You are not logged in.
Sepp wrote:I would like to add that the choices of Admins I made from the poll aren't the only Admins who have taken action against me. Some of the others on the list have as well, but none of those ones have targeted me for personal reasons. There is no point going into details. It simply leads to rebuttal ad nauseum. But if any of the Admins in my shit list wants to wager their Admin rights in a 1vs1 against me that's fine. They lose, they surrender their Admin rights. I lose, they get to ban me for however long they like. Think of it guys, you could get rid of me forever. You know you want to.
.. 2easy!!! ive won several times. and im with m10 against you in the tiger. its 2 easy.
The only thing easy for you Coon, is avoiding 1vs1 against me with the same poor excuse every time. I can always comb through the posts over the YEARS now and demonstrate this to everyone on the forum but that would clog it up. Why don't we settle this issue the proper way. Once, and for all. A 1vs1 Aberdeen between me and you. It must be recorded by an independent observer and the result put on the forum for everyone to see. The stakes are, I lose - you get to ban me for however long you like. Permanent ban if you wish. You lose? Those Admin rights you are abusing you surrender and become a mere mortal like the rest of us.
And I'm not even trying to swap places with you, Coon. I am trying to level the field.
Proof Coon. You've got no proof. Set up a 1vs1 with live stream recording. You win you get to ban me for as long as you like. Lose? Those precious Admin rights you abuse are, gone. . .
I would like to add that the choices of Admins I made from the poll aren't the only Admins who have taken action against me. Some of the others on the list have as well, but none of those ones have targeted me for personal reasons. There is no point going into details. It simply leads to rebuttal ad nauseum. But if any of the Admins in my shit list wants to wager their Admin rights in a 1vs1 against me that's fine. They lose, they surrender their Admin rights. I lose, they get to ban me for however long they like. Think of it guys, you could get rid of me forever. You know you want to.
I can only cast one vote so I haven't voted but a choice of three would be nice. That's Jazzy banned for favouring his clan mates. Coon banned because he's a coward who wont back up his nancy mouth. E.s banned because he's a sick minded petty little creep on a power trip who goes incognito to provoke potential victims. I notice Alvarez Latino isn't on the Admin list otherwise I'd need 4 choices but needless to say he still exercises some Admin powers because just today that pos used the game cmd to kick me so maybe his rights haven't been cleaned out yet.
I don't know who you are Ass Hair. But obviously you know me enough to comment. And seeing as you want any excuse to fart, I will be missed in some way or another.
Earlier on today I abused player deeko and had no respect for him. I called him a shitty cheat. I am reporting this abuse based on the server requirements to respect all players. I have clearly broken these rules and deserve to be punished. A 1 week (or month depending on Admin) ban I think is due. Thank you.
I am requesting a 1 week (or one month depending on Admin) ban for myself because there are too many cheats. I will not share a server with cheats like simon or deeko. So you must ban me rather than them. The ban you issue will stick as unlike the cheats I am unable to evade it. Thank you.
One month ago, I was banned for one week by Admin e.S, who was using an alias not his forum and Admin name. I did not contest the ban. Since when does a one week ban turn into a month long ban? Seeing as I have served one month for a one week ban, I think this Report Abuse section of the forum is the proper place to state my case rather than the Ban Appeals section.
Isn't it great that mere mortal players can be banned for bad language, disrupting gameplay (which often is two players on the same team having a set to with eachother), or even not playing/spawning, but cheats operate with impunity. They can openly boast not just in game but here on a server forum, about their cheating. I know they can't be stopped, except every time they are identified. The most important thing for, Admins to remember is that a ban is no different from a kick to the cheats. So don't ban, that just makes a mockery of the action taken. Kick them. Kick them every chance. If there's one thing a cheat loves it's getting a bigger score than anyone else. Kick them and take away their scores every time. That is the only way you can make any difference. Do not ban someone who evades the ban with such ease. Kick. Kick. Kick.
But in the meantime, do carry on banning people for far less offences knowing that ban will stick. It'll do a good job of depopulating the server and making more room for the cheats you can do nothing about.
If you are somewhere the laws on self protection are strict and most forms of weapon are illegal, then I can suggest a high powered LED hand torch/flashlight with 3 modes. 1st mode hi-power.2nd mode low power. 3rd mode strobe. For about 50 Euros you can get into the good makes and brands. They have a crenelated strike bezel on the rim. On hi-power one of these LED torch/flashlights will hurt the eyes if pointed at them. On strobe mode the effect is remarkable. One cannot stand the dazzling effect of the strobe emitted to be able to look in the direction it comes from. Look into the strobe for the time it takes to blink and the next thing you know there's pulsating blotches of red/green/blue obscuring your vision as if you've stared at the sun. The strike bezel on the rim also makes a very effective jabbing tool for self defense should things get up close.
