You are not logged in.
Blumenthal again. I like the reputation of TheGrayzone, which is mentioned as a source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grayzone
I also like underside today. You can send them some bullshit and they pay you for it:
Funny that they target British officials only ![]()
First sentence of your "article":
"trustworthy"
I tried to find the original leaks - yes two leaks about this topic existed, one in 2018 and one in 2021, but in the end there isnt one anynomous group. there are multiple. You cant verify this is true. might even have been leaked by the kremlin for propaganda purposes. of course you wanne believe it persia because it confirms your biases. I appreciate the load of nothing you posted with this article btw ![]()
Thats why I said you guys dont know what free press is. The media is not a component of politics. It can be their mouthpiece and supporter, sure, but in a free press you will always have opposing voices, which you guys really dont have. It of course got worse since the invasion of Ukraine, but wasnt anything near to an independent press before.
And please nameless ability to analyse something is as good as his skill to drive a tank in reverse in a league war ![]()
Zody wrote:This is really a topic that is senseless to discuss with Russians since throughout your history you never had real free press
Zody wrote:you had 4 or 5 good years.
https://2ch.life/au/src/5903128/16527305603510.gif
everything you need to know about the level of the opponent under the name zody
thats your problem in this thread and also with the situation right now. you want to win. you have no interest to get to the bottom of this because you wanne win. thats why you believe all the lies that your government throws at you right now. And they know you want to win too.
pshh, good years doesnt mean real free press ![]()
edit: the good years werent really good afterall ![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_j … _in_Russia
comparison with Europe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_j … _in_Europe
I know where I would rather work as journalist ![]()
you had 4 or 5 good years. I give you that:
The British also always claimed that they brought civilization to their colonies. The Empire also brought exploitation, racism and violence. Fitting comparison to Russian imperalism isnt it?
Zody wrote:https://rsf.org/en/index?year=2022
you can go back to 2002.
You re press is free until someone comes around and beats the shit out of you for reporting something they dont like
All Western propaganda of course.
Twitter is a private company and they can do what they want on their platform.
The interesting thing is that Ukraine, where it's only 1 TV-channel allowed to work, where the other TV-channels are closed and blocked, where the other political parties are prohibited, where many people are in prisons for their opinions and many just disappeared... The rating is 106. In Russia it's 155. The lower, the worse. This is all we have to know about these ratings.
In Latvia with one of the top indexes (22) all the Russian TV-channels are banned and citizens being fined for 700 EUR for watching them.
Another interesting thing is that in the English version of the Wikipedia article there is almost no information about criticism of these Reporters Without Borders. In Russian version, criticism takes the half of the article.

Zody wrote:https://rsf.org/en/index?year=2022
you can go back to 2002.
You re press is free until someone comes around and beats the shit out of you for reporting something they dont like
All Western propaganda of course.
Twitter is a private company and they can do what they want on their platform.
in response to my arguments , you post empty chatter with a link to another INDEPENDENT news site, in which, OF COURSE, not neutral news, but another slander of one of the parties to the conflict. rsf.org is a private company and they can do what they want on their platform.
You, like Simon, keep your "high" levelnot answered my question, Q.E.D.
I did, you just didnt like my response and again resorted to call me stupid. stay classy persia.
https://rsf.org/en/index?year=2022
you can go back to 2002.
You re press is free until someone comes around and beats the shit out of you for reporting something they dont like ![]()
All Western propaganda of course.
Twitter is a private company and they can do what they want on their platform.
Zody wrote:Atleast try to be smarter about your pity attempts of deceptions.
Do you really not understand what I'm writing about, or are you pretending?
If - the first, then you are a stupid and uneducated marginal, and there is nothing to discuss with you.
If - the second, then you are trying to troll, but I do not care about it, and there is nothing to discuss with you.
Smart and thinking people will understand what I am writing about. And the rest (like you) - do not care, they do not decide anything.
——————————————————
Ты правда не понимаешь, о чём я пишу, или притворяешься?
