You are not logged in.
Nomax, You fear me in a Tiger. And to be quite frank, for a player who likes to sit on top of a hill in an M10 behind a screen of Shermans, you fear me because I will attack. So when you hog the M10's so you can be safe at the back don't be blaming me for hunting you down in a Tiger. You're a small heart in a big tank. You always die a coward, Nomax, I always die a hero - which brings me back to the topic of this thread. I haven't seen any good reasons not to implement it, if for nothing else than to silence the cackle of the vultures who judge me but wont face me.
Sepp wrote:How about a dedicated 1vs1 Simple Aberdeen server where grudges challenges and scores can be settled and decided? It can't take much to set this up. I expect some kind of log could be kept or produced of these 1vs1's as evidence of kill records and maybe a top 1vs1 player of the month announced in some way. A 2vs2 server the same would be nice as well so that 2vs2's can be fought or alternatively a 1vs1 with an audience of witnesses. I am tired of calling out big shots who back out of a challenge, you know who you are. You know who I am - and you know you want to beat me up, so what are you scared of. No need for hundreds of tickets and no need for a time limit if each side on the 1vs1 has 10 tickets and it's first to 10 kills as the winner, or 20 tickets on the 2vs2. And before any of you bring up Tank Arena, I would like to say don't - the map looks like it was designed by a 12 year old and it's more buggy than a nest of beetles, as well as having over-powered and modelled T-34's that take a Tiger out one shot. Tank Arena? More like Toy Arena.
Sepp, it's not interesting to play against you due to your low skill. I would rather prefer singleplayer mode instead of your challenge.
My low skill? I don't even know who you are. No one? Probably a coward but I don't suppose we'll ever know untill you prove otherwise under the conditions I suggested in this thread. I do notice other people think of you as a pad pussy. That's a good enough reason to refuse a 1vs1 so I'll let you off. I'm looking for a challenge not a chump.
This happend after I was bashing a guy in chat called "BF1946" who tk'ed me multiple times
Bashing a guy in chat normally results in a kick or ban for me. As for multiple team kills, there's an auto kick for 3 team kills so you're obviously lying because BF1946 would have been kicked before you were if this was the case. The words "noob, n00b, n0ob, no0b, nub" and any other iteration of this insult should be added to the lexicon kick.
How about a dedicated 1vs1 Simple Aberdeen server where grudges challenges and scores can be settled and decided? It can't take much to set this up. I expect some kind of log could be kept or produced of these 1vs1's as evidence of kill records and maybe a top 1vs1 player of the month announced in some way. A 2vs2 server the same would be nice as well so that 2vs2's can be fought or alternatively a 1vs1 with an audience of witnesses. I am tired of calling out big shots who back out of a challenge, you know who you are. You know who I am - and you know you want to beat me up, so what are you scared of. No need for hundreds of tickets and no need for a time limit if each side on the 1vs1 has 10 tickets and it's first to 10 kills as the winner, or 20 tickets on the 2vs2. And before any of you bring up Tank Arena, I would like to say don't - the map looks like it was designed by a 12 year old and it's more buggy than a nest of beetles, as well as having over-powered and modelled T-34's that take a Tiger out one shot. Tank Arena? More like Toy Arena.
Sepp, I don't know you but through your fame. I won't bring a personal judgement about you.
But I know lati kinda well, and I know he's not doing bad things with his admin rights. About fem, I know him badly, but he's an FG and in general, FGs are cold-blood and never cause troubles.
There must be a reason around.
It's not fame it's infamy and it belongs to hard nosed bastards. Unless you've known Alvarez Latino for a long while you wont have known his history. He was the first player to team kill me on purpose, I never team killed untill that. He was caught cheating. Anything else? Yes, I watched him on cam once start as Axis take a Tiger drive it to an Allied flag suicide then spawn as Allied and grab the Tiger. As for fem, well my main beef with him is he kicks me for challenging him to 1vs1. I don't know why. At a guess I'd say it's because he's scared of me. But I could be wrong.