I believe in ancient technology having similar or more advanced powers than today. But whatever that technology was I think was more of a manipulation of physics through occult means rather than nuts and bolts machinery. So thank you for the video link, but I've watched enough of those to form my opinion.
I don't want to join a clan. Whatever they do isn't public anyway. The server I am suggesting would be public.
Then you don't see a need for a policeman to wear his uniform. He can just turn up at work in his sneakers and jogging bottoms. And by his blending in with everyone else, this will not prevent crime. But it allows the cloaked cop to exercise his power when he chooses. Selectively. I'm afraid I don't agree with your naivety Dakota. This particular Admin never uses his real name and he actively collaborates with known cheats.
As a tanker who never plays any other map than Aberdeen I would like to request a dedicated Simple Aberdeen 1vs1 server with 2 player slots, 10 tickets per side, and 20 minute rounds. No flag caps. Every weapon disabled except the wrench so that you die with your tank. This is the optimum set up for such a server. Over 3 rounds maximum, that take less than an hour, 1vs1 tank matches could be decided.
Ah. So it was you e.S. It all makes sense now. Chief among the BF Mafia is probably you. After all, you and your friends the Cheat Brothers simon and deeko are all in the cosy club. It wasn't long ago that I was the only player on Simple Aberdeen and you joined with Laurel & Hardy all under aliases, with the obvious purpose of goading me. That didn't work though because I never play against them. I left the server immediately. And that's what I'd do if you joined the server under your real name. So you would not have to even ban me. But if you want to permanently get rid of me e.S, here is a challenge for you. Set up a 1vs1 match between you and me on a Simple server. The stakes are I lose, I take a permanent ban. You lose and you surrender those Admin rights you are abusing.
I was just banned for 1 week by a player who was an Admin but using an alias other than one I recognize to be an Admin. This seems to be a recurrent theme across various threads. Am I alone in assuming that any player issued Admin rights should be bound to appear in game under the name which their Admin rights were issued? In several threads it is apparent that there is a BF Admin Mafia who exercise authority without identity, and in other cases collaborate with players who use third party knowledge to gain pecuniary advantage. Either way it stinks.
Racism is perfectly natural. It is also as valid a belief system as any other. When it comes to absolutes like science race is quantative. Qualitive is something relative to preference. I wish you well.
simon and deeko refer to the new version as aimlock. If it's not that then they or glitching or bugging hitboxes. These hackers can't be stopped. If they could, then all of them would be under a perma ban that stood. Some of them have the ability to crash a server which partially explains why some Admins appear to be in cahoots with them.
The Focke Wulf 190 is missing from the vanilla fleet of aircraft. If that was included, then the Mustangs would not feel so comfortable. I never fly, but the rare occasions I play maps with two Mustangs on they seem to dominate and inflict an inordinate amount of damage on ground forces. A fairer distribution for those maps would be 1 Mustang plus 1 Spitfire Allied, and 1 BF109 and 1 FW190 Axis.
That player name was on Simple Aberdeen the same day. His real name is simon or deeko. A pair of known cheats. The reason they never use the names they registered their Simple account with is because a lot of the BF1942 community know them as cheats, and even newer players realise they are being cheated eventually. If they used their real names then players old and new would know all the time. Pair of Estonian hacker brothers who have been known to maliciously crash BF1942 servers when they get punished. So there is nothing you can do, except refuse to play them when you spot them. I suspect some server owners are aware of them, but allow their cheating because they are hostage to a server crash.
Banned on Simple Aberdeen for not playing. I am not asking for the ban to be lifted. I don't know how long it's for. But I would rather be banned than play with cheats. Coonic, I challenge you to 1vs1 you can video it and it can be posted to the Simple website the stakes are you win I am banned for life you lose, you surrender the Admin rights you are abusing. How about it. I've got 15 years of honest play to lose. All you've got to lose is your Admin rights.
