You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
#241 Re: Feedback » Omaha suggestion » 2012-07-31 13:52:30
That could work! Also waiting for Omaha.
edit. works quite good, but I'm not sure if mines were disabled. Anyway, the battleship is quite good idea, however it shouldn't spawn so close to the beach, could be a bit further but would be nice if it was possible to shoot from 2 positions without moving it (less chance somebody beaches it). And there should be always admins on omaha, so we could kick very 'untalented' gunners.
#242 Re: Feedback » Omaha suggestion » 2012-07-30 17:43:37
u would have to remove defguns then. And then... the ship? 
. It's Omaha, not berlin. I don't really know what to do with this map, but perhaps some penalties for axis would be possible, like 1 grenade for their team. If not, perhaps no mines and expacks for everyone and additional jeeps, apcs, tank for allies? The point is to let allies pass axis first line more often.
#243 Re: Feedback » Omaha suggestion » 2012-07-30 17:20:21
I posted a nice reply here, but it didn't snow up 
with TK ON admins could kick most annoying naders for tk. Now it looks like u have 1v1 with another medic on short distance and another enemy throws a grenade under u both.
#244 Re: Feedback » Omaha suggestion » 2012-07-30 13:23:08
Still don't understand.
You wan't 5 guys in tanks (and 3-4 in defguns and ship) to determine result of the game? Because I have no idea what the rest can do against those tanks. Or perhaps u think someone will take zookas and wait 3 minutes for an enemy tank to come (would look like teamplay on public server!)? As u still didn't explain how u see it playable, I think your suggestion is unacceptable.
#245 Re: Feedback » Omaha suggestion » 2012-07-30 12:39:41
Axis with 3-4 tanks, allies without nades and mines? What do u mean game would be more dynamic?
#246 Re: Feedback » allow attacking mains ? » 2012-07-30 03:46:10
No. That's weird, but these are actual rules. I hate that sniper rule for example (that's the reason I'm about to stop flying, cause I don't want to keep jumping like some ADHD clown waiting for a plane, but I respect it. Same u should respect basecamp rule.
#248 Re: Report Abuse » Kicked while heading for gold » 2012-07-27 15:20:54
imo its a low action and the admin must be punished for his deal...
Well, what kind of punishment do u want for ursefl, Timmos? 
#249 Re: BF1942 Discussion » cheater » 2012-07-26 17:50:33
you stand at waterline and fire the zook then switch to pistol and move forward to the swimming begins...
Are u talking just about firing without causing any damage? . If so, it's not that complicated, many guys sometimes do that, and I don't know why u need water for this. Is it different than same thing with, lets say, no4?
#250 Re: BF1942 Discussion » cheater » 2012-07-26 17:47:47
U should know that. If u arent sure if all his shots caused damage, it could be a bug. U said he killed u, was it with his first shot? Or perhaps it was like in my video?
#251 Re: BF1942 Discussion » cheater » 2012-07-26 10:50:25
I have something like this 
#252 Re: Report Abuse » Abusing by admins » 2012-07-11 23:02:55
Hah, finally an interesting topic. If u remove his rights, I gonna be in the first half on the admin list
#253 Re: Videos and Screenshots » High Scores » 2012-07-05 22:18:59
And ive never had even 100 . 97 happened once, as far as I can remember.
#254 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Admin- Hater- Club? *facepalm* » 2012-07-02 21:50:45
Today I and that Shadow were waiting for a tank on Stalingrad, suddenly he shot me, so I kicked him. He was like wtf, probably thought Id kicked him for the vehicle.
Btw. we were waiting in a wrong place. The tank respawned 10 meters away. 
#255 Re: Report Abuse » banned vamp & gorilka » 2012-07-01 17:53:10
That gorilka who drove a tiger with a jeep's speed?