Sometimes when I join a team is stacked so I stay out untill it's evens and sometimes a team can be winning by a margin with the top players so if it's evens I stay unspawned. And sometimes I don't even want to play except 1vs1 so I challenge players but mostly they are cowards who back out or refuse and these big shots like collecting 3 points for taking an undefended flag. Me? I get all my points through kills. I do not take flags. I guard a flag untill a team mate arrives then I move on once they've turned it. I could collect a lot more points than I do but I think the points system is the wrong way around. It should be 1 point for a flag 1 point for a kill. Gold medals are not meant for players with 50 points 10 kills and 20 deaths.
I have been banned by either fem or Alvarez Latino without valid reason and because they do not like me. fem avoids 1vs1 challenges then taunts me as scared of him. Alvarez Latino hates me. He used to team kill me on EA 10 and also was caught cheating on that server. If this is the standard of your Admins then can I suggest you apply a more rigorous granting of rights filter so that these kind of power abusive players do not get put in charge?
This is not a ban I cannot get around. So if I am not seen on the server it's because I choose not to be held hostage to fem's cowardice and fear of me, and Alvarez Latino's grudge settling.
I have been kicked multiple times by fem for disrupting game play. Firstly, by not spawning while part of a stacked team. I do not see how this can be disrupting game play. I am waiting unspawned untill the sides even up. He also kicks me because I challenge him to 1vs1 and he doesn't like it - yet he taunts me as being scared. This does not add up to a responsible or honorable Admin. Today, both him and Alvarez Latino (a known and busted cheat from EA 10 days), were kicking me for these reasons. I asked them to stop and warned them that I would lodge a complaint. Eventually I found I was banned. This is not a ban I cannot get around if I choose. This is the first ban I have had in 3 or more weeks which is a record because I have been behaving. Despite the fact that I could if I wished circumvent the ban, I am chosing not to do so, and therefore not to play untill the issue of Admin abuse is addressed.
Player Name: Various and changing, but otherwise known as "Simon".
Server: Tanks a lot!
Reasons: Abuse, insults, team killing.
As a banned player guilty of all charges I expect in the name of fairness that he be considered for the same punishment as me.
My long range skills, George?. Ha. I'm all about long range, it's called Wesping. Maybe you've been the victim of that by me? Probably. That's what artillery is for. Big tanks are for attacking. The tankers who are good at long range are well practiced cowards who like the safety of being in a Tiger or M10 and sat atop a hill at long range behind a screen of team mates in the Panzers or Shermans. I do not respect this way of playing and I show my disrespect for it by attacking in a tank and coming after them. So what you consider to be a much better tanker than me is perhaps more of a coward which by default makes them less of a team player and more of a selfish one because they are hogging the best tanks and taking the least risks. These much better tankers only get brown pants when they see me because they know I wont stop or run and I've hunted them down because I know where to find them. Maybe you should name names and divulge the Top Ten Cowards because I'll lay a penny to a pound they refuse 1vs1 against me. That's the difference between a hero and a coward.
You have finally banned me, thanks to Mahmoud. Out of the hundreds of games I've played most have been without problem. But I have not put 12 years into BF1942 so that people (like Mahmoud) can bad mouth me and back out of challenges THEY initiated. This is most dishonourable. I was a team player and I expected the same support from my team as I gave others. I was an attacking player rather than a park on a hill player at a safe distance and pump shells long range at an enemy who runs and escapes when hit. My tanking was as a hunter up front who was willing to die guts and glory unlike some of you so called pros who take the best tanks and hide behind a screen of team mates because you are scared of risking your lives. All my points came from kills not flags. Many times I stood guard off-flag so that others could pick up easy points. Flags don't shoot back. I was the only player on teams that took the courtesy to warn team mates of flag trouble and report enemy tank types and positions with the in-game chat. Too many selfish players do not bother. Too many selfish players concerned only with scurrying away at the first sign of danger. You know who you are. Gutless cowards. I played as a hero rather than a yellow streaked feint heart. I found this forum to be biased and one sided, as in the recent posts about me 1vs1 against other players - they only talk about when they win not when they lose. Funny that, they don't start forum threads about their beatings. Player Prati for example can ram my vehicle because he's having a bad game and me a good one. Then destroy it. Nothing happens to him. Nothing happens to him because I did not complain. Nothing happens to players who hate me and use false nicknames simply to goad me or ruin my game because I do not complain and start forum threads whingeing. These are the double standards I was and am the victim of. So you see, there are two sides to the coin. But you only see it now.