You are not logged in.
how could i not laugh to such level of ignorance, do not doubt it.
When a point you were trying to make, is made FOR you by another,.......... it dont get much better than that!!
Cant make this stuff up either.
Bar is open. Z is buying.
https://pics.me.me/kuvaton-com-rome-200 … 347817.png
Laugh to that, boy.
Sad but true
https://pics.me.me/kuvaton-com-rome-200 … 347817.png
Laugh to that, boy.
This is completely not history, in the least, omitting both Arab islamic, and western based slave trades, interference and exploitation of Africa, and the near total consumption of its large fauna
Dionysus wrote:https://pics.me.me/kuvaton-com-rome-200 … 347817.png
Laugh to that, boy.This is completely not history, in the least, omitting both Arab islamic, and western based slave trades, interference and exploitation of Africa, and the near total consumption of its large fauna
China was exploited by many country's during it's existence, even long before Africa was colonized but look at them today and look at Africa, compare those two, if u can.
So, u have no argument there.
Dionysus wrote:https://pics.me.me/kuvaton-com-rome-200 … 347817.png
Laugh to that, boy.This is completely not history, in the least, omitting both Arab islamic, and western based slave trades, interference and exploitation of Africa, and the near total consumption of its large fauna
Why Africans did not exploit Europe?
Europeans had a civilization 3000 years ago, why aren't Africans?
Last edited by arijevac (2019-11-22 03:18:26)
Zatoichi wrote:Dionysus wrote:https://pics.me.me/kuvaton-com-rome-200 … 347817.png
Laugh to that, boy.This is completely not history, in the least, omitting both Arab islamic, and western based slave trades, interference and exploitation of Africa, and the near total consumption of its large fauna
Why Africans did not exploit Europe?
Europeans had a civilization 3000 years ago, why aren't Africans?
Lack of horses, dense jungle for much of the continent, like duh, Horsepower and mastery of K9 makes all the difference in building of civilizations that sustain and grow, last, vs without, which is arbitrary to the whole racial matter argument anyway, its incidental where horses were abundant vs not, you can't get the same things done as well or as quickly with say elephants or camels, you can do a lot, but only up to a point, horsepower frees up so much physical and mental usage time, that improvement of convenience, innovation, drive to evolve technology becomes an extra curricular activity that pays off well, because you have more done, by horses, and therefore expand in population under an increasing education and living standard level, meaning even more invention, manufacturing, and infrastructure that streamlines itself more and more over time
Last edited by Zatoichi (2019-11-22 04:07:08)
how is that racist