately reproduce the amplified temperature in the polar regions, Cuffey said.
Cuffey and his colleagues, including Gary Clow of the U.S. Geological Survey in Lakewood, Colorado, published their results online last week in the early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Deglaciation in Antarctica
The analysis is based on the fact that as the world warmed following the coldest part of the last ice age 20,000 years ago, the ice deep inside the Antarctic glaciers warmed more slowly than Earth's surface, just as a frozen turkey put into a hot oven will still be cold inside even after the surface has reached oven temperature. By measuring the remaining difference -- the 20,000-year old ice deep in the West Antarctic ice sheet is about 1 degree Celsius cooler than the surface -- the scientists were able to estimate the original temperature based on how fast pure ice warms up.
Clow measured twice, once in 2011 and again in 2014, the temperature in a 3.4-kilometer-deep (2-mile-deep) borehole from which the West Antarctic Sheet Divide ice core had been drilled during an eight-year project that ended in 2011. Ice at the bottom of the borehole was deposited about 70,000 years ago; ice about one-sixth of the way up about 50,000 years ago; and ice about one-third of the way to the surface 20,000 years ago.
Cuffey developed a technique to combine these temperature measurements, which are smoothed as a result of heat diffusion in the ice, with isotopic measurements of old ice to come up with an estimated temperature of 11.3 degrees, plus or minus 1.8 degrees Celsius, warming since the depths of the ice age.
Interestingly, the Antarctic temperature increased much more rapidly than did Arctic temperatures after the glacial maximum. By 15,000 years ago, Antarctica had warmed to about 75 percent of its temperature today. The Arctic took another 3,000-4,000 years to warm this much, primarily because of the fact that the Northern Hemisphere had huge ice sheets to buffer warming, and the fact that changes in ocean currents and Earth's orbital configuration accelerated warming in the south.
Antarctica was also more sensitive to global carbon dioxide levels, Cuffey said, which increased as the global temperature increased because of changing ocean currents that caused upwelling of carbon-dioxide-rich waters from the depths of the ocean.
The situation today, with global warming driven primarily by human emissions of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, is different from natural cycles, he said. The ability of the oceans to take up carbon dioxide cannot keep up with the rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which means carbon dioxide and global temperatures will continue to increase unless humans cut their carbon dioxide emissions.
PolarModePete
0:20-1:04 is the best part,but the song is also good.
...and Chelsea beat Man.City.. I rest my case.
Lol. You guys still tread this thread?
The election is over and done with.
In the end of the day it all comes down to the American people
how they choose to run their homeland and it is my firm belief
they will do great, with or without Trump or Clinton.
All Americans I know are hardworking, honest, loyal,
generous people with great sense of humor and with a lot of warmth and compassion.
That won´t change no matter who is president.
America is a great nation because of their people. And you could take that to the bank.
NoPanicModePete
Good point Grove.
ABAS my friend..why? btw I think Man City will beat Chelsea on Saturday...=)
I mean a bf soldier nick is pretty much same thing as having .. or " as nick. Reason for that isn´t "oh I´m to lazy to choose a proper nick"
It´s because they want to hide behind a nick that in the heat of the battle is less obvious and when someone try to report, the question will be:
"which bf soldier was it?" Bf Soldier 1, 3 , 19,42,7 or 8? Taxi, team wound and messing up the game doesn´t give you minus score, so they get away with it..
It would be intresting to hear the opinion on this from you Tuia, Nameless, E.S, Pit, admins on the RtR and other more permanent admins that play the game often.
I might be totally wrong on this post and yes a bit heated when I wrote it (after a massive TK, Teamwound, bullshitting driving cars into planes and friendly fire frenzie hour on the FRA server) but I think the question is still valid.
PS: we all know the poll is probably rigged!
PanicModeTeamwound
Hey Finn, you on the troll path again ey?
Why don´t you ever learn?
https://youtu.be/K9p9Yr1U2KA
These BFSoldiers are rapists and criminals. We need to build a wall to keep these crooks out of our servers. And we should have the bfsoldiers pay for it.
"build that wall build that wall build that wall"
Yes let´s continue with the same old same old, teamkill/wound/plane whoring revenge AA/car crash/mines and baserape frenzie.
Thanks!...Tankhs..? ![]()
Attention all.
I´ve just played Simple FRA server and have noticed the x-treme amount of TK, disruptive gameplay and Teamwound, beaching carrier and AA friendly fire as soon there is no admin online! All done by these "Bf-Soldier" people who hide behind this bf-soldier nick! So my suggestion to ALL you admins and server hosts:
PLEASE BAN the name bf soldier in the game= If your nick is bf-solder in any way=auto kick=x3=BAN.
This way we can finally get rid of these stupid coward morons destroying the game once and for all!
PMP
Fascinating but highly illogical.
In this case I would suggest to have a full spectrographic analysis done.
An undectected fluxuation in the dampening fields could drain several areas of power, interfere with communications, block sensor readings including transporter locks, and prevent the operation of phasers and other large power systems.
If the dilithium crystals and the primary component in the warp drive engine is compromised it would cause the warp core to get unstable.
I also would suggest a full analysis of the gravimetric field around the warp bubble to exclude any faults in the primary systems.
PanicModePete
Happy Thanksgiving! ![]()
Oh how I like "please proceed to piss off"! ![]()
I wish I also had a voice like this. But super high score on BF42 have to do.
You gotta hand it to these guys, they really did put a lot of effort in to this one. A real oldie from the back in 2002..
Me, I can´t even log in on most RtR maps...for me it is always uncapturable..
Felt the urge to post some good old classics..
PanicModePete wrote:As I understand it this is a report about the rumour that there were people drunk at work in a coal mine. As I do not understand russian
I don´t understand what the reporter asks but maybe some of our russian friends could interpret?
Panic.That guy is handicapped.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjLNKUEcwks
What an amazing story! And what great people. You learn something every day! Thanks for posting this Ziba.
As I understand it this is a report about the rumour that there were people drunk at work in a coal mine. As I do not understand russian
I don´t understand what the reporter asks but maybe some of our russian friends could interpret?
Panic.
Zatoichi Its my honour to take your brain test. so pls CooP with me..
http://i64.tinypic.com/10o1wsz.jpgYou Failed XD
You don´t want to go down that road again, Finn? Do you? Really?
Panic.
Hiya
Seems like I have everything downloaded, still some maps do not open. Husky for example..
Hmmm..?
PanicModeHmmm
Hello my skilled IT ppl... ![]()
Well here we go again. It seems like many of the maps on the RtR+SW cant be found when there is a new map loading.
For example I get in, map opens, I play, good ping, on a solid 2 pointer and sometimes even 4, time for a new map and than BOOOM..."map not found"
I can play some of the maps but mostly I can´t get the game to load. Do I have to reinstall everything again..omg..
The Simple FRA is ok, Social rejects fine with its 200+ ping and even AX and OZ Wake...but not RtR..
Why? Whyyyy?
PmP
Had to check this Ramjet up...and wtf..I can see some familiar faces. ![]()
Here are some skilled pilots from the past. I really like the one at 2:03.