#3181 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Banned for TK'ing, very sorry about what I did » 2012-09-14 10:01:07

Ok, BlackHawk. You are unbanned, but don't do it again.

#3182 Re: News and Announcements » SiMPLE | BF1942 [USA] new IP address » 2012-09-14 10:00:20

Thank you, Browzar. I'll have a look at it.

#3183 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-12 23:25:03

For me Madkiller has nothing to do with RusBF.ru, he is an admin there, but that's it. He wants to turn the server into a no rules server, where anything is allowed, so he and his boyfriends can fool around.
I know RusBF.ru server owner, he is an intelligent person and has helped me before. He doesn't have time to manage the server.

When EA dropped BF1942 PunkBuster support, it was a clear message they didn't care anymore about it.

#3184 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-12 17:50:14

Another thing is, Madkiller wrote in the server GameTracker blog, but got erased, something like, your server is going down in the ranking, a few days before this happened. Didn't pay any attention to it and deleted the blog post. I hardly believe Madkiller can convince anyone in his dreadful english to remove the server from GameTracker ranking. Maybe he knew something about it.

#3185 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-12 16:44:26

Funny thing is, that SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] got removed from another server ranking website: Game-Monitor. All other SiMPLE servers are tracked except the main one. Conspiracy? smile
I would love to see SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [USA] server reaching top of the server ranking lists. That was about to happen, if it wasn't for all the IP addresses changes.

#3186 Re: Server Ban Appeals » ip blocked » 2012-09-12 00:02:40

There are other good BF1942 servers where you can play: Netorn, BF1942.ru, RusBF.ru, MoonGamers, The Apostles of Midway, [5th MR] Midway, =|HERO|=, etc.

#3187 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-11 23:44:09

By the way, TheCLQ.COM is a better website. It has more detailed statistics.

#3188 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-11 23:27:07

No need to close your GameTracker account, Denny. They locked the topic, and deleted my new topic, with a reply to it. Didn't expect that from them. :

Just for the record:

tuia2012 wrote:

Please unlock the topic. We should have the right to reply. Don't make it a one way discussion.

burn wrote:

wrote:
Unfortunately the availability of the files does not change it. Users can find a cracked server copy online but that does not make it right.


This is not a crack. You said this server code modification gives an unfair advantange. It's not unfair because any server owner can use it. If you were not to rank cracked servers, I would agree, because that's illegal. If you were not to rank any server which had modified its code, for whatever reason, because it's illegal to change original server code, you had to derank almost all BF1942 servers. You decided not to rank the servers with more than 64 players slots because as you've said it, it's illegal and gives an unfair advantage, but still you rank cracked servers and servers with not original server code. I can't understand your decision, based on that.

#3189 Re: Server Ban Appeals » banned in SiMPLE [FRA] » 2012-09-11 23:21:04

1 day ban, Rick Dangerous, sorry.
Rick Dangerous 2 one of my favorite games. smile

#3190 Re: Server Ban Appeals » ip blocked » 2012-09-11 23:17:02

You use cheats, you use proxies to evade bans, you threatened to crash the server, why on earth should you be unbanned?
Thankfully, there are other good BF1942 servers where you can play.

#3191 Re: Server Ban Appeals » request to unban =( » 2012-09-11 20:27:00

Hi Danilo,

You were banned for teamkilling and avoiding your bans. You are unbanned, but if you get banned for anything stupid, your ban won't be probably reconsidered.

#3192 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-11 20:15:27

It's an unfair decision, that's why I'm discussing with GameTracker admin. Players can still connect from GameTracker client.
You should use Adblock Plus for Firefox or another adblocker program, so GameTracker doesn't get revenues from advertisement views on their webpage. tongue

#3194 Re: Feedback » Do you like those statistics? » 2012-09-11 17:31:04

I've tried installing select(bf) on a Linux test server, but couldn't get it to work.
All game statistics are being stored since August.

#3195 Re: Technical Help » Damned Gamespy » 2012-09-11 17:27:33

I've made a patch to avoid locking the game at the menu for some minutes if the master.gamespy.com server is not accepting connections. They should have fixed this long time ago, it's a stupid coding mistake. As can be seen, if GameSpy is down or not accepting queries the number of BF1942 players drops drastically.

#3196 Re: Technical Help » Damned Gamespy » 2012-09-11 11:44:26

GameSpy master server is not responding to queries once again. Maybe this was EA's birthday present to the BF1942 community. When you click the MULTIPLAY > INTERNET button, BF1942 client tries to connect to master.gamespy.com to retrieve the servers list. It waits till it times out, around 6 seconds, but the worst thing is it tries to connect every time to master.gamespy.com for every server listed in your ServerList.dat file. So, it's around 200 x 6 seconds until it's unlocked. I've looked at the BF1942 code and this can be patched.

#3197 Re: BF1942 Discussion » HAPPY BIRTHDAY BATTLEFIELD 1942 » 2012-09-11 09:53:12

They already released it, Battlefield 1943, but for consoles only. I don't expect any time soon to see a Battlefield WWII game. It'll be either set in the future against the scaring alien forces or another modern warfare, a remake of Call of Duty series.

#3198 Re: BF1942 Discussion » SiMPLE | BF1942 No key [FRA] removed from Gametracker ranking !?! » 2012-09-11 09:48:20

Can someone explain to GameTracker that we don't use idle clients or ever reported fake players? If they don't believe it, come and see it for themselves.
Probably someone reported our server, and GameTracker are too lazy to check anything, when they saw more than 64 players in the server, brilliantly concluded that must be a fake server. Battlefield 1942 server can have up to 256 players.

#3199 Re: BF1942 Discussion » HAPPY BIRTHDAY BATTLEFIELD 1942 » 2012-09-11 00:31:10

I was wondering if EA had a birthday present for the BF1942 community. Guess not.

#3200 Re: Server Ban Appeals » ip blocked » 2012-09-11 00:26:55

How many times you were banned and kicked using fake nicknames?
It's pretty obvious in the chat logs you don't care about playing.

#3201 Re: Report Abuse » farsan » 2012-09-10 23:47:43

Thanks for your report. He will be banned.

#3202 Re: Server Ban Appeals » ip blocked » 2012-09-10 23:45:56

brigg, it's funny you come asking to unblock your proxies addresses. Buy some new ones.

#3203 Re: News and Announcements » Unstable ping on SiMPLE [FRA] server » 2012-09-07 20:07:49

Test your ping to the server. Windows key + R, type cmd, type in the black box ping -n 30 188.165.220.115

#3204 Re: Report Abuse » Sorry - I dont want ban » 2012-09-07 19:37:51

Hmm... you have to wait for the current round to finish. 5 minutes.

#3207 Re: News and Announcements » Unstable ping on SiMPLE [FRA] server » 2012-09-07 19:24:21

Ping is stable

> ping -n 18 188.165.220.115

Pinging 188.165.220.115 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
Reply from 188.165.220.115: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 188.165.220.115:
    Packets: Sent = 18, Received = 18, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 69ms, Average = 51ms

#3209 Re: Server Ban Appeals » Banned for what? » 2012-09-07 09:54:32

Hi WildJJ,

You were banned mistakenly, sorry. An english troll was having his fun this night, teamkilling everyone. Poor retarded people.

Board footer