Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 10

#91 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-10 18:07:40

DC

You are wron. Kob. It os about the fail decisions he made. I do not accept it and provoke him untiö he can explain it to me or apologizes for it. Thats is my intention, nothing more. Dont interpret sth in my actions what you do not know wink
I bet the first kick was caused by personal issues, too.

Who did i provoke besides syndrum?

#92 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-10 12:58:50

DC

http://team-simple.org/forum/userlist.p … ir=ASC&p=7

Sometimes, denny, you should check things before you are writing about them. big_smile

And seriously i do not care if i am a member or a player, dunno why i should care about it...

#93 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 19:49:58

DC

4fun the artclan who likes posting random pictures.

#94 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 18:36:19

DC

Okay then i summarize it without any flame:

1. kick without reason(after long discussion and different tries of explanations syndrum said it was a mistake)
2. kick completely without reason http://team-simple.org/stats/chatlog.php?id=310
3. ban without reason, just because of personal issues as lots of admins mentioned ingame and in this threadhttp://team-simple.org/stats/chatlog.php?id=308
4. ban of everlast, too harsh and as I can see also without reason
5. kick of moonlight, kick too harsh, warn command exists aswell and it is not sure if he even act against the rules...


So 5 fail decisions in 2 days. With those amount of fail decisions should he really stay admin?

#95 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 18:07:39

DC

Next 4fun member.

Right you go under my level, you try to real life flame me, just because showing that a member of you is a crap admin.
Stay on topic, boys.

Next one pls.(kobra, bora?)

#96 Re: Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 17:54:27

DC

Well sim tell it also all the admins who are kicking and banning for those kind of things, just because they dont like it

#97 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 17:52:38

DC

Wtf is he talking?

I just showed that syndrum is a crap admin and it is not just my opinion.

Syndrum is a member of 4fun and all 4fun kiddies are now joining this thread and try to flame me, wtf.

#98 Re: Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 17:41:44

DC

That means it is not a rule? So everyone can use the xpacks if it is possible.

So tuia pls do the favour and give this information to the whole admin teams, about the xpacks and about the carriers. It is frustrating every player and confusing aswell.

Red dont ask me, ask the admin(i guess zody) why he is doing it...

#99 Re: Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 17:31:44

DC
Timmos wrote:

carrier is allowed to be bombed, don't know what idiot admin is kicking for it.. But a carrier isnt a safe heaven

I guess it was zody but he does not react on pm or xfire or ingame chat but logs will show it


To red: on guadal and el ala xpacks work.

#100 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 17:02:34

DC

Who says that it was worth a ban? Just you, if such things is worth a ban, then ban pls the half of the guys on the server.

I just see min. 10 guys including the best admins who think that you just kick and banned me for no reason, just because of personal issues and they know what happened before, cause they know this thread.

Still saying it: crappest admin ever. Seems so that the most guys think the same about you big_smile

http://team-simple.org/stats/chatlog.php?id=310

Haha that was kick yesterday 13:45. again without reason. Or explain me please what i did wrong big_smile

#101 Re: Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 15:27:14

DC

Just to mention one more thing about the different kinds of admins:

Xpacking flag: Some kicking for it, some not, but it is at the moment allowed, means few guys kicking for no reason.

Today: Bombing carrier(midway), lots of admins on, most admins said it is not forbidden, but one admin kicking 2-3 player for it(dunno who the admin is).

Can the admins please make clear decisions and judge equal? The admins should kick when players act against the rules, not when they are pissed of some and think they are doing illegal things...

#102 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 15:24:30

DC

I tell facts, so what?

Kobra, LastResort, St0n3d and so on were complaining about the ban ingame, if you can read the whole logs.

If you can not handle personal issues, you just use the ignore command instead of baning and kicking. Seriously you are a joke. You make every day mistakes...

Just the 4fun guys are with you, the rest is against you, if you do not see it than you are blind or you are missing something in your head.

