You are not logged in.
No but how you know he is using the clouds?
He could use a spot or especially in that map other legal methods beside blind fire.
There are several ways to silence this weapon in base.
Arkos wrote:...
Going into an enemy base is not allowed, Dude. This includes stealing any vehicles.
Except at CTF Maps.
Now you know it.
...
i just read the rules. there is nothing about stealing opponents vehicles.
Stealing vehicles from an enemy uncap base is a form of base attack.
If a tk looks like an an accident, was not your own fault but you don't get an apology, you can enter ptk in console to react on that without using admin rights. If it looked like purpose, i kick for tk, an apology may prevent that only in doubtful cases.
If you get one for an uninteded tk, you may enter ftk in console.
Well if you waste the vehicles/(heavy) weapons of your own team on purpose (if we think you know it better), you deny real players the fun of using it to fight FOR and TOGETHER WITH their team.
Sabotaging the own team is not the kind of fun we offer here, so it falls under the rule disruptive "gameplay".
Have fun kicking the asses of the other team!
Edit: The scale is the rules and not what other idiots do.
I would never expect an admin killing teammates on purpose.
Who said it was on purpose?
to arkos / nameless :
here is the proof that i broke no rules in that round
i stayed in the same team entire round. that can never be teamstacking or disruption
do you understand ? i never switched team once ... were you guys drunk or high on drugs during that round ? this is probably one of the most absurd ban ive ever gotten
once in a while in simple servers, half the players in a team get disconnected, due to some software code implemented by tuia, in order to prevent server crashes. that is what happened in the middle of this wake round. half the axis team got disconnected. i and others noticed it immediately and knew that it was the usual server-half-team-auto-disconnect, but of course, arkos didnt notice it. some time later he sees that half his axis team is missing, and then assumes THAT IT OF COURSE MUST BE EVIL BFSOLDIERS FAULT !! he probably thinks that my killings made half the axis team log off, so now i must be punished ! which together with my three kills of him pisses him of even more
furthermore, some wuss axis players logged off right before i got banned because they couldnt handle allied domination. this is another thing that arkos got pissed off about. bro, listen... i am not required to switch to the weak team to help them. let me repeat : staying in the same team entire round, no matter how many enemy team players log off, can NEVER be teamstacking or disruption
and what about admin frank(ger) he stayed in allied too that entire wake round. given your crippled logic, he should be given a 3 day ban too (actually all allied players should have a 3 day ban) .... hmmm ... sure arkos and nameless ... thumbs up ... super intelligence ... super thinking
my ban should be removed immediately, and you should give me an apology
im sick and tired of the corrupt and semi-corrupt simple admins who think they know everything about the game, and see themselves as experts, even though they are total noobs and misunderstand most stuff
what this all comes down to, is that theyre pissed off about a non-clanner being better than most clanners. arkos got owned (as usual) in that round, including 3 kills by me, and thats why he wanted me banned
and no, this is not disrespect by me, just for the sake of disrespect. this is a description of your bad admin behaviour and abuse
admit it, nameless and arkos, i and merlin did not teamstack, this was (again for 50+ times since 2017), an incorrect ban, influenced by your hatred and negative feelings against me
nameless hates me a lot, because i kill him so much and steal all his gold medals, so he uses any excuse to ban me and get me out of the server
just in recent 14 days, nameless has banned me 5 days. 2x1 days for bailing from plane (wasnt even deathbails), and now three days for teamstacking which i didnt do. how often do you give three day bans for teamstacking nameless ? never. unless its me, bfsoldier, then you give a ban as long as possible. nameless is corrupt and he abuses. its a fact proven again and again
00:00 i enter the server as first player in allies thats not teamstacking by me
00:17 the round starts axis 21 players allies 18 players
01:27 i kill arkos for the second time
01:59 axis 20 players allies 19 players
04:29 axis 20 players allies 20 players
07:14 axis 24 players allies 23 players
08:29 axis 22 players allies 23 players
08:31 – 08:35 half the axis team gets auto-disconnected by server software
08:38 i kill arkos for the third time
08:51 axis 14 players allies 22 players
09:00 arkos says : nice teams
09:08 arkos says : just great
10:27 arkos says : wow that is boring
10:59 arkos says : runnext?