Если - первое, то ты неумный и необразованный маргинал, и с тобой не о чем дискутировать.
Если - второе, то ты пытаешься троллить, но мне на это пофиг, и с тобой не о чем дискутировать.
Умные и думающие люди поймут, о чём я пишу. А на остальных (на таких, как ты) - плевать, они ничего не решают.
Why do all you guys always start insulting? Are your arguments and "facts" really this flimsy?
Zody wrote:Its called free press John, something that isnt a thing in Russia
There is no free press in any country in the world. All media cover one or another side of the issue, depending on the source of funding/power. don't be stupid
and next time write your message like john, with translation into Russian
They all have agendas, doesnt mean that they are not free. This is really a topic that is senseless to discuss with Russians since throughout your history you never had real free press.
Why would I translate my message to Russian? Isnt this an English topic?
Its called free press John, something that isnt a thing in Russia. The one saying this is also not the author of the opinion. Its Sergey Karaganov who is being interviewed.
Taken from the article YOU shared:
Atleast try to be smarter about your pity attempts of deceptions.
that Zody again. That's the one who constantly wants to get rid of his nonsense without being asked, isn't it? Why is he bothering me?! The player named Zody doesn't understand that I have neither interest nor time to explain the world to him. Other people should have done that. Well .. of course i wish him only the best for the future and now i say goodbye to him and his spirits in the hope not to bother me in the future. I thank the player Zody in advance.
You re such a snake
Mr. Twoface
So how abusive is Horst with his admin powers really:
Blumenthal found his way out of the washrooms in the Bundestag? what a smart man he is.
"Journalist Alina Lipp" - good joke John
Bandera died in 1959. I hope you know this Gult ![]()
Nameless's comment may have been poking fun or could be viewed as provoking. But to be fair, in this case, Merlin is the one who brought up the "network attack" more than 30mins before Nameless even mentioned it and was just spamming his usual nonsense the whole time.
Log (with irrelevant chat removed):
▼Hidden text
I mean how far do we wanne go back then? 1 year? 2 years? Thats like a egg and the hen situation by now. I still wonder: Why does an admin think its wise to poke the hornets nest? (which resulted into the comments that ultimately got Merlin banned)
Im not defending Merlin. This is a pattern. Merlin goes on one of his frenzies and the usual players poke the Hornets nest for some extra fun. Look through the logs. U ll find countless occasions where this happens. admins should be better than this.
And vojislav: Svetlana v Zwarrior. Ring a bell?
I wonder what the new head admins do about admins who actively try to provoke such reactions:
2022-07-03 21:21:54 : # [Global] inVictus|nдmeless: It's time to treat Merlin's home network
2022-07-03 21:21:54 : # [Global] inVictus|nдmeless: special way.
2022-07-03 21:22:03 : # [Global] Maj.MerliN: isnt my home network
2022-07-03 21:22:06 : # [Global] Maj.MerliN: u moron
2022-07-03 21:22:13 : # [Global] Maj.MerliN: u just tresspassing
We all know Merlin is paranoid, so maybe a ADMIN should tread with more caution, dont you think? And this is not the first time either.
The hill is a good read. global times is a Chinese communist party mouthpiece so you cant expect much from that one. Johns "analysis" is heavily misleading aswell so I suggest reading the hill article yourselves.
P.S.: coming to think of it: John is making stuff up, you might even call it manipulation. Again global times is a Chinese communist party news outlet. The hill is a good read.
Doesnt make the use of it any better just because its a proverb.
check the publishing date. CF isnt the source.
This is what is called a "monkey with a grenade" - the Ukrainian military is not professional, they do not know how to use modern weapons, and because of this, civilian objects are damaged.

"General Pavel weighs 20 stone and is now aged 67 but has been put in charge of troops in eastern Ukraine because Vladimir Putin is running low on senior commanders."
"The officer is so fat that he has to have his uniform specially made and wears two sets of body armour to cover his substantial girth.