#103 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 15:13:45

DC

Next round: 14:08 i was kicked for disruütive playing. I bombed on midway the carrier with plane like 4 other guys. I asked who was it cause everyone said it is allowed. Can someone tell me who kicks again for nothing?

#104 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 14:50:51

DC

http://team-simple.org/stats/chatlog.php?id=308

5 guys asked you why you did it...hahaha. And all of them called you a crap admin. Good job, boy.

#105 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 11:26:43

DC

Since when it is funny to post random pics?

Noone forces you to read it.

#106 Re: Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 11:03:11

DC

Okay thx

#107 Re: Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 02:41:27

DC

Indeed but it is just a logical thinking.

Well I do not see a problem with it at all, just the handling of the admins should be the same. Just an example: It was Guadal ctf: Kobra(pas one), Yoda etc. were on the server and did not kick(even if they were complaining about it), the bora joined an instantly kicked 2 guys for doing it.(command kdis)

So it was confusing for all the players on the server.

Just a side note: I would like to have a rule which says it is not allowed: It is hard enough to gain a flag with so much people playing ctf, with xpacking the flag you have no chance at all.

#108 Feedback » Xpacking flag at CTF allowed? » 2013-11-09 02:30:00

DC
Replies: 25

Hey guys,

today some of us asked ourselves if xpacking the flag in ctf-mode is allowed. Some admins said yes and some admins said no and kicked for it. It would be nice if there would be a clear statement about that issue.

#109 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 02:26:57

DC

dary I would like to but getting instantly kicked and banned without reason destroys the fun on the server.

#110 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 02:06:05

DC
Syndrum wrote:

I trust Sv3n because he is a fair player

Haha you do not know Sv3n, otherwise you would not type that :-D

Suddenly he says sry after showing him that he just talks bs. The logs from the last evening will show the same. It would be so easy: When you kicked me and I rejoined and asked you for what you kicked me? Simple answer could be: Sorry I made a mistake. Period, end of story. But you behave like a baby and invent some bs that few guys asking for it and I was disruptive playing. Wtf? For what do you do that? To feel better or is it so hard to say to yourself: I made a mistake.

Syndrum wrote:

would you say it was a joke or sarcasm.
do you have any more excuses!?

You seriously understand no jokes :-D Haha, what do you think when lec saying lamer, fk and so on. Or timmie calling guys bots, skillless and so on. Or George called me yesterday a skillless dumb. Uuuuuuuhhhh, I think you have to ban them all, cause they mean it so damn serious. :-D

#111 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 01:37:16

DC
Syndrum² wrote:

if you normally talk to me, I do also normal to you. and I explained 2 times why I kicked you
and maybe I'd said sorry for misunderstanding

but you do not even deserve to be treated normally
see how you are responding to me

when i banned everlast for tk. on map battle_of_the_bulge before Gazala.

[2013-11-07 20:39:31]  Everlast: today is not good for me...w
>>>>>>>>>>>[2013-11-07 20:39:47]  DC(el_loco): syn m10 whore :D
[2013-11-07 20:39:47]  St0n3d: !ban .8
[2013-11-07 20:39:51]  Everlast: kkkk
[2013-11-07 20:39:52]  4fun Syndrum : !
[2013-11-07 20:39:58]  4fun Syndrum : !b15mins everl
[2013-11-07 20:40:36]  )m( Lecter: sure
[2013-11-07 20:41:00]  4fun Syndrum : mine all bridges!
[2013-11-07 20:41:00]  DC(el_loco): fu lec ! ;)
[2013-11-07 20:41:10]  jest_pysznie: !nextmap
[2013-11-07 20:41:14]  ugly Bob: !nextmap
[2013-11-07 20:41:42]  : -2
[2013-11-07 20:41:59]  HULK: waw5

GAZALA

[2013-11-07 20:54:01]  DC(el_loco): wtf for what do you kick, nap?

