#31 2019-07-23 08:33:48

GottMitUns
Player
Russia
Reputation: -3
Registered: 2018-11-02
Posts: 178
Windows 10 Yandex Browser 19.6

Re: Banned for question

https://ibb.co/1Q0mMbv

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#32 2019-07-23 08:46:03

GottMitUns
Player
Russia
Reputation: -3
Registered: 2018-11-02
Posts: 178
Windows 10 Yandex Browser 19.6

Re: Banned for question

Screen-Shot0.jpg

I looked at the screenshots, but his nickname is not visible there, it’s only visible that someone is sitting there ... But that morning there were other players, Cowatho, Gtnhjczy, etc. Maybe they have screenshots with the location of this player?


https://ibb.co/1Q0mMbv

Offline

    Positive reputation 1   Negative reputation 0

#33 2019-07-24 21:38:54

Zwarrior
Gulag guard
Spain
Reputation: +1006
Location: Lusitania
Registered: 2018-10-14
Posts: 1,378
Windows 7 Chrome 75.0

Re: Banned for question

T-BONE wrote:

What, insults, have you no reasonable arguments

captkrk wrote:
T-BONE wrote:

Calling others stupid is ok then, wow

Why is this ... not banned?

Tuia are you still blind about your awesome protected friend?

Offline

    Positive reputation 1   Negative reputation 0

#34 2019-07-25 10:49:29

Insane
Player
Ukraine
Reputation: +1126
Location: Kharkiv
Registered: 2016-07-07
Posts: 1,201
Android Chrome 75.0

Re: Banned for question

Zwarrior wrote:
T-BONE wrote:

What, insults, have you no reasonable arguments

captkrk wrote:

Why is this ... not banned?

Tuia are you still blind about your awesome protected friend?

Every kingdom had a jester by the court.

Last edited by Insane (2019-07-25 10:49:49)

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#35 2019-09-19 13:57:02

Bad Actor
What Have The Romans Ever Done For Us?
England
Reputation: +319
Registered: 2015-12-29
Posts: 381
Windows 7 Chrome 76.0

Re: Banned for question

White Power needs another ban.
On Omaha earlier he joined then started abuse.
Someone's mother was gay and kill all jews.

As I said earlier in this thread, just ban him for life as he's clearly got mental issues.

Offline

    Positive reputation 1   Negative reputation 0

#36 2019-09-19 15:00:50

Pleiades53
Member
United States
Reputation: +650
Registered: 2015-06-26
Posts: 1,350
Windows 7 Firefox 69.0

Re: Banned for question

So in the scope of game play and strengthening the server and the players, NEW and regular, is there even a TINY amount of possibility, this player could add ANYTHING positive to the game experience or the reputation of the server or BF42? Or to the Forum for that matter. Hell how about in life???? Maybe not necessarily "positive" how about just participation as intended?

HOW is it even remotely possible, the absence of this whack, could cause anything besides positive outcome to SiMPLE? Anyone??

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#37 2019-09-19 15:13:13

Zwarrior
Gulag guard
Spain
Reputation: +1006
Location: Lusitania
Registered: 2018-10-14
Posts: 1,378
Windows 7 Chrome 76.0

Re: Banned for question

Pleiades53 wrote:

So in the scope of game play and strengthening the server and the players, NEW and regular, is there even a TINY amount of possibility, this player could add ANYTHING positive to the game experience or the reputation of the server or BF42? Or to the Forum for that matter. Hell how about in life???? Maybe not necessarily "positive" how about just participation as intended?

HOW is it even remotely possible, the absence of this whack, could cause anything besides positive outcome to SiMPLE? Anyone??

as far as i understand SIMPLE cannot get rid of the douchebags 100 %, but hey there are more normal players than douchebags for now i think.

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#38 2019-09-19 15:37:23

Arkos
Sedmin
Switzerland
Reputation: +2778
Registered: 2014-06-06
Posts: 7,041
Windows 7 Chrome 76.0

Re: Banned for question

Zwarrior wrote:

, but hey there are more normal players than douchebags for now i think.

...

Since when? smile

...

Offline

    Positive reputation 1   Negative reputation 0

#39 2019-09-19 16:17:50

Pleiades53
Member
United States
Reputation: +650
Registered: 2015-06-26
Posts: 1,350
Windows 7 Firefox 69.0

Re: Banned for question

I love your perspective and also agree with you 100% by the way. However, with the advent of the new "DOUCHE BAG REDUCTION CAMPAIGN" I would hope for more leniency on those that genuinely deserve it, followed by more discipline, for those that are disgustingly obvious, that they have zero benefit to the game, server, humanity, etc...........
PS: Man I am so sorry I played terribly yesterday, tked you by accident, peed on the jeep tires, farted in the storage room inside the bunker, some days I just plain suck more than normal.
THANKS for the patience with me too. Played well as a team for some time I might add.

Zwarrior wrote:
Pleiades53 wrote:

So in the scope of game play and strengthening the server and the players, NEW and regular, is there even a TINY amount of possibility, this player could add ANYTHING positive to the game experience or the reputation of the server or BF42? Or to the Forum for that matter. Hell how about in life???? Maybe not necessarily "positive" how about just participation as intended?

HOW is it even remotely possible, the absence of this whack, could cause anything besides positive outcome to SiMPLE? Anyone??

as far as i understand SIMPLE cannot get rid of the douchebags 100 %, but hey there are more normal players than douchebags for now i think.

Offline

    Positive reputation 1   Negative reputation 0

#40 2019-09-19 16:30:51

Bad Actor
What Have The Romans Ever Done For Us?
England
Reputation: +319
Registered: 2015-12-29
Posts: 381
Windows 7 Chrome 76.0

Re: Banned for question

Pleiades53 wrote:

PS: Man I am so sorry I farted in the storage room inside the bunker

Oh that was you was it?

I hate spawning in someone else's flatulence, especially in a bunker and it's bad etiquette subjecting your teammates to it.
Like farting in a lift.
At least post a 'Fire In The Hole!' warning dude.

Last edited by Bad Actor (2019-09-19 16:31:49)

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#41 2019-09-19 18:51:45

Pleiades53
Member
United States
Reputation: +650
Registered: 2015-06-26
Posts: 1,350
Windows 7 Firefox 69.0

Re: Banned for question

It was me indeed Bad Actor.
APOLOGIES for bad form in the bunker. Das Bunker.
PROMISE to put up sign next time: CAUTION: THIS ROOM BLOWN UP.
High5!!!!

Offline

    Positive reputation 2   Negative reputation 0

#42 2019-09-20 19:41:05

Goldie
Marshal Murat
Georgia
Reputation: +337
Registered: 2019-08-09
Posts: 930
Windows 7 Chrome 77.0

Re: Banned for question

Pleiades53 wrote:

It was me indeed Bad Actor.
APOLOGIES for bad form in the bunker. Das Bunker.
PROMISE to put up sign next time: CAUTION: THIS ROOM BLOWN UP.
High5!!!!

like ppl who tell the truth ;] +1

Last edited by Goldie (2019-09-20 19:41:30)

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

#43 2019-09-22 22:34:24

Pleiades53
Member
United States
Reputation: +650
Registered: 2015-06-26
Posts: 1,350
Windows 8.1 Firefox 69.0

Re: Banned for question

I tell the truth Goldie. Even if it is embarrassing. I get LOTS of embarrassing by the way. Some earned. Some..............not so much.
I am real sorry for the bunker buster move. Thats why Geneva outlawed gas.
:-)

Offline

    Positive reputation 0   Negative reputation 0

Board footer