He is understood to require five meals a day washed down with at least a litre of vodka.
Russia is believed to up to 10 generals in the war in Ukraine and as many as 30 senior officers.
Latest estimates also suggest that as many as 30,000 Russian soldiers have been killed in action and up to 100,000 have been injured.
Russia has reportedly lost over 4,000 tanks and armoured vehicles, 216 combat aircraft, 183 attack helicopters and 620 drones."
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-new … 7-27328697
I dont trust mirror that much honestly, but kind a hilarious if this is true. The killed in action numbers I have heard before. Your army is in a meatgrinder right now. We will see what happens first: Putin reaching his goals or the Russian army collapsing under the immense attrition suffered.
I think we misunderstand each other.
Nobody tells anyone to write. The media writes about whatever they want, the goverment reads it. If the media writes something the goverment disagrees on then they usualy writes a statement as response to the media and the media doesn't give a shit, usually.
Hug still on the table.
But nameless talked about the major media. I thought your post referred to them in response, so yea a misunderstanding I guess. I take the hug now <3
Defence department, would you like a hug also?
and they told them what to write about? like word by word instructions or how did that work?
nämeless wrote:L0rd Waggachugga wrote:At the same time it shows that he's a little bit on the fence, wheter its because he's waiting to see wich horse wins or to avoid any western sanctions, who knows. But offcourse he's in Russias pocket, no Russia no Tokaev.
Nameless, thats the main differance between western and russian propaganda. Our is written by idiots who whent to journalist School and haven't worked nor experienced much during their life. They write uncritical and without depth. One day they wite about the princess birthday, the next about geopolitical mathers. What drives them is the amount of clicks. What gives more clicks "all good in russia" or "Russia and Kazhakstan arguing"
The southerners favorite newspaper is full of russian propaganda. It's viewpoints are questioned trough debate and not illegalised trough a label as an foreign agent.
Most westerners don't care if Russia and Kazakstan is arguing or not, they see that russia has started a war and is the agressor and automatically take Ukraines side. Does russia have a point on Ukraines treatment of Russian speakers - well yeah, but the invasion of Crimea didn't really improve that nor is a full out war justified.
The head purpose of today's major medias is to form people's opinion using propaganda. It works in Russia, Norway, Guate-fucking-mala, everywhere. The average reader isn't smart, he should run into the sense of the articles like a horse with blinders. There are no many who can doubt what's providen to read and even less who can check the sources and think critically. Every major media, especially the state-controlled ones, have the editorial policy and the general line which has to be abided and submitted by those who work in this media. It's impossible that some article or some reportage could leave the editorial office with no approval.
Corsican monster landed in Juan Bay
The ogre goes to Grasse
The usurper entered Grenoble
Bonaparte occupies Lyon
Napoleon approaches Fontainebleau
His Imperial Majesty is expected today in his faithful Paris
I've worked with media surveilance for the goverment, they can't do anyting about what they writa, no mather how ludacriss it is. They can only write back and disagree, only for it to fall on deaf ears.
Yea sure wagga. I bet that story is true in its entirety. what was your job there exactly?
e.S. asked about German media and I gave him an answer concerning German media. My post is in that context. It is not my problem that you choose to ignore that simple fact.
I meant in the German media concerning Habecks speech today and the comment about an economic attack from Russia on Germany. stop taking things out of context.
I've changed my mind and I think that Ukraine got what they really deserve.
wow.
the one who tked had id 25. test had 53. muppet most likely put in the wrong id
Some norwegian propaganda:
https://finansavisen.no/nyheter/energi/ … sland-grephttps://borsen.dagbladet.no/nyheter/tys … s/76442099
I am curious how this is portrayed in Germany - Russia attacked Germany. Hm... Who implimented sanctions first?
What do you mean by portrayed? They didnt change his speech in the news. Quoted it word by word. Of course you wont find anyone sane to defend Russias actions or what do you mean?