11:15 axis 18 players allies 21 players
11:49 arkos says : allways the same pussies
12:05 arkos says : (to me and merlin) i will smash their b17 by kamikaze due the next 2 days
12:30 axis 15 players allies 21 players
12:31 arkos says : shäme (nameless) ... kick some of their stacking asses
12:38 arkos says : bfsoldier and merlin as example
12:58 nameless bans me for three days for teamstacking even though i did not teamstacknameless also kicked maj.merlin for teamstacking seconds after
CONCLUSION :arkos told nameless to kick me and merlin for teamstacking even though we did not teamstack. that is corrupt behaviour and admin abuse
nameless kicked merlin for teamstacking, even though he did not teamstack
nameless banned me for 3 days for teamstacking, even though i did not teamstackarkos is mostly a good and friendly and helpful admin, but sometimes makes big admin mistakes ingame. this one seems like deliberate abuse because he was real angry
nameless is a semi-corrupt admin that deliberately abuses his admin privileges against players whom he hates
Yes i was allied from the beginning and didn't switch to axis before first spawn even though it's usually harder to fight for allies at wake und axis win (i like the challenge).
However i didn't get autoswitched to axis so i could not even have teamstacked under such a circumstance, probably you also not or they woult refer to it. Rarely enough, allies won the map but not too easy.
Btw.: You are stealing an annonymus noob-name all the time, if that name belongs to someone, then to the guys who really don't know better.
So pls don't complain about someone who uses 000 before you do yourself, use it from the beginning and show that you are better (maybe less lame?).
No other admin then Hilly knows what really happened (whatever it was).
Not that i wouldn't like to ban xpfanatic myself with his egoistic gamestyle if i ever catch him but...
It would not be the first time one or more "admins" try to ban someone for something they think happened or wanna think happened or just say happened.
If it were up to Hillybilly, xpfanatic would remain banished without proof.
So i think it't good that we have critical voices here to keep up standards (not only MadMax and Sparrow), who sticks good with the other admins/some "admins" is more a question of perspective.
It was the vanilla server and the alex was kicked for tk within the same map.
Edit: (Battleaxe)
Dickschiff ~ Battleship
You are less visible with very short names, some admins may close an eye if you have at least 2 visible characters or a big one but you can't rely on that.
I wasn't there but if you just ask for an admin without writing why, some admins may think you just want find out whether an admin is on or not to prevent getting caught doing something forbidden yourself.
Edit: + it costs the admin extra time just to respond but he didn't get informations so far and he got to expose himself so the troll can prevent getting caught by behaving nice while he knows he has an admins attention.
If a tk looks like an an accident, was not your own fault but you don't get an apology, you can enter ptk in console to react on that without using admin rights. If it looked like purpose, i kick for tk, an apology may prevent that only in doubtful cases.
If you get one for an uninteded tk, you may enter ftk in console.
If someone makes his first turn towards the battlefield or opens up, he is legit target. If someone turned away to climb behind his own base, leave.
Don't wait over enemy base for planes to follow them until the takeoff can be considered over (stoped climbing).
If you happen to fly over enenmy base and see a plane taking off, turn away and don't stay behind it.
Yes i am some kind of hobby admin like all others, thats one thing we really have in common, none of us is paid here (or should i just have ask for money?).
Map Guadalcanal, time: Don't remember, ask Khazarrec
As allied in a priest i came from base.
I had passed the first flag that just been recaptured and moved forward towards the next axis positions.
Then i got hit by a first shot from left side/rear, i thougth it was an enemy and i tried to drive away and leave him for my team.
Then i got a second hit of that kind that destroyed me, it was a tk and i realised both shots came from the same.
You said somthing like sorry but i didn't believe you so i ask you why you tk me.
I hoped to see an answer that makes it halfway plausible since there is allways the suspicion of abuse when it affects the gameplay of the admin himself. However i didn't see an answer, so i kicked for tk.
You came back and said somethink like piieep only 3 tk are a kick piieep as if i was the operator.
Then you said a lot of bad language, many other admins would have banned you (a longer time) for. Kick for language, i don' remember a kick for dis.
You came back and the bad language didn't get better, so i ask something like: do you want to get banned?
Your ongoing bad language was your answer and i gave you a 15 mins ban, smallest ban you can get to calm down.
If there is any doubt about my words, could someone pls post the chatlog of the minutes around the first kick? (when we know the time).
Consider that it looked very intentional and deliberate teamkillers like to fake apologize.
I was very forbearing with you, more would be stupid.
I was just playing Tobruk and got that message, when i tried to reconnect, it said again: Rauswurf vom Server.
Wtf?
Edit: Why that? Btw. no minusscore etc.