Quite a lot doesn't add up about this incident. So much that it's hard to know where to begin and we only have just begun if we're faced with knowing the motives of the shooter and official narrative so far. Some of the more telling things are that most gambling playboy multi-$ millionaires don't fit the description and temperament of the typical lone wolf shooter. Just how did he manage to amass 20 or30 guns, stockpile masses of ammunition, erect two purpose built shooting platforms, and install his own security cameras outside his room in a Las Vegas casino which must be one of the most tightly controlled environments there are. There are approximately 2,000 cameras in the immediate vicinity of the casino yet we've seen no footage released. All we've seen shaky phone cam footage that doesn't really show hundreds of people being mowed down and the resultant bloodbath that would be inevitable. Some of the photos, even shown on BBC News websites appear photoshopped with irregularities and staged scenes. As usual, there's hardly any evidence for what they say happened. A little delve into his past shows that Brian Paddock's father, just happens to have been a notorious professional bank robber who was on the F.B.I's 10 Most Wanted list between 1946 and 1967, when they finally caught and imprisoned him with a long sentence. But he managed to escape the maximum security jail he'd been put in pretty quickly and then went on the run robbing banks until they caught up with him again in 1977. This time his punishment for escaping and robbing more banks was a mere slap on the wrist - he served just 1 year before release. I believe Brian Paddock's father became a person of interest to the security and intelligence services and was brought on board as part of the MK-Ultra program because of his apparent skills. His son seems to have also been MK-Ultra'd and as with all patsies or agents, they have their handlers.
No Spitfire was capable of breaking the sound barrier because it's physically impossible for propeller aircraft with traditional shaped surfaces to do so without tearing the aircraft apart at the sound barrier envelope. The Bell X-1 that broke the sound barrier for Americans after WW2 incorporated the swept wing shape of the ME-262 necessary for supersonic flight. The Americans still had problems with the Bell X-1 though, and these were not solved until a rather fortuitous visit by some Bell employees to a British research facility that was building it's own competing design to be first to break the sound barrier. Well, the American tourists noticed something different about the British tail plane design which very quickly found it's way into the tail plane design of the Bell X-1, thus enabling it to break the sound barrier. For this reason I do not believe in some tales of German jet pilots or even rocket plane pilots breaking the sound barrier at the end of WW2. The wing surfaces of advanced German aircraft in production at the end of WW2 were pointing in the right direction of going supersonic, but the tail designs were still based on regular ones which probably means even the Germans were not aware of the sound barrier envelope or its physics. As good as those ME-262 jet fighters were, I don't think their engines were capable of pushing though the sound barrier. That would have required a new engine design and lets not forget that the Bell X-1 credited with breaking the sound barrier was a rocket propelled aircraft. This shows how much more power you need to punch through the envelope and come out the other side supersonic.
Everyone else here thinks it's called cheating. Except the Cheat Brothers, simon and deeko. Hardly surprising really. Simon's self admitted exploitation is a modus operandi that guides every aspect of the way he plays the game.
That's the end of my statements because the thread, apart from Johnny's opening complaint has now gone beyond it's purpose and what is being discussed belongs in a different thread.
Cicero, I used alternate names precisely because as I am sure you will remember along with players like Aage who no longer play and Bat who still does, simon and deeko were wreaking havoc on the Aberdeen server totally unchecked and were targeting not just me but others. But then, after a while, when even this made no difference because no Admins were ever present to stop it, I decided to use only my real player name and thus it has remained. I do not hide from Admins or cheats. A line has been drawn in the sand. I was always Sepp, and I still am. simon and deeko, and some Admins, will not appear under their real player names for whatever reason that is. You can draw your own conclusions.
Yeah, I quit as soon as I realised it was you and brother deeko I was playing against. Because you are a pair of cheating scumbags. Try appearing on the server under your names simon and deeko. That way everyone will be able to identify the cheats.
It should be a requirement that is mandatory and hard wired into the server that Admins appear under the name that their Adminship was given to prevent them hiding. Some of them even collaborate with the known cheats. Take Admin e.S for example. He actually joins in with simon and deeko. I don't know why. Maybe there is something in it for him. Double benefits. Admin and third party exploiter.
When you've been there 15 years Johnny, then you might understand. If you think I am useless then stick around on the server until later on and you'll find I am always the last person standing. That's your chance to teach me a lesson 1vs1. I look forward to it. Other than that, I am guilty of everything you said. Do I have any apologies? None. You know my name. Everyone knows my name. Hardly anyone knows the name of the cheats or even some of the Admins because they do not operate under the same names. Here I stand, to be counted. No hiding. And I accept whatever punishment is issued. Unlike the cheats I actually serve my time. Even though it would be relatively easy to circumvent a ban, I would have to use a different name to escape detection. Not my style.