[2013-11-07 20:54:45]  DC(el_loco): wtf
[2013-11-07 20:54:48]  DC(el_loco): nice admin work
[2013-11-07 20:54:52]  DC(el_loco): you kick for nothing
[2013-11-07 20:54:57]  DC(el_loco): best admin ever

[2013-11-07 20:55:16]  DC(el_loco): sven shut it

[2013-11-07 20:55:32]  DC(el_loco): syndrum learn how to admin

[2013-11-07 20:57:36]  DC(el_loco): 4fun nap

and now await the chat logs from today and if I continue it is a book wink

I do not see a problem with my comments, I was just honest and do you want to blame because of saying: "syn m10 whore big_smile" or " fu lec ! wink". That is just a slang and with the emoticons it should be clear that I do not mean it serious or dont you understand sarcasm or humour?

[2013-11-07 20:54:01]  DC(el_loco): wtf for what do you kick, nap? [b] the question, you gave no answer to, nap cause I was pissed, cause you kicked me for nothing(which is a fact)[/b]

[2013-11-07 20:54:45]  DC(el_loco): wtf
[2013-11-07 20:54:48]  DC(el_loco): nice admin work - [b] sarcasm[/b]
[2013-11-07 20:54:52]  DC(el_loco): you kick for nothing [b] fact [/b]
[2013-11-07 20:54:57]  DC(el_loco): best admin ever [b] sarcasm [/b]

[2013-11-07 20:55:16]  DC(el_loco): sven shut it [b] random[/b]

[2013-11-07 20:55:32]  DC(el_loco): syndrum learn how to admin [b] tip for improvement[/b]

[2013-11-07 20:57:36]  DC(el_loco): 4fun nap [b] the truth, as mentioned, lots of guys think so[/b]
DC wrote:

Yeah this logs shows the first situation. You kicked cause Sv3n said: !kick .35 (without reason), then Bond said the same(the guy who was autokicked for 6 tks and today banned. That means they did not even mentioned a reason and you typed kdis. Hahahahaha, you are a jk.

to Bond:

logs wrote:

[2013-11-07 20:50:47]  Christian Stnder: ban bono
[2013-11-07 20:50:48]  DC(el_loco): ban bond pls
[2013-11-07 20:51:23]  [tamplier] Sv3n: dont cry
[2013-11-07 20:51:54]  DC(el_loco): can someone ban bond?

and I recognized another funny thing: After Sven said kick .35, you did it, not when 2 guys were complaining, how you say it :-D

logs wrote:

[2013-11-07 20:52:42]  [tamplier] Sv3n: !kick .35
[2013-11-07 20:52:50]  4fun Syndrum : !kdis .35
[2013-11-07 20:52:54]  BOND: kick 35

biggest selfown ever on this forum :-D

maybe you read one more time to get clear :-D

I found some more interesting things:

timmos wrote:

i dont think you deserve admin rights, first u were trolling the server.. after some asslicking u get admin rights and u suspect everyone for using SOMETHING, you dont even know where u are talking about. which kind of cheat or anything related to it, and then u should make admin decisions? am totally against that some of the newer admins are even admin, while they dont know SHIT of this game

JoJo wrote:

[...]but in the last days there were 2 case where i really wonder how thoses guys can be admins.
1) Yesterday evening i get flamed by Syndrum_Soldier for having a good score on Berlin/Stalingrad. Stuff like "cheater" and "impossible shots".
Wtf? Everybody knows that Infmaps are only about camping.[...]

George wrote:

i don't actually know how he got his admin rights but whatever

Musen wrote:

As Im the one who gave xerox a ban for very good reasons I have a hard time believing that.

M1ke wrote:

Syndrum_Soldier with nice ideas and calling people idiots in-game. As admin Synd should practise behaving a bit.

#112 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 01:22:08

DC

Can the 4fun guys just shut up and leave their uninteresting comments? Just spam, nothing more.