I've noticed that some admins consider the limit of the death bubble to be crucial, which is invisible and goes well beyond the range of the vehicle and player spawning points. Others, on the other hand, use the edges of the grid squares as the boundaries of both main bases, which, for example, does not fit in Kursk and unequally treats the teams. The purpose of the baseattack rule is to avoid spawnkilling of vehicles and players in their main base as well as to allow the aircraft to ascend. If you like frontal attacks, it's ok to be attacked right after leaving the main base. Anyway, if the affected one has opened the fire before, it does not matter where he is and where the boundary of the main base is just according to the admin in question.
And btw. it's not possible to damage fresh spawned (empty) tanks were no tanks spawn.
Wie Arkos schon sagte: Im CTF Modus dürfen die Hauptbasen angegriffen werden, außerdem in der Objective Karte Battle of Britain.
In der Karte Aberdeen fehlen auf der Minikarte die Symbole für die uneinnehmbaren Basen, es sind aber welche und diese dürfen entsprechend nicht angegriffen werden.
If you see someone with the name Hitler, you can start spectating him, the probability that he violates the rules is even higher than in a BFSoldier_XX.
Beeing allowed to use the names of dictators is one thing, using it in some cases gives you a hint where to look at.
Oh yes and the changed words will be marked as hyperlinks and if you hold the mouse over it, the real words will be shown in a small windowXD
I think the reason is: Your computer and you think that you can fire a shot because the information that you are allready dead has not yet arrived.
This will be corrected retrospectively and your shot will be revoked.
@Hillbillyninja:
That was a clear statement from you and that is what i wanted to hear since arijevac keeps telling another story which might have explained his language in a way, so i know you can stand 100% behind your decision.
I asked for remote Access for several reasons and still got no answer, does that include access to the logs too or is that another thing?
Edit: Oh alvarez doesn't like my questions.
So Hillbillyninja you saw with your own eyes that arijevac intentionally teamkilled Alvarez-Latino 4 times or did you saw the grey message and Alvarez-Latino's complaint? A while ago both were accusing each other of teamkilling/teamattacking, i don't know who started but i believed none of them.
@Paul:
I do not blame the SW and RTR admins for this decision, I criticize that the rules are applied differently on the servers and in particular that now apparently also happens on a single server.
The first I see as a possible cause for the second. By the way if i would give a shit, i wouldn´t spend time to criticize anything.
Assumed the invisible beginning of a death bubble would be suitable to be defined as base border, many years there were no deathbubbles on the vanilla server and since they are there, you notice them only if you are on foot.
I don´t know if SW and RTR had death bubbles earlier but it might explain some developments.
In case it is as arijevac showed it on the map: No baseattack imo.
If the admin says the mark on the map is not correct, he should present where he thinks the Bombrun happened.
In doubt, maybe the logs say somethink about it.
However if the tank was allready shooting at him before, that doesn´t even matter if arijevac didn´t destroy inactive in base as well.
This makes me think the bocage story has become a bad example of how admins consider a base to be way larger than it actually is.
I noticed that the admins on the SW server, maybe also on RTR server, interpret the rules differently than on the server of the basic version, in this case it would be spongier.
That is not good and it becomes worse if we have such different interpretations on a single server.
if we do not tie the borders of the bases to the sandbags or fences, we have to provide detailed information for each map, where else the borders are.
Otherwise admins and their friends can abuse it by interpreting the area of the base each time in their favour and some will.
Anyway it would be much harder to judge in practice if the boundaries are not physically recognizable, especially if you want to do it fair.
It's a bit laborious to view the screenshots but all are from the map El Alamein in ctf mode.
The Anti Baseattack rule is not applied in CTF mode.
If you look at the flag symbol on minimap you see no uncaptureable-symbol on it, this means this flag can be captured or stolen, however attacked.
In this case you can steal the flag and bring it to your own.
One exception concerning flag symbols:
In Aberdeen you also won´t see that uncaptureable-symbol on the mainbase flag but it is uncaptureable and must not be attacked.
These flags were once captureable but the map got modded and however they didn´t manage to get the uncaptureable-symbol on the minimap.
So you know why you were kicked, nice title by the way. If a few other did it too, that doesn´t make it better.
The more do it the more others get autoswitched, you were caught.
A warning would have been better for you (if you don´t learn anyway), but not for the server.
Edit: You have played here long enough to know the rules.
Na you teamstacked at the very end of the previous map, so i kicked you as soon as possible.
If it is as Arcos said, don´t unban him until 2020.
We will not be able to change his behavior or protect the server from him if we are as inconsistent as before.
Dein Browser erkennt zurzeit keines der verfügbaren Videoformate.
Klicke hier, um unsere häufig gestellten Fragen zu HTML5-Videos aufzurufen.