#31 Re: Feedback » Ship respawn in Midway » 2015-08-05 11:11:45

Catpain_Blackadder wrote:
Dashi_Dorzho wrote:

you wrote about realistic in bf 1942? Ahaha you are funny)))
Carriers vs carriers is coral sea. Second carr vs carr map not needed, I think.
and if not to respawn ships after sink then there's no need on respawning tanks, jeeps, planes, defguns... why ships only?
so I think that's bad idea(

   What I mean by "realism" here is following the real battle as far as the framework of the game allows, and not choosing to make it less "realistic" if we don't have to.  Making a map called "Battle of Midway" more of a naval battle and less of an infantry battle makes it more realistic, because the real battle wasn't an infantry battle.  It probably would have become one if the Japanese had won the naval battle, but they didn't (and if they had there still would have had to be a naval battle beforehand).

   Interesting point about not needing a second carrier vs. carrier map, but why can't we have them?  Couldn't we also say we don't need two tank vs. tank maps, or two infantry vs. infantry maps, etc?

   Regarding your question "why ships only," I agree that the same could be done for defguns.  They are similar in that both types are major weapons and very limited in number; with tanks, jeeps, planes, and especially men, the game can't handle the numbers that would have been present at the real battle, so we kind of pretend that they just came in from somewhere else.  It might be interesting to find a way to limit the number of re-spawns for these as well, I guess trivially it could be done by increasing the re-spawn times.

If you want to make game more realistic then we need to do that with all maps, not only midway. for example, we need some tanks in Berlin - in real battle they were. Or we need to create underground fortifications on Iwo jima - they were in real battle, in fact. i mean, why only midway must be realistic?
About no need a second carr vs carr map - i think not all players are pilots. and midway will be the same as coral sea - just spawn (carrier) camping. that's mad. if there will be camping then none of losing team can take plane and fly to the island to prove himself at tanks or inf. and in fact, we have 6 or more tanks vs tanks maps - too much for those who are not good at tanks. and also with inf - we have berlin, stalingrad and omaha - too much for those who are bad in inf.
about defguns - i agree.

#32 Re: Feedback » Ship respawn in Midway » 2015-08-04 23:28:40

you wrote about realistic in bf 1942? Ahaha you are funny)))
Carriers vs carriers is coral sea. Second carr vs carr map not needed, I think.
and if not to respawn ships after sink then there's no need on respawning tanks, jeeps, planes, defguns... why ships only?
so I think that's bad idea(

Board footer