#113 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 01:10:55

DC

no it is easier to ban... I mean one sentence from me is for him a 15minute ban :-D

#114 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-09 00:57:03

DC

Yeah this logs shows the first situation. You kicked cause Sv3n said: !kick .35 (without reason), then Bond said the same(the guy who was autokicked for 6 tks and today banned. That means they did not even mentioned a reason and you typed kdis. Hahahahaha, you are a jk.

to Bond:

logs wrote:

[2013-11-07 20:50:47]  Christian Stnder: ban bono
[2013-11-07 20:50:48]  DC(el_loco): ban bond pls
[2013-11-07 20:51:23]  [tamplier] Sv3n: dont cry
[2013-11-07 20:51:54]  DC(el_loco): can someone ban bond?

and I recognized another funny thing: After Sven said kick .35, you did it, not when 2 guys were complaining, how you say it :-D

logs wrote:

[2013-11-07 20:52:42]  [tamplier] Sv3n: !kick .35
[2013-11-07 20:52:50]  4fun Syndrum : !kdis .35
[2013-11-07 20:52:54]  BOND: kick 35

biggest selfown ever on this forum :-D

Logs from today are interesting too. Post them, you give me the evidences that you suck, thats nice, so I do not have so much work.

Tuia can you put in here the event logs, that shows that Sv3n joined few seconds before and Bond was autokicked?


btw. for Denny an information: Today several guys of your clan were kicked for acting against the rules: StefBaustelic, Otto and Giuseppe, dunno if the last one even got a ban. And read the logs from this evening(starting at 9), some guys said they do not play so often in this server cause the 4fun guys have a too big lobby, means the admins can do what they want and the 4fun players can do whatever they want to. Just read the logs and you can see it.

Maybe time to rename the server from SIMPLE to 4fun...

#115 Re: Feedback » Berlin Uncapped » 2013-11-08 23:30:57

DC

Berlin like UN_Berlin sounds nice but I guess it is unplayable with 64 people on the server. I would like to see how it works if the flags stay as they are, just make the left flag uncap and the other 2 neutral at the beginning.

#116 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-08 23:20:12

DC

22:20 ban for 15 min for language: following i wrote: "syndrum ping 9 and cant hit anything!" Worth a ban? Haha. Baning and kicking becaus of personal issues. Haha.

Btw george and me we do not like each other aswell but he does not kick or ban me for that. big_smile

#117 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-08 22:28:25

DC

Dc, moonlight, everlast.

Syndrum reason of kick today. Still waiting.

Denny seriously stfu, nothing to say but writing the whole time when someone is complaining about one member of your kindergarden clan.

Ldr who are you?

#118 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-08 20:54:18

DC

are you serious syndrum? 3 guys complained about you in 24 hours and u want to make them shut up? that shows just more that you suck as admin.i still got no explanations what i did wrong the last 2 kicks. i am waiting for it.
if u cant, just give back your rights nap admin.

#119 Re: Feedback » Berlin Uncapped » 2013-11-08 17:59:09

DC

Then it makes the map more uneven. The flag allied can capture best in the beginning, is the flag in the left corner. Otherwise it can happen that allied can not leave base.

It would just make sense if you make the mentioned flag as uncap base and grey the other 2 flags in the beginning, that every team starts just with the uncap base flag. Dunno if it would be too much modification.

#120 Re: Report Abuse » Admin kick abuse » 2013-11-08 17:56:02

DC

Well as i can see syndrum wrote that the tank left the base, so attacking is allowed.

To dary: in my opinion you just can allow baserape in some maps, but the problem is for the most public playing guys it would be confusing.

We played 20 minutes ago el ala ctf, there was most times no direct basecamping, even when it was allowed. But this depends of the amount of players and who is playing.

As from few guys already mentioned a more clear basecamp rule would be the possibility.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 10

Board footer