You are not logged in.
At 24:01 GMT on the Simple Tanks a Lot Aberdeen server I was banned by an Admin using the alias "Spoon". The command to ban me was issued as disruptive gameplay. It was the beginning of a round. I was the only Axis player. "Spoon" was one of three Allied players one of whom was player X-Tuga who I hope will back me up on this as he was present and saw it. The other allied player I know to be honest uses the name "al". I was spawned, and 1 minute from base when I was banned. A completely invalid ban. A malicious ban by a cloaked Admin. This is the second time in as many days that a cloaked Admin has abused their powers to punish me without a valid reason. Other players are starting to notice a connection between known cheats and certain (at the moment) unnamed Admins that is collusion for the purpose of pecuniary advantage.
At 21:59 GMT on the Simple Tanks A Lot Aberdeen server a player called "Player" attempted to team kill me, and upon failing, kicked me for team killing. The log will show there were 2 minutes left to go of the round and I had not made a single team kill. "Player" joined the server and immediately attempted to team kill me. This is obviously an Admin using an alias for the purposes of foul play. I really think that Admins should be forced to wear the name their Adminship was issued under. That way they cannot hide from players they have a grudge against in abusing their positions.
Admin e.S is a piece of slime. You should see the company he keeps. Cowardly worm.
It's not that I thought there was no Admin, I just didn't know the Admin was e.S (because he was not using his usual name). Had I seen Admin e.S join the server I would have immediately left, as I had been doing since he last targeted me and threatened to ban me again. Between those times Admin e.S also hunted me down on the server when I was the only player there and brought along two of his friends (known and simon and deeko) who are known cheats. The purpose of this little exercise was to goad me so I could be banned again. It seems this thread also shows that Admin e.S is not very well liked by plenty of other players. He's a snake. He's a coward. He is abusing his Admin rights. I am not the only one who thinks he should be stripped of them. But I am the only one challenging him publicly to 1vs1 with the stakes being that if I lose, I take a permanent ban. If he loses, he surrenders his Admin rights. I've got more to lose than him, or have I? - if he's banning for fun then obviously he's got more to lose than me. He might have to stop pulling the wings off flies and that gives him pleasure.
When you cant get a game after 10pm Euro time you'll realise that I actually put in a lot more duty to the server than you do e.S. All you do is turn up to see if you can ban me as a bonus to the meagre time you spend there. Added to this after you made it clear you had a personal vendetta against me the evidence of which is in another thread, I decided to leave the server whenever you joined so that your excuse was removed. The only reason I am currently banned is because you crept into the server like a snake under a different name.
Here' is how to permanently ban me e'S. Accept a 1vs1 challenge on Aberdeen. If I lose, I take a permanent ban. if you lose, you surrender the Admin rights you are abusing.
There is history. Around 2 weeks ago e.S joined the server which was empty except for me, instantly behind him arrived as if by magic, simon and deeko. That's the kind of company he keeps. I know what the plan was, to rile me up so that e.S could ban me. You're a petty, little man e.S. in every sense. I am appealing against my ban because of this. You are not fit to be an Admin. You are a snake.
So the Admin was you e.S. Well if you had been using the name e.S I would not be banned because after last time every time you join a game I simply leave. It is quite apparent you have a personal vendetta against me.
I was banned for a month from Aberdeen by an Admin who told me to "stfu" when the round began and I appealed to my team mates (4 of them including the Admin) for cooperation and communication before I had even spawned. The Admin's ban was for disrupting game. Very difficult to do if you aren't actually playing.
Sometimes I swear at my enemies. Sometimes I swear at my team. Each time I swear I pay the penalty until the auto-kick comes in. I am aware of the consequences. I have given up high Kill vs Death Ratio scores to auto-kick from swearing. Unlike some people who swear in non English language all the time. And those who exploit certain technical aspects of the game with 3rd party knowledge to use as an advantage to create an unfair situational gain against honest players can carry on their practises without fear or repercussion. These lawless individuals do not receive a kick, a ban. Even if they did they'd successfully evade it. When I get mine I have to serve them. As to whether or not I will change after the ban? Why would I after 14 years of play. We can end it right now e.s, by going a month into the future. As soon as I see you I am going to call you a fucking coward. That will elicit a language warning from the console. And a 3 month ban for calling you a coward. Around Springtime I'll see you again. After that I'll see you in a year. Then I can start a 10 year ban beginning in 2018 because, to be quite frank, you've got less balls than a castrated poodle.
Admin e.s is slime. I will join you. He is welcome to the server.
You started a year ago e.s? You sad piece of fucking shit. You're an Admin with a personal vendetta. I don't care if you want to extend the ban to be permanent you fucking pathetic weasel. Go ahead you pusillanimous creep. Carry on playing with your cheat friends that never suffer any penalty. You're scared of me and with good reason. Fucking douche.
If the server would rather have cheats being allowed to play without penalty than bad language then all I can say is fuck you.