#256 Re: Feedback » sniper » 2012-06-30 22:45:00
Ah, it reminds me of Apostles of Midway during Christmas time
#257 Re: News and Announcements » 84 players slots this weekend » 2012-06-30 21:28:49
If u remove commands kicks and ban without a reason, it is a bad idea. I would trust admins with using commands, but its really annoying if u have to type !bsfv1month .17 every time when a guy changes keyhashes.
#258 Re: Report Abuse » admins be more strict please » 2012-06-30 19:58:16
Banning them 1 day does not help.
Perhaps I am naive, but I believe it helps.
#259 Re: Feedback » sniper » 2012-06-30 19:56:42
Hell no, I hate half allied team being snipers on Omaha. Imagine what would happen if we increase its damage.
#260 Re: News and Announcements » 84 players slots this weekend » 2012-06-30 16:03:17
I heard tuia was playing just before the crash, perhaps thats the reason @@.
#261 Re: News and Announcements » 84 players slots this weekend » 2012-06-30 14:49:28
All commands don't work, even !nextmap.
Autokick doesn't work.
14.55, server down, can't rejoin
15.15 connected
#262 Re: Feedback » Kickback » 2012-06-30 04:19:54
Frenemy wrote:Please remove kickback right away, its the most awful setting in the entire game. Any experienced player would know this. Kickback does only one thing and thats punishing fair players.
Why punishing fair player? 15% is not much. On some ru Server the rate is on 100% or something, and this is very annoying.
Lets just test it. This is for the people who shoot on friendly planes for example and didnt know.
Agree 100%
#263 Re: Feedback » Friendly fire » 2012-06-27 23:57:15
I also prefer it on 100%. Just wait for all players to get used to it again. Now, when it was on 0%, many noobs were just shooting other teammates without any consequences. Same with manned vehicles, so u can't even get out for a moment without having ur tank/plane damaged.
Also makes me joyful that I gonna be able to kick those brainless nadespammers .
If not 100%, I'd agree for every percentage higher than 30.
#264 Re: News and Announcements » Mumble voice server » 2012-06-26 14:53:22
I'm talking about mumble voices. Not game sounds.
#265 Re: News and Announcements » Mumble voice server » 2012-06-26 13:20:47
Well, I understood it like u hear ur mumble mates' voices from where their soldiers are in the game?
If so, do u also hear them louder when they are closer than others?
#266 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Switching maps, allowed or not? » 2012-06-26 13:16:24
I have a question, do crashes disrupt mapcycle? I had this situation today. Was Gazala, next was Guadalcanal, typed !nextmap and I saw Aberdeen. Guadalcanal crashed after a minute and it (Guadalcanal) restarted. And the next map was Omaha (where's my Aberdeen?) and again Gazala after that.
#267 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Switching maps, allowed or not? » 2012-06-25 14:53:22
AA, spam alert, I gonna check this topic in a few hours then, see u
#268 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Switching maps, allowed or not? » 2012-06-25 14:42:57
U could say the same of Berlin, when all the best players are in the axis team and allies have no views to get out.
#269 Re: BF1942 Discussion » Switching maps, allowed or not? » 2012-06-25 14:34:33
3x gazala in 1 hour is an abusive behaviour and i never did that or never saw someone who did.
I don't say somebody switched to gazala 3 times, but switching to any map disrupts the mapcycle.
Ive done it when requested because some running map had been played, for example 2 rounds before.
That's what I'm talking about, u had probably played that map 2 rounds before because somebody also changed the map.
i dont want a admin discussion online
A section for admins would be appreciated
#270 BF1942 Discussion » Switching maps, allowed or not? » 2012-06-25 14:23:09
- Dudeck
- Replies: 30
Can admins switch the maps as they want? I only runnext after the crash, but some admins change maps as they like. They just use commands !setnext, which makes nonsense situations, like 3x gazala in 1 hour.
And today (just 5-10 mins ago) one admin ran next map just after 10 mins of gameplay, it was aberdeen, and he said he don't want to wait for a tank, because allied had an advantage.
It must be made clear: allowed or not?