Thank you Tuia for daring to include me, however, I would like to be removed from the list. After consideration of the controversy my name is bound to cause. I have not proven in any kind of dedicated contest that I am the best tanker. This is a vote, and by extention will be partly a personal preference that does not include any raw facts like Kill Death Ratios. I know that I will not win any kind of popularity contest.
Sunshine, that's more than most are prepared to do. Suggest a server and time of your choice. Seeing as Simple doesn't have a dedicated 1vs1 Aberdeen we'll have to duke it out somewhere.
What the fuck is this? I'm the best tanker hands down. Everyone here mentioned as best is shit scared to take me on 1vs1 despite repeated public challenges. And there is a very important prize position missing called Best Cheat.
They're back. They're cheating. They're scum. They are joined by Maks who at least only uses the map hack.
It's not a good map or a good theme. It could be made better by having all the Allied armor spawn points on their airfield at the back. Removing air power (if I'm correct historically, Allied air power could not help the paras at Arnhem due to bad weather). This way the Axis would always get across the bridge and the paras would have to hold the area until Allied armor turned up, thus making the map at least a bit more historically accurate, while still giving the Allies a chance to beat Axis back over the bridge. I think this would produce a far more interesting scenario.
Not only is this map hideously unbalanced, it's historically a load of bullshit. There were no Americans at this battle, it was British paratroops. And Axis had the advantage not Allies. I would remove the map completely as 9 out of 10 times it's a guaranteed Allied win from the start when the two bridges become choke points. Allied planes? Not only do they get fighters they get a bomber.
When my ban is up I am officially announcing my intention, to run for position of Admin and I promise just like Donald J. Trump, that I will build a great, great wall to keep the cheats out. And yes, the cheats will pay at that wall. Additionally, I will kick any player who is disrupting the team with cowardice. We don't need babies. We need winners who know how to make a deal and cooperate. I am also once I am Admin, going to have an investigation of the current Admins. We're going to drain the swamp. Get rid of the crooked and corrupt administration. We're going to take back Aberdeen and make the map great again. To any protestors I have this to say "Get 'em the hell outta here". I'm gonna shell the shit out of 'em folks.
So what you are saying D-Day, is that when a round starts and one of the team members asks for cooperation, you prefer to ignore common sense and pretend to be a deaf dumb and blind mute. Then you wonder why I don't spawn. I wonder myself, why I even bother asking for cooperation. Why do I bother reporting enemy tank types and numbers and headings and positions in the team chat? It's not about getting my way, it's about getting a team together. No surprise you are ignorant of these things. As for your two-cents, I wouldn't give you a penny dreadful for them.
Coonic, clearly you have not read my thesis which is the subject of this post. If you had you'd realise that the M10 is superior in nearly every way. And no, I'm not afraid. I'm Fear Incorporated. Players like you are hill sitting long range cowards. I love those kind. There is a special pleasure in closing them down.
They'll probably shit themselves when my application gets through.
Arkos that's not true the Panzers are not the cannon fodder MY Tiger is. That's why it's always up front instead of sitting like a fat useless lump on top of a hill and going into reverse the moment it sights the enemy. Or hiding behind a screen of lights like Maxs. You got the wrong guy if you want to critisize my tactics. You are arguing with Heinz Guderian not me. "Little tank follows big tank". That's how it works.
Guilty on all counts. And a whole lot more. It's pricks like you who provoke me. You join my team on purpose to piss me off. Then you whinge here. You're a pimple on an ass.
Angle of impact is important - a glancing shot produces less damage. Most tankers still know to present a head on hull first target. The glancing shot can be teased out of an enemy by a "shimmy". However, this is a very unpredictable situation. The armor and cannon and handling characteristics between the Tiger and M10 are however, a game physics model that is set in stone. This become apparent when both tanks are placed on an equal footing such as 1vs1 duel with no extraneous factors. Point 9) The Flank Shot. This can easily be proven by armor trials. For example every tanker wishes to make the straightest profile flank shot to tracks/side, and this produces the one shot kill on light tanks for the M10, but not the Tiger.
You can always challenge me Coonic. And even bring along a witness. But this topic is not the time or place so please keep to the subject if you have anything critical to offer as other players have done.
Arkos, have you tried armor trials? Have a go at shooting a light to the flank or side of tracks. The M10 makes the light burn one shot. The Tiger cannot produce the same effect with a single shot. This is point 9).
Neither produces a 1 shot kill. I have seen it happen only once and because of that it must have been a bug of some kind.
...
1 Shot on the Tracks from the side and both are down... From the back it's not possible at M10, (as far as i know), and i don't know if it works to destroy the Tiger from behind with one shot for sure, ... i mean allways.
Also shooting at the tracks from the front works... but from the side is easyer.
...
9) Flank shots. An M10 can make a light burn with a single shot to the flank or side of tracks. A Tiger takes two shots to kill an enemy light with a hit to the same area. Advantage M10.